BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

109 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12064503)

  • 21. Pubertal growth of the cephalometric point gnathion: multilevel models for boys and girls.
    Buschang PH; Tanguay R; Demirjian A; LaPalme L; Goldstein H
    Am J Phys Anthropol; 1988 Nov; 77(3):347-54. PubMed ID: 3067586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The influence of functional orthodontics and mandibular sagittal split advancement osteotomy on dental and skeletal variables--a comparative cephalometric study.
    Lohrmann B; Schwestka-Polly R; Nägerl H; Ihlow D; Kubein-Meesenburg D
    Eur J Orthod; 2006 Dec; 28(6):553-60. PubMed ID: 17142259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Analysis of efficacy of functional appliances on mandibular growth.
    Chen JY; Will LA; Niederman R
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2002 Nov; 122(5):470-6. PubMed ID: 12439474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. A new method of predicting mandibular length increment on the basis of cervical vertebrae.
    Chen F; Terada K; Hanada K
    Angle Orthod; 2004 Oct; 74(5):630-4. PubMed ID: 15529497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. [Predicting of growth tendency with cephalometry. Cephalometric research comparing orthodontic treatment cases with four premolar extraction].
    Szabó GT; Herényi G; Szabó G
    Fogorv Sz; 2007 Feb; 100(1):11-5. PubMed ID: 17444131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Accuracy of predicting the pharyngeal airway space on the cephalogram after mandibular setback surgery.
    Muto T; Yamazaki A; Takeda S; Sato Y
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2008 Jun; 66(6):1099-103. PubMed ID: 18486773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The P561T polymorphism of the growth hormone receptor gene has an inhibitory effect on mandibular growth in young children.
    Sasaki Y; Satoh K; Hayasaki H; Fukumoto S; Fujiwara T; Nonaka K
    Eur J Orthod; 2009 Oct; 31(5):536-41. PubMed ID: 19447840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Orthodontic treatment changes of chin position in Class II Division 1 patients.
    LaHaye MB; Buschang PH; Alexander RG; Boley JC
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Dec; 130(6):732-41. PubMed ID: 17169735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Craniofacial development in obese adolescents.
    Sadeghianrizi A; Forsberg CM; Marcus C; Dahllöf G
    Eur J Orthod; 2005 Dec; 27(6):550-5. PubMed ID: 16009667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Long-term comparison of treatment outcome and stability of Class II patients treated with functional appliances versus bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy.
    Berger JL; Pangrazio-Kulbersh V; George C; Kaczynski R
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Apr; 127(4):451-64; quiz 516-7. PubMed ID: 15821690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The relationship of distinct craniofacial features between Turner syndrome females and their parents.
    Perkiömäki MR; Kyrkanides S; Niinimaa A; Alvesalo L
    Eur J Orthod; 2005 Feb; 27(1):48-52. PubMed ID: 15743862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Age-related changes in sagittal relationship between the maxilla and mandible.
    Lux CJ; Burden D; Conradt C; Komposch G
    Eur J Orthod; 2005 Dec; 27(6):568-78. PubMed ID: 16093257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Craniofacial changes in Icelandic children between 6 and 16 years of age - a longitudinal study.
    Thordarson A; Johannsdottir B; Magnusson TE
    Eur J Orthod; 2006 Apr; 28(2):152-65. PubMed ID: 16230326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Stability of hard tissue profile after mandibular setback in sagittal split osteotomies: a longitudinal and long-term follow-up study.
    Joss CU; Thüer UW
    Eur J Orthod; 2008 Aug; 30(4):352-8. PubMed ID: 18678756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Effects of activator and high-pull headgear combination therapy: skeletal, dentoalveolar, and soft tissue profile changes.
    Marşan G
    Eur J Orthod; 2007 Apr; 29(2):140-8. PubMed ID: 17488997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Cephalometric assessment of the mandibular growth pattern in mouth-breathing children.
    Sousa JB; Anselmo-Lima WT; Valera FC; Gallego AJ; Matsumoto MA
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2005 Mar; 69(3):311-7. PubMed ID: 15733589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Third molar angulation during and after treatment of adolescent orthodontic patients.
    Artun J; Thalib L; Little RM
    Eur J Orthod; 2005 Dec; 27(6):590-6. PubMed ID: 16009666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Relationship between the direction of mandibular growth and masseter muscle conduction velocity.
    Konno M; Sato K; Mito T; Mitani H
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Jul; 128(1):35-43; discussion 43-4. PubMed ID: 16027623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Soft tissue profile changes after vertical ramus osteotomy.
    Naoumova J; Söderfeldt B; Lindman R
    Eur J Orthod; 2008 Aug; 30(4):359-65. PubMed ID: 18524760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. An evaluation of maxillary and mandibular rotational responses with the Clark twin block appliance.
    Lau EY; Sampson WJ; Townsend GC; Hughes T
    Aust Orthod J; 2009 May; 25(1):48-58. PubMed ID: 19634464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.