264 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12066104)
1. Factors affecting the likelihood of successful induction after intravaginal misoprostol application for cervical ripening and labor induction.
Wing DA; Tran S; Paul RH
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2002 Jun; 186(6):1237-40; discussion 1240-3. PubMed ID: 12066104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Predictors of successful labor induction with oral or vaginal misoprostol.
Crane JM; Delaney T; Butt KD; Bennett KA; Hutchens D; Young DC
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2004 May; 15(5):319-23. PubMed ID: 15280123
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A comparison of orally administered misoprostol with vaginally administered misoprostol for cervical ripening and labor induction.
Wing DA; Ham D; Paul RH
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1999 May; 180(5):1155-60. PubMed ID: 10329871
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Induction of labor using one dose vs multiple doses of misoprostol: a randomized controlled trial.
Pimentel VM; Arabkhazaeli M; Moon JY; Wang A; Kapedani A; Bernstein PS; Tropper PJ
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Jun; 218(6):614.e1-614.e8. PubMed ID: 29614276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Randomized comparison of misoprostol and dinoprostone for preinduction cervical ripening and labor induction.
Chang CH; Chang FM
J Formos Med Assoc; 1997 May; 96(5):366-9. PubMed ID: 9170825
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effect of vaginal pH on efficacy of misoprostol for cervical ripening and labor induction.
Ramsey PS; Ogburn PL; Harris DY; Heise RH; Ramin KD
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2000 Jun; 182(6):1616-9. PubMed ID: 10871486
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Predicting factors on cervical ripening and response to induction in women pregnant over 37 weeks.
Bahadori F; Ayatollahi H; Naghavi-Behzad M; Khalkhali H; Naseri Z
Med Ultrason; 2013 Sep; 15(3):191-8. PubMed ID: 23979614
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Labor induction post-term with 25 micrograms vs. 50 micrograms of intravaginal misoprostol.
Meydanli MM; Calişkan E; Burak F; Narin MA; Atmaca R
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2003 Jun; 81(3):249-55. PubMed ID: 12767565
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Bishop score and the outcome of labor induction with misoprostol.
Szczesny W; Kjøllesdal M; Karlsson B; Nielsen S
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2006; 85(5):579-82. PubMed ID: 16752237
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison between vaginal and sublingual misoprostol 50 µg for cervical ripening prior to induction of labor: randomized clinical trial.
Conde A; Ben S; Tarigo J; Artucio S; Varela V; Grimaldi P; Sosa C; Alonso J
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2017 Apr; 295(4):839-844. PubMed ID: 28204882
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Intravaginal administration of isosorbide mononitrate and misoprostol for cervical ripening and induction of labour: a randomized controlled trial.
Abdellah MS; Hussien M; Aboalhassan A
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2011 Jul; 284(1):25-30. PubMed ID: 20582425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A comparison of intermittent vaginal administration of two different doses of misoprostol suppositories with continuous dinoprostone for cervical ripening and labor induction.
Khoury AN; Zhou QP; Gorenberg DM; Nies BM; Manley GE; Mecklenburg FE
J Matern Fetal Med; 2001 Jun; 10(3):186-92. PubMed ID: 11444788
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Randomized comparison between intravaginal misoprostol and dinoprostone for cervical ripening and induction of labor.
Nunes F; Rodrigues R; Meirinho M
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1999 Sep; 181(3):626-9. PubMed ID: 10486474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Factors predicting successful labor induction with dinoprostone and misoprostol vaginal inserts.
Pevzner L; Rayburn WF; Rumney P; Wing DA
Obstet Gynecol; 2009 Aug; 114(2 Pt 1):261-267. PubMed ID: 19622986
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Intravaginal misoprostol versus Foley catheter for cervical ripening and induction of labor.
Afolabi BB; Oyeneyin OL; Ogedengbe OK
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2005 Jun; 89(3):263-7. PubMed ID: 15919393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Labor induction with 25 microg versus 50 microg intravaginal misoprostol: a systematic review.
Sanchez-Ramos L; Kaunitz AM; Delke I
Obstet Gynecol; 2002 Jan; 99(1):145-51. PubMed ID: 11777525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Combination of Foley bulb and vaginal misoprostol compared with vaginal misoprostol alone for cervical ripening and labor induction: a randomized controlled trial.
Carbone JF; Tuuli MG; Fogertey PJ; Roehl KA; Macones GA
Obstet Gynecol; 2013 Feb; 121(2 Pt 1):247-252. PubMed ID: 23303106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Induction of labor in toxemia with misoprostol.
Sahin HG; Sahin HA; Kocer M
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2002 Mar; 81(3):252-7. PubMed ID: 11966483
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison between vaginal misoprostol and cervical dinoprostone for cervical ripening and labor induction.
Neiger R; Greaves PC
Tenn Med; 2001 Jan; 94(1):25-7. PubMed ID: 11194687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Vaginal misoprostol administration for cervical ripening and labor induction.
Wing DA; Gaffaney CA
Clin Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Sep; 49(3):627-41. PubMed ID: 16885668
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
