167 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12066083)
1. Subcutaneous stitch closure versus subcutaneous drain to prevent wound disruption after cesarean delivery: a randomized clinical trial.
Magann EF; Chauhan SP; Rodts-Palenik S; Bufkin L; Martin JN; Morrison JC
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2002 Jun; 186(6):1119-23. PubMed ID: 12066083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Subcutaneous drain vs. suture in obese women undergoing cesarean delivery. A prospective, randomized trial.
Allaire AD; Fisch J; McMahon MJ
J Reprod Med; 2000 Apr; 45(4):327-31. PubMed ID: 10804490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Skin and subcutaneous fascia closure at caesarean section to reduce wound complications: the closure randomised trial.
Poprzeczny AJ; Grivell RM; Louise J; Deussen AR; Dodd JM
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2020 Oct; 20(1):606. PubMed ID: 33032560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Subcutaneous tissue reapproximation, alone or in combination with drain, in obese women undergoing cesarean delivery.
Ramsey PS; White AM; Guinn DA; Lu GC; Ramin SM; Davies JK; Neely CL; Newby C; Fonseca L; Case AS; Kaslow RA; Kirby RS; Rouse DJ; Hauth JC
Obstet Gynecol; 2005 May; 105(5 Pt 1):967-73. PubMed ID: 15863532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Prophylactic subcutaneous drainage for prevention of wound complications after cesarean delivery--a metaanalysis.
Hellums EK; Lin MG; Ramsey PS
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Sep; 197(3):229-35. PubMed ID: 17826401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Superficial wound disruption after cesarean delivery: effect of the depth and closure of subcutaneous tissue.
Cetin A; Cetin M
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 1997 Apr; 57(1):17-21. PubMed ID: 9175664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Impact of evidence-based interventions on wound complications after cesarean delivery.
Temming LA; Raghuraman N; Carter EB; Stout MJ; Rampersad RM; Macones GA; Cahill AG; Tuuli MG
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Oct; 217(4):449.e1-449.e9. PubMed ID: 28601567
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of suture materials for subcuticular skin closure at cesarean delivery.
Tuuli MG; Stout MJ; Martin S; Rampersad RM; Cahill AG; Macones GA
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Oct; 215(4):490.e1-5. PubMed ID: 27179440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Suture closure of subcutaneous fat and wound disruption after cesarean delivery: a meta-analysis.
Chelmow D; Rodriguez EJ; Sabatini MM
Obstet Gynecol; 2004 May; 103(5 Pt 1):974-80. PubMed ID: 15121573
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Suture Compared With Staple Closure of Skin Incision for High-Order Cesarean Deliveries.
Fox NS; Melka S; Miller J; Bender S; Silverstein M; Saltzman DH; Rebarber A
Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Mar; 131(3):523-528. PubMed ID: 29420412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Clinical Equivalence of Polyglycolic Acid Suture and Polyglactin 910 Suture for Subcutaneous Tissue Closure After Cesarean Delivery: A Single-Blind Randomized Study.
Devi CHRV; Ray R; Koduri S; Moharana AK; Ts D
Med Devices (Auckl); 2023; 16():27-36. PubMed ID: 36741332
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Subcutaneous stitch closure versus subcutaneous drain to prevent wound disruption after cesarean delivery: a randomized clinical trial.
White AM; Ramsey PS
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2003 Mar; 188(3):861-2; author reply 862. PubMed ID: 12634684
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Role of subcutaneous closure in preventing wound complications after cesarean delivery with Pfannenstiel incision: a randomized clinical trial.
Corbacioglu Esmer A; Goksedef PC; Akca A; Akbayir O; Dagdeviren H; Turan GY; Yarsilikal F
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2014 Mar; 40(3):728-35. PubMed ID: 24738117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Subcutaneous tissue approximation in relation to wound disruption after cesarean delivery in obese women.
Naumann RW; Hauth JC; Owen J; Hodgkins PM; Lincoln T
Obstet Gynecol; 1995 Mar; 85(3):412-6. PubMed ID: 7862382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Skin closure at cesarean delivery, glue vs subcuticular sutures: a randomized controlled trial.
Daykan Y; Sharon-Weiner M; Pasternak Y; Tzadikevitch-Geffen K; Markovitch O; Sukenik-Halevy R; Biron-Shental T
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Apr; 216(4):406.e1-406.e5. PubMed ID: 28153666
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Value of subcutaneous drainage system in obese females undergoing cesarean section using pfannenstiel incision.
Al-Inany H; Youssef G; Abd ElMaguid A; Abdel Hamid M; Naguib A
Gynecol Obstet Invest; 2002; 53(2):75-8. PubMed ID: 11961377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Suture versus staples for skin closure after cesarean: a metaanalysis.
Mackeen AD; Schuster M; Berghella V
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2015 May; 212(5):621.e1-10. PubMed ID: 25530592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of staples vs subcuticular suture in class III obese women undergoing cesarean: a randomized controlled trial.
Zaki MN; Wing DA; McNulty JA
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Apr; 218(4):451.e1-451.e8. PubMed ID: 29474843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Incidence of wound complications in cesarean deliveries following closure with absorbable subcuticular staples versus conventional skin closure techniques.
Schrufer-Poland TL; Ruiz MP; Kassar S; Tomassian C; Algren SD; Yeast JD
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2016 Nov; 206():53-56. PubMed ID: 27632411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Clinical Equivalence of Trusynth® and Vicryl® Polyglactin 910 Sutures for Subcutaneous Tissue Closure During Cesarean Delivery: A Single-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial.
DCunha P; Silpa KP; Gadwalker SM; Moharana AK; Ts D
Cureus; 2023 Jun; 15(6):e39982. PubMed ID: 37416026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
