These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

275 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12057781)

  • 1. Biphasic versus triphasic oral contraceptives for contraception.
    van Vliet HA; Grimes DA; Helmerhorst FM; Schulz KF
    Contraception; 2002 May; 65(5):321-4. PubMed ID: 12057781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Biphasic versus triphasic oral contraceptives for contraception.
    Van Vliet H; Grimes D; Helmerhorst F; Schulz K
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2001; (4):CD003283. PubMed ID: 11687185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Biphasic versus triphasic oral contraceptives for contraception.
    Van Vliet HA; Grimes DA; Helmerhorst FM; Schulz KF
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2003; (2):CD003283. PubMed ID: 12804457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Biphasic versus triphasic oral contraceptives for contraception.
    Van Vliet HA; Grimes DA; Helmerhorst FM; Schulz KF
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2006 Jul; 2006(3):CD003283. PubMed ID: 16856002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Biphasic versus monophasic oral contraceptives for contraception.
    Van Vliet HA; Grimes DA; Helmerhorst FM; Schulz KF
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2003; (2):CD002032. PubMed ID: 12804421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Biphasic versus monophasic oral contraceptives for contraception.
    Van Vliet H; Grimes D; Helmerhorst F; Schulz K
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2001; (4):CD002032. PubMed ID: 11687135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Biphasic versus monophasic oral contraceptives for contraception.
    Van Vliet HA; Grimes DA; Helmerhorst FM; Schulz KF
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2006 Jul; 2006(3):CD002032. PubMed ID: 16855983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Biphasic versus monophasic oral contraceptives for contraception.
    Van Vliet H; Grimes DA; Helmerhorst F; Schulz K
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2001; (2):CD002032. PubMed ID: 11406026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of two triphasic oral contraceptives containing either gestodene or norethindrone: a randomized, controlled trial.
    Weber-Diehl F; Lehnert J; Lachnit U
    Contraception; 1993 Oct; 48(4):291-301. PubMed ID: 8222658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Changes in coagulation and anticoagulation in women taking low-dose triphasic oral contraceptives: a controlled comparative 12-month clinical trial.
    Notelovitz M; Kitchens CS; Khan FY
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1992 Nov; 167(5):1255-61. PubMed ID: 1442974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A clinical comparison of two triphasic oral contraceptives with levonorgestrel or norethindrone: a prospective, randomized, single-blind study.
    Masson S; Franssen E; Hilditch JR; Powell MG
    Contraception; 1993 Jan; 47(1):43-54. PubMed ID: 8436001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A two-year clinical study of the effects of two triphasic oral contraceptives on plasma lipids.
    Kakis G; Powell M; Marshall A; Woutersz TB; Steiner G
    Int J Fertil Menopausal Stud; 1994; 39(5):283-91. PubMed ID: 7820162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation of the clinical performance of three triphasic oral contraceptives: a multicenter, randomized comparative trial.
    Schilling LH; Bolding OT; Chenault CB; Chong AP; Fleury F; Forrest K; Glick HI; Hasson HM; Heil CG; London RS
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1989 May; 160(5 Pt 2):1264-8. PubMed ID: 2655451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Triphasic versus monophasic oral contraceptives for contraception.
    van Vliet HA; Grimes DA; Lopez LM; Schulz KF; Helmerhorst FM
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2006 Jul; (3):CD003553. PubMed ID: 16856013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A multicenter randomized comparison of cycle control and laboratory findings with oral contraceptive agents containing 100 microg levonorgestrel with 20 microg ethinyl estradiol or triphasic norethindrone with ethinyl estradiol.
    Reisman H; Martin D; Gast MJ
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1999 Nov; 181(5 Pt 2):45-52. PubMed ID: 10561675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Triphasic versus monophasic oral contraceptives for contraception.
    Van Vliet HA; Grimes DA; Lopez LM; Schulz KF; Helmerhorst FM
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2011 Nov; 2011(11):CD003553. PubMed ID: 22071807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Enlarged follicles in women using oral contraceptives.
    Broome M; Clayton J; Fotherby K
    Contraception; 1995 Jul; 52(1):13-6. PubMed ID: 8521709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Ovarian activity suppression by two different low-dose triphasic oral contraceptives.
    van der Does J; Exalto N; Dieben T; Bennink HC
    Contraception; 1995 Dec; 52(6):357-61. PubMed ID: 8749599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Phasic approach to oral contraceptives.
    Hale RW
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1987 Oct; 157(4 Pt 2):1052-8. PubMed ID: 3118718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Relationships between blood pressure, oral contraceptive use and metabolic risk markers for cardiovascular disease.
    Godsland IF; Crook D; Devenport M; Wynn V
    Contraception; 1995 Sep; 52(3):143-9. PubMed ID: 7587185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.