These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

185 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12063732)

  • 1. [Digital full field mammography: comparison between radiographic direct magnification and digital monitor zooming].
    Fischer U; Baum F; Obenauer S; Funke M; Hermann KP; Grabbe E
    Radiologe; 2002 Apr; 42(4):261-4. PubMed ID: 12063732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparative study in patients with microcalcifications: full-field digital mammography vs screen-film mammography.
    Fischer U; Baum F; Obenauer S; Luftner-Nagel S; von Heyden D; Vosshenrich R; Grabbe E
    Eur Radiol; 2002 Nov; 12(11):2679-83. PubMed ID: 12386757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Is postexcision, preradiation mammogram necessary in patients after breast-conserving surgery with negative margins.
    Adkisson CD; McLaughlin SA; Vallow LA; Heckman MG; Diehl NN; Bagaria SP; Howe N; Gibson T; Pockaj B
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2013 Oct; 20(10):3205-11. PubMed ID: 23975292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Diagnostic performance of digital breast tomosynthesis with a wide scan angle compared to full-field digital mammography for the detection and characterization of microcalcifications.
    Clauser P; Nagl G; Helbich TH; Pinker-Domenig K; Weber M; Kapetas P; Bernathova M; Baltzer PAT
    Eur J Radiol; 2016 Dec; 85(12):2161-2168. PubMed ID: 27842661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluation of appropriate short-term mammographic surveillance in patients who undergo breast-conserving Surgery (BCS).
    Gunia SR; Merrigan TL; Poulton TB; Mamounas EP
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2012 Oct; 19(10):3139-43. PubMed ID: 22872291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Characterization of microcalcification: can digital monitor zooming replace magnification mammography in full-field digital mammography?
    Kim MJ; Kim EK; Kwak JY; Son EJ; Youk JH; Choi SH; Han M; Oh KK
    Eur Radiol; 2009 Feb; 19(2):310-7. PubMed ID: 18677486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The value of postlumpectomy mammogram in the management of breast cancer patients presenting with suspiciouis microcalcifications.
    Aref A; Youssef E; Washington T; Segel M; Grigorian C; Bongers S; Bouwman D
    Cancer J Sci Am; 2000; 6(1):25-7. PubMed ID: 10696735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Follow-up of B3 breast lesions without residual microcalcifications post vacuum-assisted biopsy, can contrast-enhanced digital mammography help?
    Bicchierai G; Nori J; De Benedetto D; Boeri C; Vanzi E; Bianchi S; Kaur Gill M; Cirone D; Miele V
    Breast J; 2020 Feb; 26(2):299-302. PubMed ID: 31486197
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Film-screen magnification versus electronic magnification and enhancement of digitized contact mammograms in the assessment of subtle microcalcifications.
    Perisinakis K; Damilakis J; Kontogiannis E; Gourtsoyiannis N
    Invest Radiol; 2001 Dec; 36(12):726-33. PubMed ID: 11753144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation of malignancy risk stratification of microcalcifications detected on mammography: a study based on the 5th edition of BI-RADS.
    Kim SY; Kim HY; Kim EK; Kim MJ; Moon HJ; Yoon JH
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2015 Sep; 22(9):2895-901. PubMed ID: 25608770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Visualization of microcalcifications on mammographies obtained by digital full-field mammography in comparison to conventional film-screen mammography].
    Diekmann S; Bick U; von Heyden H; Diekmann F
    Rofo; 2003 Jun; 175(6):775-9. PubMed ID: 12811689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Usefulness of MRI of microcalcification lesions to determine the indication for stereotactic mammotome biopsy.
    Kikuchi M; Tanino H; Kosaka Y; Sengoku N; Yamashita K; Minatani N; Nishimiya H; Waraya M; Katoh H; Enomoto T; Kajita S; Woodhams R; Watanabe M
    Anticancer Res; 2014 Nov; 34(11):6749-53. PubMed ID: 25368286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Management of microcalcifications that develop at the lumpectomy site after breast-conserving therapy.
    Vora SA; Wazer DE; Homer MJ
    Radiology; 1997 Jun; 203(3):667-71. PubMed ID: 9169686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Digital full field mammography: physical principles and clinical aspects].
    Säbel M; Aichinger U; Schulz-Wendtland R; Bautz W
    Rontgenpraxis; 1999; 52(5-6):171-7. PubMed ID: 10574025
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Comparison between electronic zoom and geometric magnification of clusters of microcalcifications on digital mammography].
    Moraux-Wallyn M; Chaveron C; Bachelle F; Taieb S; Ceugnart L
    J Radiol; 2010 Sep; 91(9 Pt 1):879-83. PubMed ID: 20814375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Local tumor recurrence following breast-conservation therapy: correlation of histopathologic findings with detection method and mammographic findings.
    Giess CS; Keating DM; Osborne MP; Rosenblatt R
    Radiology; 1999 Sep; 212(3):829-35. PubMed ID: 10478253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Zooming method (x 2.0) of digital mammography vs digital magnification view (x 1.8) in full-field digital mammography for the diagnosis of microcalcifications.
    Kim MJ; Youk JH; Kang DR; Choi SH; Kwak JY; Son EJ; Kim EK
    Br J Radiol; 2010 Jun; 83(990):486-92. PubMed ID: 19752171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Bracketing wires for preoperative breast needle localization.
    Liberman L; Kaplan J; Van Zee KJ; Morris EA; LaTrenta LR; Abramson AF; Dershaw DD
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2001 Sep; 177(3):565-72. PubMed ID: 11517048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Impact of breast density on computer-aided detection in full-field digital mammography.
    Obenauer S; Sohns C; Werner C; Grabbe E
    J Digit Imaging; 2006 Sep; 19(3):258-63. PubMed ID: 16741664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Comparison of dignity determination of mammographic microcalcification with two systems for digital full-field mammography with different detector resolution: a retrospective clinical study].
    Schulz-Wendtland R; Hermann KP; Adamietz B; Meier-Meitinger M; Wenkel E; Lell M; Anders K; Uder M
    Radiologe; 2011 Feb; 51(2):126-9. PubMed ID: 21069511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.