These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12061767)
1. Likelihood judgment based on previously observed outcomes: the alternative-outcomes effect in a learning paradigm. Windschitl PD; Young ME; Jenson ME Mem Cognit; 2002 Apr; 30(3):469-77. PubMed ID: 12061767 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The Influence of Alternative Outcomes on Gut-Level Perceptions of Certainty. Windschitl PD; Young ME Organ Behav Hum Decis Process; 2001 May; 85(1):109-134. PubMed ID: 11341819 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The dud-alternative effect in likelihood judgment. Windschitl PD; Chambers JR J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2004 Jan; 30(1):198-215. PubMed ID: 14736307 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Probability judgment and subadditivity: the role of working memory capacity and constraining retrieval. Dougherty MR; Hunter J Mem Cognit; 2003 Sep; 31(6):968-82. PubMed ID: 14651303 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The Binary Additivity of Subjective Probability Does not Indicate the Binary Complementarity of Perceived Certainty. Windschitl PD Organ Behav Hum Decis Process; 2000 Mar; 81(2):195-225. PubMed ID: 10706814 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Hypothesis generation, probability judgment, and individual differences in working memory capacity. Dougherty MR; Hunter JE Acta Psychol (Amst); 2003 Jul; 113(3):263-82. PubMed ID: 12834999 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Violations of coherence in subjective probability: a representational and assessment processes account. Mandel DR Cognition; 2008 Jan; 106(1):130-56. PubMed ID: 17300773 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The influence of improper sets of information on judgment: how irrelevant information can bias judged probability. Dougherty MR; Sprenger A J Exp Psychol Gen; 2006 May; 135(2):262-81. PubMed ID: 16719653 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The memory state heuristic: A formal model based on repeated recognition judgments. Castela M; Erdfelder E J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2017 Feb; 43(2):205-225. PubMed ID: 27632560 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The cognitive substrate of subjective probability. Nilsson H; Olsson H; Juslin P J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2005 Jul; 31(4):600-20. PubMed ID: 16060768 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparability effects in probability judgments. Pleskac TJ Psychol Sci; 2012 Aug; 23(8):848-54. PubMed ID: 22825358 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effects of a Relative-Frequency Elicitation Question on Likelihood Judgment Accuracy: The Case of External Correspondence. Price PC Organ Behav Hum Decis Process; 1998 Dec; 76(3):277-297. PubMed ID: 9878511 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Between ignorance and truth: Partition dependence and learning in judgment under uncertainty. See KE; Fox CR; Rottenstreich YS J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2006 Nov; 32(6):1385-402. PubMed ID: 17087591 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Heuristics can produce surprisingly rational probability estimates: Comment on Costello and Watts (2014). Nilsson H; Juslin P; Winman A Psychol Rev; 2016 Jan; 123(1):103-11. PubMed ID: 26709414 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Spontaneous discounting of availability in frequency judgment tasks. Oppenheimer DM Psychol Sci; 2004 Feb; 15(2):100-5. PubMed ID: 14738516 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]