These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12062604)

  • 1. Impact of postimplant edema on V(100) and D(90) in prostate brachytherapy: can implant quality be predicted on day 0?
    Waterman FM; Dicker AP
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2002 Jul; 53(3):610-21. PubMed ID: 12062604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effect of prostatic edema on CT-based postimplant dosimetry.
    Dogan N; Mohideen N; Glasgow GP; Keys K; Flanigan RC
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2002 Jun; 53(2):483-9. PubMed ID: 12023153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The impact of postimplant edema on the urethral dose in prostate brachytherapy.
    Waterman FM; Dicker AP
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2000 Jun; 47(3):661-4. PubMed ID: 10837949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A dynamic model for the estimation of optimum timing of computed tomography scan for dose evaluation of 125I or 103Pd seed implant of prostate.
    Yue N; Dicker AP; Corn BW; Nath R; Waterman FM
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1999 Jan; 43(2):447-54. PubMed ID: 10030274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Timing of computed tomography-based postimplant assessment following permanent transperineal prostate brachytherapy.
    Prestidge BR; Bice WS; Kiefer EJ; Prete JJ
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1998 Mar; 40(5):1111-5. PubMed ID: 9539566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effect of edema associated with 131Cs prostate permanent seed implants on dosimetric quality indices.
    Kehwar TS; Jones HA; Huq MS; Beriwal S; Benoit RM; Smith RP
    Med Phys; 2009 Aug; 36(8):3536-42. PubMed ID: 19746787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Optimum timing for image-based dose evaluation of 125I and 103PD prostate seed implants.
    Yue N; Chen Z; Peschel R; Dicker AP; Waterman FM; Nath R
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1999 Nov; 45(4):1063-72. PubMed ID: 10571216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Edema associated with I-125 or Pd-103 prostate brachytherapy and its impact on post-implant dosimetry: an analysis based on serial CT acquisition.
    Waterman FM; Yue N; Corn BW; Dicker AP
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1998 Jul; 41(5):1069-77. PubMed ID: 9719117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Sequential evaluation of prostate edema after permanent seed prostate brachytherapy using CT-MRI fusion.
    Taussky D; Austen L; Toi A; Yeung I; Williams T; Pearson S; McLean M; Pond G; Crook J
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2005 Jul; 62(4):974-80. PubMed ID: 15989997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effect of edema on postimplant dosimetry in prostate brachytherapy using CT/MRI fusion.
    Tanaka O; Hayashi S; Matsuo M; Nakano M; Uno H; Ohtakara K; Miyoshi T; Deguchi T; Hoshi H
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2007 Oct; 69(2):614-8. PubMed ID: 17869675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Influence of prostatic edema on 131Cs permanent prostate seed implants: a dosimetric and radiobiological study.
    Kehwar TS; Jones HA; Huq MS; Smith RP
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2011 Jun; 80(2):621-7. PubMed ID: 20932692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effect of post-implant edema on the rectal dose in prostate brachytherapy.
    Waterman FM; Dicker AP
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1999 Oct; 45(3):571-6. PubMed ID: 10524408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A detailed examination of the difference between planned and treated margins in 125I permanent prostate brachytherapy.
    Patel AB; Waterman FM; Dicker AP
    Brachytherapy; 2003; 2(4):223-8. PubMed ID: 15062130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The dependence of prostate postimplant dosimetric quality on CT volume determination.
    Merrick GS; Butler WM; Dorsey AT; Lief JH
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1999 Jul; 44(5):1111-7. PubMed ID: 10421545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Can the Day 0 CT-scan predict the post-implant scanning? Results from 136 prostate cancer patients.
    Cattani F; Vavassori A; Comi S; Gherardi F; Russo S; Orecchia R; Jereczek-Fossa BA
    Phys Med; 2017 Aug; 40():66-71. PubMed ID: 28743617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of intraoperative ultrasound with postimplant computed tomography--dosimetric values at Day 1 and Day 30 after prostate brachytherapy.
    Ohashi T; Yorozu A; Toya K; Saito S; Momma T; Nagata H; Kosugi M; Shigematsu N; Kubo A
    Brachytherapy; 2007; 6(4):246-53. PubMed ID: 17959425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Rectal-wall dose dependence on postplan timing after permanent-seed prostate brachytherapy.
    Taussky D; Yeung I; Williams T; Pearson S; McLean M; Pond G; Crook J
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2006 Jun; 65(2):358-63. PubMed ID: 16563654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Correlation between pre- and postimplant dosimetry for iodine-125 seed implants for localized prostate cancer.
    Al-Qaisieh B; Witteveen T; Carey B; Henry A; Bottomley D; Smith J; Franks K; Bownes P
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2009 Oct; 75(2):626-30. PubMed ID: 19540077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The impact of edema on planning 125I and 103Pd prostate implants.
    Yue N; Dicker AP; Nath R; Waterman FM
    Med Phys; 1999 May; 26(5):763-7. PubMed ID: 10360539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A comparison of permanent prostate brachytherapy techniques: preplan vs. hybrid interactive planning with postimplant analysis.
    Shanahan TG; Nanavati PJ; Mueller PW; Maxey RB
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2002 Jun; 53(2):490-6. PubMed ID: 12023154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.