109 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12064503)
41. Evaluation of the linearity of soft- to hard-tissue movement after orthognathic surgery.
Chew MT; Sandham A; Wong HB
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Nov; 134(5):665-70. PubMed ID: 18984399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Development of the curve of Spee.
Marshall SD; Caspersen M; Hardinger RR; Franciscus RG; Aquilino SA; Southard TE
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Sep; 134(3):344-52. PubMed ID: 18774080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Prediction of post-treatment outcome after combined treatment with maxillary protraction and chincap appliances.
Yoshida I; Yamaguchi N; Mizoguchi I
Eur J Orthod; 2006 Feb; 28(1):89-96. PubMed ID: 16113036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Prediction of mandibular growth rotation: assessment of the Skieller, Björk, and Linde-Hansen method.
Leslie LR; Southard TE; Southard KA; Casko JS; Jakobsen JR; Tolley EA; Hillis SL; Carolan C; Logue M
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1998 Dec; 114(6):659-67. PubMed ID: 9844205
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Is postadolescent mandibular anterior growth rotation a risk factor for relapse of incisor alignment in males?
Fudalej P
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Aug; 134(2):245-50. PubMed ID: 18675206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. [Changes in the value of the mandibular angle and its segments during growth].
Muretić Z; Rak D
Acta Stomatol Croat; 1991; 25(4):219-24. PubMed ID: 1819952
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. [Relationship between late adolescent growth of mandible and maturity indicators--mandibular third molar, hand bones, body height--in Japanese boys].
Sato K; Mitani H
Nihon Kyosei Shika Gakkai Zasshi; 1990 Apr; 49(2):140-6. PubMed ID: 2133872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. A special method of predicting mandibular growth potential for Class III malocclusion.
Chen F; Terada K; Hanada K
Angle Orthod; 2005 Mar; 75(2):191-5. PubMed ID: 15825781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. [The clivus-sphenoidale angle in children (postnatal flexion of the cranial base)].
Watanabe IS; Madeira MC; Watanabe IS; Madeira MC
Rev Bras Pesqui Med Biol; 1977; 10(5):325-9. PubMed ID: 563611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Elliptic Fourier analysis of mandibular shape.
Ferrario VF; Sforza C; Guazzi M; Serrao G
J Craniofac Genet Dev Biol; 1996; 16(4):208-17. PubMed ID: 8897210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. [Longitudinal genetic effects on mandibular position of female twins from six to twelve years old].
Zhu CF; Peng J
Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2013 Jun; 31(3):260-6. PubMed ID: 23841297
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Parental data used to predict growth of craniofacial form.
Suzuki A; Takahama Y
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1991 Feb; 99(2):107-21. PubMed ID: 1990820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Quantitative description of the shape of the mandible.
Halazonetis DJ; Shapiro E; Gheewalla RK; Clark RE
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1991 Jan; 99(1):49-56. PubMed ID: 1986526
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Predicting mandibular growth increment on the basis of cervical vertebral dimensions in Iranian girls.
Moshfeghi M; Rahimi H; Rahimi H; Nouri M; Bagheban AA
Prog Orthod; 2013 May; 14(1):3. PubMed ID: 24326181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Prediction of mandibular growth rotation evaluated from a longitudinal implant sample.
Skieller V; Björk A; Linde-Hansen T
Am J Orthod; 1984 Nov; 86(5):359-70. PubMed ID: 6594058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Comments on the frontal sinus and mandibular growth prediction.
Meithke RR
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1993 May; 103(5):20A-22A. PubMed ID: 8480708
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
57. Distance M-Me: A novel parameter having significant potential as a predictor of mandibular growth.
Jain P; Kaul R; Mukhopadhyay S; Saha S; Sarkar S
Indian J Dent Res; 2017; 28(3):320-324. PubMed ID: 28721999
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. [Biomorphosis of the mandible].
Lang J; Oder M
Gegenbaurs Morphol Jahrb; 1984; 130(2):185-234. PubMed ID: 6724279
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Evaluation of craniometric methods for determination of vertical dimension of occlusion.
Delić Z; Simunović-Soskić M; Perinić-Grzić R; Vukovojac S; Rajić Z; Kuna T; Kuna T
Coll Antropol; 2000 Jul; 24 Suppl 1():31-5. PubMed ID: 10946462
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. [The measurement of normal values of exophthalmos, interpupillary distance and interorbital distance of children and adolescence in Xiamen and the rule of their development].
Zhang M; Hong R; Fu Z; Ye M; Yang H
Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi; 2000 Nov; 36(6):462-6. PubMed ID: 11853651
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
