These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12060692)

  • 1. Microarray optimizations: increasing spot accuracy and automated identification of true microarray signals.
    Tran PH; Peiffer DA; Shin Y; Meek LM; Brody JP; Cho KW
    Nucleic Acids Res; 2002 Jun; 30(12):e54. PubMed ID: 12060692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effect of local background intensities in the normalization of cDNA microarray data with a skewed expression profiles.
    Kim JH; Shin DM; Lee YS
    Exp Mol Med; 2002 Jul; 34(3):224-32. PubMed ID: 12216114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Automatic analysis of DNA microarray images using mathematical morphology.
    Angulo J; Serra J
    Bioinformatics; 2003 Mar; 19(5):553-62. PubMed ID: 12651712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The statistics of identifying differentially expressed genes in Expresso and TM4: a comparison.
    Sioson AA; Mane SP; Li P; Sha W; Heath LS; Bohnert HJ; Grene R
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2006 Apr; 7():215. PubMed ID: 16626497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Improving gene quantification by adjustable spot-image restoration.
    Daskalakis A; Cavouras D; Bougioukos P; Kostopoulos S; Glotsos D; Kalatzis I; Kagadis GC; Argyropoulos C; Nikiforidis G
    Bioinformatics; 2007 Sep; 23(17):2265-72. PubMed ID: 17599935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A robust neural networks approach for spatial and intensity-dependent normalization of cDNA microarray data.
    Tarca AL; Cooke JE; Mackay J
    Bioinformatics; 2005 Jun; 21(11):2674-83. PubMed ID: 15797913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. An algorithm for automatic evaluation of the spot quality in two-color DNA microarray experiments.
    Novikov E; Barillot E
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2005 Dec; 6():293. PubMed ID: 16336688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Segmentation and intensity estimation of microarray images using a gamma-t mixture model.
    Baek J; Son YS; McLachlan GJ
    Bioinformatics; 2007 Feb; 23(4):458-65. PubMed ID: 17166856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Spot intensity ratio statistics in two-channel microarray experiments.
    Park T; Kim K; Yi SG; Kim JH; Lee YS; Lee S
    J Bioinform Comput Biol; 2007 Aug; 5(4):865-73. PubMed ID: 17787060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A statistical method for flagging weak spots improves normalization and ratio estimates in microarrays.
    Yang MC; Ruan QG; Yang JJ; Eckenrode S; Wu S; McIndoe RA; She JX
    Physiol Genomics; 2001 Oct; 7(1):45-53. PubMed ID: 11595791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Assessment of reliability of microarray data and estimation of signal thresholds using mixture modeling.
    Asyali MH; Shoukri MM; Demirkaya O; Khabar KS
    Nucleic Acids Res; 2004; 32(8):2323-35. PubMed ID: 15113873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Profound influence of microarray scanner characteristics on gene expression ratios: analysis and procedure for correction.
    Lyng H; Badiee A; Svendsrud DH; Hovig E; Myklebost O; Stokke T
    BMC Genomics; 2004 Feb; 5(1):10. PubMed ID: 15018648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Correlation statistics for cDNA microarray image analysis.
    Nagarajan R; Upreti M
    IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform; 2006; 3(3):232-8. PubMed ID: 17048461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Use of signal quality measurements to gain efficiency in the analysis of cDNA microarray data.
    Bergemann TL
    J Genet Genomics; 2010 Apr; 37(4):265-79. PubMed ID: 20439103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Estimating gene signals from noisy microarray images.
    Sarder P; Nehorai A; Davis PH; Stanley SL
    IEEE Trans Nanobioscience; 2008 Jun; 7(2):142-53. PubMed ID: 18556262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A hill-climbing approach for automatic gridding of cDNA microarray images.
    Rueda L; Vidyadharan V
    IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform; 2006; 3(1):72-83. PubMed ID: 17048394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Quick and simple: quality control of microarray data.
    Sauer U; Preininger C; Hany-Schmatzberger R
    Bioinformatics; 2005 Apr; 21(8):1572-8. PubMed ID: 15615693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Image analysis for cDNA microarrays.
    Rahnenführer J
    Methods Inf Med; 2005; 44(3):405-7. PubMed ID: 16113764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Microarray segmentation methods significantly influence data precision.
    Ahmed AA; Vias M; Iyer NG; Caldas C; Brenton JD
    Nucleic Acids Res; 2004 Mar; 32(5):e50. PubMed ID: 15028803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Characterizing dye bias in microarray experiments.
    Dobbin KK; Kawasaki ES; Petersen DW; Simon RM
    Bioinformatics; 2005 May; 21(10):2430-7. PubMed ID: 15774555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.