These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
42. The constitutionality of the Freedom of Choice Act of 1993. Axel DA Hastings Law J; 1994; 45(3):641-65. PubMed ID: 11656418 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
43. The conflict between "disabling" and "enabling" paradigms in law: sterilization, the developmentally disabled, and the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990. Dugan JC Cornell Law Rev; 1993 Mar; 78(3):507-42. PubMed ID: 11659683 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
44. The Supreme Court on abortion funding: the second time around. Horan DJ; Marzen TJ St Louis Univ Law J; 1981; 25(2):411-27. PubMed ID: 11655812 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
45. Arline, Chalk, the Civil Rights Restoration Act, and the AIDS handicap. Turner R AIDS Public Policy J; 1988; 3(3):23-30. PubMed ID: 11650099 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
46. Nursing in action, the future is now. President's address. Cole ER N J Nurse; 1985; 15(2):8-9, 17. PubMed ID: 3858793 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
48. Natural death acts and right to die legislation. Hallagan JB Med Trial Tech Q; 1986; 32(3):301-20. PubMed ID: 11649842 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
49. Conservatorship of Roulet: civil commitment and due process in California. Klipstein DB; Weinroth DJ Hastings Constit Law Q; 1979; 6(4):1061-106. PubMed ID: 11658279 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
50. Framework provides path through right-to-know law. Ashford NA; Caldart CC Occup Health Saf; 1983 Oct; 52(10):11-9, 25-7. PubMed ID: 6646543 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
51. For the handicapped, rights but no welcome. Will GF Hastings Cent Rep; 1986 Jun; 16(3):5-8. PubMed ID: 2941392 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. The itinerant embryo and the neo-nativity scene: bifurcating biological maternity. O'Brien S Utah Law Rev; 1987; 1987-1(1):1-33. PubMed ID: 11658919 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
53. Title X, the abortion debate, and the First Amendment. Shapiro AA Columbia Law Rev; 1990 Oct; 90(6):1737-78. PubMed ID: 15739274 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
54. Thornburgh v. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists: distinguishing abortion regulation from attempted intimidation. Erato LD Loyola Law Rev; 1987; 33(2):498-516. PubMed ID: 11655874 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
55. ERA: equal rights for abortion? Noonan JT Hum Life Rev; 1984; 10(2):29-44. PubMed ID: 11651741 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
56. Indigent women--what right to abortion? Friedman BW NY Law Sch Law Rev; 1978; 23(4):709-41. PubMed ID: 11662584 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
57. The constitutionality of the Human Life Bill. Ruf BA Wash Univ Law Q; 1983; 61(1):219-52. PubMed ID: 11655816 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
58. Parental notification of abortion and minors' rights under the Montana constitution. Hayhurst MB Mont Law Rev; 1997; 58(2):565-98. PubMed ID: 16180294 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
59. Finding fathers: artificial insemination, lesbians, and the law. Arnup K Can J Women Law; 1994; 7(1):97-115. PubMed ID: 11660009 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
60. Isaac Ray Symposium: Human rights, the law and psychiatric treatment. Summary and discussion: the first day of the symposium. Weisberger JR Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1974 Sep; 2(3):168-71. PubMed ID: 4455310 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]