These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12056525)

  • 1. The statistical evaluation of DNA mixtures with contributors from different ethnic groups.
    Fung WK; Hu YQ
    Int J Legal Med; 2002 Apr; 116(2):79-86. PubMed ID: 12056525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluating mixed stains with contributors of different ethnic groups under the NRC-II Recommendation 4.1.
    Fung WK; Hu YQ
    Stat Med; 2002 Dec; 21(23):3583-93. PubMed ID: 12436457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluating forensic DNA mixtures with contributors of different structured ethnic origins: a computer software.
    Hu YQ; Fung WK
    Int J Legal Med; 2003 Aug; 117(4):248-9. PubMed ID: 12827379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The evaluation of mixed stains from different ethnic origins: general result and common cases.
    Fung WK; Hu YQ
    Int J Legal Med; 2001 Aug; 115(1):48-53. PubMed ID: 11599769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Interpreting DNA mixtures.
    Weir BS; Triggs CM; Starling L; Stowell LI; Walsh KA; Buckleton J
    J Forensic Sci; 1997 Mar; 42(2):213-22. PubMed ID: 9068179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Facilitating complex DNA mixture interpretation by sequencing highly polymorphic haplotypes.
    Voskoboinik L; Motro U; Darvasi A
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2018 Jul; 35():136-140. PubMed ID: 29775859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effects of subpopulation structure on probability calculations of DNA profiles from forensic PCR analysis.
    Gallo JC; Thomas E; Novick GE; Herrera RJ
    Genetica; 1997; 101(1):1-12. PubMed ID: 9465406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. An assessment of the information content of likelihood ratios derived from complex mixtures.
    Marsden CD; Rudin N; Inman K; Lohmueller KE
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2016 May; 22():64-72. PubMed ID: 26851613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The effect of varying the number of contributors on likelihood ratios for complex DNA mixtures.
    Benschop CCG; Haned H; Jeurissen L; Gill PD; Sijen T
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2015 Nov; 19():92-99. PubMed ID: 26204570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Validation of a DNA mixture statistics tool incorporating allelic drop-out and drop-in.
    Mitchell AA; Tamariz J; O'Connell K; Ducasse N; Budimlija Z; Prinz M; Caragine T
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2012 Dec; 6(6):749-61. PubMed ID: 22999739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A large-scale validation of NOCIt's a posteriori probability of the number of contributors and its integration into forensic interpretation pipelines.
    Grgicak CM; Karkar S; Yearwood-Garcia X; Alfonse LE; Duffy KR; Lun DS
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2020 Jul; 47():102296. PubMed ID: 32339916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluation of forensic DNA mixture evidence: protocol for evaluation, interpretation, and statistical calculations using the combined probability of inclusion.
    Bieber FR; Buckleton JS; Budowle B; Butler JM; Coble MD
    BMC Genet; 2016 Aug; 17(1):125. PubMed ID: 27580588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Biostatistical evaluation of mixed stains with contributors of different ethnic origin.
    Fukshansky N; Bär W
    Int J Legal Med; 1999; 112(6):383-7. PubMed ID: 10550600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The predictive value of the maximum likelihood estimator of the number of contributors to a DNA mixture.
    Haned H; Pène L; Sauvage F; Pontier D
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2011 Aug; 5(4):281-4. PubMed ID: 20488773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Determining the number of contributors to DNA mixtures in the low-template regime: Exploring the impacts of sampling and detection effects.
    Norsworthy S; Lun DS; Grgicak CM
    Leg Med (Tokyo); 2018 May; 32():1-8. PubMed ID: 29453054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Accurate assessment of the weight of evidence for DNA mixtures by integrating the likelihood ratio.
    Slooten K
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2017 Mar; 27():1-16. PubMed ID: 27914277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The efficacy of DNA mixture to mixture matching.
    Bright JA; Taylor D; Kerr Z; Buckleton J; Kruijver M
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2019 Jul; 41():64-71. PubMed ID: 30986620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Distinguishing between donors and their relatives in complex DNA mixtures with binary models.
    Slooten K
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2016 Mar; 21():95-109. PubMed ID: 26745184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluation of DNA mixtures involving two pairs of relatives.
    Hu YQ; Fung WK
    Int J Legal Med; 2005 Sep; 119(5):251-9. PubMed ID: 15711800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The effect of relatedness on likelihood ratios and the use of conservative estimates.
    Brookfield JF
    Genetica; 1995; 96(1-2):13-9. PubMed ID: 7607450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.