These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

110 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12058588)

  • 1. [Implantation of transponders at the bottom of the ear in equines].
    Mader Ch; Geisel O; Gerhards H; Hermanns W
    Berl Munch Tierarztl Wochenschr; 2002; 115(5-6):161-6. PubMed ID: 12058588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluation of pain and inflammation associated with hot iron branding and microchip transponder injection in horses.
    Lindegaard C; Vaabengaard D; Christophersen MT; Ekstøm CT; Fjeldborg J
    Am J Vet Res; 2009 Jul; 70(7):840-7. PubMed ID: 19566469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effects of injecting electronic transponders into the auricle of pigs.
    Lammers GH; Langeveld NG; Lambooij E; Gruys E
    Vet Rec; 1995 Jun; 136(24):606-9. PubMed ID: 7571264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Readability and histological biocompatibility of microchip transponders in horses.
    Wulf M; Wohlsein P; Aurich JE; Nees M; Baumgärtner W; Aurich C
    Vet J; 2013 Oct; 198(1):103-8. PubMed ID: 23769456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Electronic identification with injectable transponders in pig production: results of a field trail on commercial farms and slaughterhouses concerning injectability and retrievability.
    Lambooij E; Langeveld NG; Lammers GH; Huiskes JH
    Vet Q; 1995 Dec; 17(4):118-23. PubMed ID: 8751271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Marking of horses].
    Voigt G
    Dtsch Tierarztl Wochenschr; 1998 Mar; 105(3):112-3. PubMed ID: 9581382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Subcutaneous tissue reaction to polyethylene terephtalate-covered electronic identification transponders in pigs.
    Lambooij E; de Groot PH; Molenbeek RF; Gruys E
    Vet Q; 1992 Dec; 14(4):145-7. PubMed ID: 1485404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of visual and electronic identification devices in pigs: slaughterhouse performance.
    Santamarina C; Hernández-Jover M; Babot D; Caja G
    J Anim Sci; 2007 Feb; 85(2):497-502. PubMed ID: 17235033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Traceability of extensively produced Iberian pigs using visual and electronic identification devices from farm to slaughter.
    Gosálvez LF; Santamarina C; Averós X; Hernández-Jover M; Caja G; Babot D
    J Anim Sci; 2007 Oct; 85(10):2746-52. PubMed ID: 17609464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Subcutaneous electronic identification in cattle: a field study.
    Løken T; Vatn G; Kummen E
    Vet Rec; 2011 Sep; 169(10):250. PubMed ID: 21813580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Biocompatibility of glass-encapsulated electronic chips (transponders) used for the identification of pigs.
    Gruys E; Schakenraad JM; Kruit LK; Bolscher JM
    Vet Rec; 1993 Oct; 133(16):385-8. PubMed ID: 8310604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. In vivo mechanical and in vitro electromagnetic side-effects of a ruminal transponder in cattle.
    Antonini C; Trabalza-Marinucci M; Franceschini R; Mughetti L; Acuti G; Faba A; Asdrubali G; Boiti C
    J Anim Sci; 2006 Nov; 84(11):3133-42. PubMed ID: 17032809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Optimal implantation site of transponders for identification of experimental swine.
    Nakamura S; Sakaoka A; Ikuno E; Asou R; Shimizu D; Hagiwara H
    Exp Anim; 2019 Feb; 68(1):13-23. PubMed ID: 30078789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Neoplasia and granulomas surrounding microchip transponders in Damaraland mole rats (Cryptomys damarensis).
    Sura R; French RA; Goldman BD; Schwartz DR
    Vet Pathol; 2011 Jul; 48(4):896-902. PubMed ID: 20724516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Microchipping horses.
    Ware S
    Vet Rec; 1999 Nov; 145(22):647. PubMed ID: 10619615
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Read distance performance and variation of 5 low-frequency radio frequency identification panel transceiver manufacturers.
    Ryan SE; Blasi DA; Anglin CO; Bryant AM; Rickard BA; Anderson MP; Fike KE
    J Anim Sci; 2010 Jul; 88(7):2514-22. PubMed ID: 20407068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Estimation of biocompatibility of fibers with large mechanical resistance].
    Zywicka B
    Polim Med; 2004; 34(3):3-48. PubMed ID: 15631154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Use of ear tags and injectable transponders for the identification and traceability of pigs from birth to the end of the slaughter line.
    Caja G; Hernández-Jover M; Conill C; Garín D; Alabern X; Farriol B; Ghirardi J
    J Anim Sci; 2005 Sep; 83(9):2215-24. PubMed ID: 16100077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of visual and electronic identification devices in pigs: on-farm performances.
    Babot D; Hernández-Jover M; Caja G; Santamarina C; Ghirardi JJ
    J Anim Sci; 2006 Sep; 84(9):2575-81. PubMed ID: 16908663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A biometric approach to laboratory rodent identification.
    Cameron J; Jacobson C; Nilsson K; Rögnvaldsson T
    Lab Anim (NY); 2007 Mar; 36(3):36-40. PubMed ID: 17311048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.