BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

109 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12064503)

  • 1. Prediction of mandibular growth in Japanese children age 4 to 9 years.
    Oueis H; Ono Y; Takagi Y
    Pediatr Dent; 2002; 24(3):264-8. PubMed ID: 12064503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Reliability of growth prediction with hand-wrist radiographs.
    Verma D; Peltomäki T; Jäger A
    Eur J Orthod; 2009 Aug; 31(4):438-42. PubMed ID: 19395369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Predicting the pharyngeal airway space after mandibular setback surgery.
    Chen F; Terada K; Hanada K; Saito I
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2005 Oct; 63(10):1509-14. PubMed ID: 16182920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Mandibular morphology and growth with and without hypodontia in subjects with Pierre Robin sequence.
    Suri S; Ross RB; Tompson BD
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Jul; 130(1):37-46. PubMed ID: 16849070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Transverse growth of the maxilla and mandible in untreated girls with low, average, and high MP-SN angles: a longitudinal study.
    Wagner DM; Chung CH
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Dec; 128(6):716-23; quiz 801. PubMed ID: 16360911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. An accurate method of predicting mandibular growth potential based on bone maturity.
    Sato K; Mito T; Mitani H
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2001 Sep; 120(3):286-93. PubMed ID: 11552128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Soft and hard tissue changes after bimaxillary surgery in Turkish female Class III patients.
    Marşan G; Cura N; Emekli U
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2009 Jan; 37(1):8-17. PubMed ID: 18786833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Craniofacial features of subjects with adenoid, tonsillar, or adenotonsillar hypertrophy.
    Baroni M; Ballanti F; Franchi L; Cozza P
    Prog Orthod; 2011; 12(1):38-44. PubMed ID: 21515230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Relationship between formation and eruption of permanent mandibular buccal dentition and vertical height of the mandibular body: longitudinal study of Japanese boys from 4 to 9 years of age.
    Takeshima T; Suda N; Ishikawa M; Takagi Y; Ohyama K
    World J Orthod; 2004; 5(4):332-8. PubMed ID: 15633380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Determination of craniofacial growth in patients with untreated Class III malocclusions and anterior crossbites using the centroid method.
    Murata S
    Eur J Orthod; 2009 Oct; 31(5):496-502. PubMed ID: 19549679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Assessment of symphysis morphology as a predictor of the direction of mandibular growth.
    Aki T; Nanda RS; Currier GF; Nanda SK
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1994 Jul; 106(1):60-9. PubMed ID: 8017351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The G-Axis: a growth vector for the mandible.
    Braun S; Kittleson R; Kim K
    Angle Orthod; 2004 Jun; 74(3):328-31. PubMed ID: 15264642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Average craniofacial development from 6 to 35 years of age in a mixed group of patients with juvenile idiopathic arthritis.
    Fjeld MG; Arvidsson LZ; Stabrun AE; Birkeland K; Larheim TA; Øgaard B
    Acta Odontol Scand; 2009; 67(3):153-60. PubMed ID: 19241184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Does hyoid bone resection according to Sistrunk influence normal craniofacial growth? A cephalometric study.
    Joss-Vassalli IM; Joss CU; Gebauer U
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Oct; 67(10):2275-82. PubMed ID: 19761923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Correlation of gonial angle size with cortical thickness, height of the mandibular residual body, and duration of edentulism.
    Xie QF; Ainamo A
    J Prosthet Dent; 2004 May; 91(5):477-82. PubMed ID: 15153856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Semilongitudinal cephalometric study of craniofacial growth in untreated Class III malocclusion.
    Alexander AE; McNamara JA; Franchi L; Baccetti T
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Jun; 135(6):700.e1-14; discussion 700-1. PubMed ID: 19524825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Cephalometric variables to predict future success of early orthopedic Class III treatment.
    Ghiz MA; Ngan P; Gunel E
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Mar; 127(3):301-6. PubMed ID: 15775944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Development and testing of multilevel models for longitudinal craniofacial growth prediction.
    Chvatal BA; Behrents RG; Ceen RF; Buschang PH
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Jul; 128(1):45-56. PubMed ID: 16027625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Prediction of mandibular third-molar impaction in adolescent orthodontic patients.
    Behbehani F; Artun J; Thalib L
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Jul; 130(1):47-55. PubMed ID: 16849071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Craniofacial growth in untreated skeletal Class II subjects: a longitudinal study.
    Chung CH; Wong WW
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2002 Dec; 122(6):619-26. PubMed ID: 12490873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.