131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12062604)
1. Impact of postimplant edema on V(100) and D(90) in prostate brachytherapy: can implant quality be predicted on day 0?
Waterman FM; Dicker AP
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2002 Jul; 53(3):610-21. PubMed ID: 12062604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effect of prostatic edema on CT-based postimplant dosimetry.
Dogan N; Mohideen N; Glasgow GP; Keys K; Flanigan RC
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2002 Jun; 53(2):483-9. PubMed ID: 12023153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The impact of postimplant edema on the urethral dose in prostate brachytherapy.
Waterman FM; Dicker AP
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2000 Jun; 47(3):661-4. PubMed ID: 10837949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A dynamic model for the estimation of optimum timing of computed tomography scan for dose evaluation of 125I or 103Pd seed implant of prostate.
Yue N; Dicker AP; Corn BW; Nath R; Waterman FM
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1999 Jan; 43(2):447-54. PubMed ID: 10030274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Timing of computed tomography-based postimplant assessment following permanent transperineal prostate brachytherapy.
Prestidge BR; Bice WS; Kiefer EJ; Prete JJ
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1998 Mar; 40(5):1111-5. PubMed ID: 9539566
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effect of edema associated with 131Cs prostate permanent seed implants on dosimetric quality indices.
Kehwar TS; Jones HA; Huq MS; Beriwal S; Benoit RM; Smith RP
Med Phys; 2009 Aug; 36(8):3536-42. PubMed ID: 19746787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Optimum timing for image-based dose evaluation of 125I and 103PD prostate seed implants.
Yue N; Chen Z; Peschel R; Dicker AP; Waterman FM; Nath R
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1999 Nov; 45(4):1063-72. PubMed ID: 10571216
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Edema associated with I-125 or Pd-103 prostate brachytherapy and its impact on post-implant dosimetry: an analysis based on serial CT acquisition.
Waterman FM; Yue N; Corn BW; Dicker AP
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1998 Jul; 41(5):1069-77. PubMed ID: 9719117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Sequential evaluation of prostate edema after permanent seed prostate brachytherapy using CT-MRI fusion.
Taussky D; Austen L; Toi A; Yeung I; Williams T; Pearson S; McLean M; Pond G; Crook J
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2005 Jul; 62(4):974-80. PubMed ID: 15989997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effect of edema on postimplant dosimetry in prostate brachytherapy using CT/MRI fusion.
Tanaka O; Hayashi S; Matsuo M; Nakano M; Uno H; Ohtakara K; Miyoshi T; Deguchi T; Hoshi H
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2007 Oct; 69(2):614-8. PubMed ID: 17869675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Influence of prostatic edema on 131Cs permanent prostate seed implants: a dosimetric and radiobiological study.
Kehwar TS; Jones HA; Huq MS; Smith RP
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2011 Jun; 80(2):621-7. PubMed ID: 20932692
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effect of post-implant edema on the rectal dose in prostate brachytherapy.
Waterman FM; Dicker AP
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1999 Oct; 45(3):571-6. PubMed ID: 10524408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A detailed examination of the difference between planned and treated margins in 125I permanent prostate brachytherapy.
Patel AB; Waterman FM; Dicker AP
Brachytherapy; 2003; 2(4):223-8. PubMed ID: 15062130
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The dependence of prostate postimplant dosimetric quality on CT volume determination.
Merrick GS; Butler WM; Dorsey AT; Lief JH
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1999 Jul; 44(5):1111-7. PubMed ID: 10421545
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Can the Day 0 CT-scan predict the post-implant scanning? Results from 136 prostate cancer patients.
Cattani F; Vavassori A; Comi S; Gherardi F; Russo S; Orecchia R; Jereczek-Fossa BA
Phys Med; 2017 Aug; 40():66-71. PubMed ID: 28743617
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of intraoperative ultrasound with postimplant computed tomography--dosimetric values at Day 1 and Day 30 after prostate brachytherapy.
Ohashi T; Yorozu A; Toya K; Saito S; Momma T; Nagata H; Kosugi M; Shigematsu N; Kubo A
Brachytherapy; 2007; 6(4):246-53. PubMed ID: 17959425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Rectal-wall dose dependence on postplan timing after permanent-seed prostate brachytherapy.
Taussky D; Yeung I; Williams T; Pearson S; McLean M; Pond G; Crook J
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2006 Jun; 65(2):358-63. PubMed ID: 16563654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Correlation between pre- and postimplant dosimetry for iodine-125 seed implants for localized prostate cancer.
Al-Qaisieh B; Witteveen T; Carey B; Henry A; Bottomley D; Smith J; Franks K; Bownes P
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2009 Oct; 75(2):626-30. PubMed ID: 19540077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The impact of edema on planning 125I and 103Pd prostate implants.
Yue N; Dicker AP; Nath R; Waterman FM
Med Phys; 1999 May; 26(5):763-7. PubMed ID: 10360539
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A comparison of permanent prostate brachytherapy techniques: preplan vs. hybrid interactive planning with postimplant analysis.
Shanahan TG; Nanavati PJ; Mueller PW; Maxey RB
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2002 Jun; 53(2):490-6. PubMed ID: 12023154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
