These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

339 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12064228)

  • 1. Phylogenetic analysis and intraspecific variation: performance of parsimony, likelihood, and distance methods.
    Wiens JJ; Servedio MR
    Syst Biol; 1998 Jun; 47(2):228-53. PubMed ID: 12064228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Accuracy of estimated phylogenetic trees from molecular data. II. Gene frequency data.
    Nei M; Tajima F; Tateno Y
    J Mol Evol; 1983; 19(2):153-70. PubMed ID: 6571220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Relative efficiencies of the maximum-likelihood, neighbor-joining, and maximum-parsimony methods when substitution rate varies with site.
    Tateno Y; Takezaki N; Nei M
    Mol Biol Evol; 1994 Mar; 11(2):261-77. PubMed ID: 8170367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A simulation comparison of phylogeny algorithms under equal and unequal evolutionary rates.
    Kuhner MK; Felsenstein J
    Mol Biol Evol; 1994 May; 11(3):459-68. PubMed ID: 8015439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Bayesian and maximum likelihood phylogenetic analyses of protein sequence data under relative branch-length differences and model violation.
    Mar JC; Harlow TJ; Ragan MA
    BMC Evol Biol; 2005 Jan; 5():8. PubMed ID: 15676079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Outgroup misplacement and phylogenetic inaccuracy under a molecular clock--a simulation study.
    Holland BR; Penny D; Hendy MD
    Syst Biol; 2003 Apr; 52(2):229-38. PubMed ID: 12746148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A penalty of using anonymous dominant markers (AFLPs, ISSRs, and RAPDs) for phylogenetic inference.
    Simmons MP; Zhang LB; Webb CT; Müller K
    Mol Phylogenet Evol; 2007 Feb; 42(2):528-42. PubMed ID: 16997581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluating the relationship between evolutionary divergence and phylogenetic accuracy in AFLP data sets.
    García-Pereira MJ; Caballero A; Quesada H
    Mol Biol Evol; 2010 May; 27(5):988-1000. PubMed ID: 20026482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The robustness of two phylogenetic methods: four-taxon simulations reveal a slight superiority of maximum likelihood over neighbor joining.
    Huelsenbeck JP
    Mol Biol Evol; 1995 Sep; 12(5):843-9. PubMed ID: 7476130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Phylogenetic analysis using parsimony and likelihood methods.
    Yang Z
    J Mol Evol; 1996 Feb; 42(2):294-307. PubMed ID: 8919881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Heterogeneity of nucleotide frequencies among evolutionary lineages and phylogenetic inference.
    Rosenberg MS; Kumar S
    Mol Biol Evol; 2003 Apr; 20(4):610-21. PubMed ID: 12679548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Theoretical and Practical Considerations when using Retroelement Insertions to Estimate Species Trees in the Anomaly Zone.
    Molloy EK; Gatesy J; Springer MS
    Syst Biol; 2022 Apr; 71(3):721-740. PubMed ID: 34677617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Phylogenetic analysis in molecular evolutionary genetics.
    Nei M
    Annu Rev Genet; 1996; 30():371-403. PubMed ID: 8982459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Is it better to add taxa or characters to a difficult phylogenetic problem?
    Graybeal A
    Syst Biol; 1998 Mar; 47(1):9-17. PubMed ID: 12064243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Heterotachy and long-branch attraction in phylogenetics.
    Philippe H; Zhou Y; Brinkmann H; Rodrigue N; Delsuc F
    BMC Evol Biol; 2005 Oct; 5():50. PubMed ID: 16209710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Most Parsimonious Likelihood Exhibits Multiple Optima for Compatible Characters.
    Matsieva J; St John K
    Bull Math Biol; 2020 Jan; 82(1):10. PubMed ID: 31932987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The devil in the details: interactions between the branch-length prior and likelihood model affect node support and branch lengths in the phylogeny of the Psoraceae.
    Ekman S; Blaalid R
    Syst Biol; 2011 Jul; 60(4):541-61. PubMed ID: 21436107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Failed refutations: further comments on parsimony and likelihood methods and their relationship to Popper's degree of corroboration.
    de Queiroz K; Poe S
    Syst Biol; 2003 Jun; 52(3):352-67. PubMed ID: 12775524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Limitations of locally sampled characters in phylogenetic analyses of sparse supermatrices.
    Simmons MP
    Mol Phylogenet Evol; 2014 May; 74():1-14. PubMed ID: 24530637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The accuracy of methods for coding and sampling higher-level taxa for phylogenetic analysis: a simulation study.
    Wiens JJ
    Syst Biol; 1998 Sep; 47(3):397-413. PubMed ID: 12066685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.