These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12066303)

  • 1. Step matrices and the interpretation of homoplasy.
    Ree RH; Donoghue MJ
    Syst Biol; 1998 Dec; 47(4):582-8. PubMed ID: 12066303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. On defining a unique phylogenetic tree with homoplastic characters.
    Goloboff PA; Wilkinson M
    Mol Phylogenet Evol; 2018 May; 122():95-101. PubMed ID: 29407481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Parametric maximum parsimonious reconstruction on trees.
    Didier G
    Bull Math Biol; 2011 Jul; 73(7):1477-502. PubMed ID: 20737226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The size of the character state space affects the occurrence and detection of homoplasy: modelling the probability of incompatibility for unordered phylogenetic characters.
    Hoyal Cuthill J
    J Theor Biol; 2015 Feb; 366():24-32. PubMed ID: 25451518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. THE RECONSTRUCTION OF ANCESTRAL CHARACTER STATES.
    Schultz TR; Cocroft RB; Churchill GA
    Evolution; 1996 Apr; 50(2):504-511. PubMed ID: 28568917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A reconsideration of inapplicable characters, and an approximation with step-matrix recoding.
    Goloboff PA; De Laet J; Ríos-Tamayo D; Szumik CA
    Cladistics; 2021 Oct; 37(5):596-629. PubMed ID: 34570932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Interactive analysis of phylogeny and character evolution using the computer program MacClade.
    Maddison WP; Maddison DR
    Folia Primatol (Basel); 1989; 53(1-4):190-202. PubMed ID: 2606395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Bayesian estimation of ancestral character states on phylogenies.
    Pagel M; Meade A; Barker D
    Syst Biol; 2004 Oct; 53(5):673-84. PubMed ID: 15545248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. EXAMINING TWO STANDARD ASSUMPTIONS OF ANCESTRAL RECONSTRUCTIONS: REPEATED LOSS OF DICHROMATISM IN DABBLING DUCKS (ANATINI).
    Omland KE
    Evolution; 1997 Oct; 51(5):1636-1646. PubMed ID: 28568615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Recent developments in the analysis of comparative data.
    Pagel MD; Harvey PH
    Q Rev Biol; 1988 Dec; 63(4):413-40. PubMed ID: 3068704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Grass evolution inferred from chromosomal rearrangements and geometrical and statistical features in RNA structure.
    Caetano-Anollés G
    J Mol Evol; 2005 May; 60(5):635-52. PubMed ID: 15983872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Failed refutations: further comments on parsimony and likelihood methods and their relationship to Popper's degree of corroboration.
    de Queiroz K; Poe S
    Syst Biol; 2003 Jun; 52(3):352-67. PubMed ID: 12775524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Foundations of the new phylogenetics].
    Pavlinov IIa
    Zh Obshch Biol; 2004; 65(4):334-66. PubMed ID: 15490579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Biases of tree-independent-character-subsampling methods.
    Simmons MP; Gatesy J
    Mol Phylogenet Evol; 2016 Jul; 100():424-443. PubMed ID: 27103257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Trends in morphological evolution in homobasidiomycetes inferred using maximum likelihood: a comparison of binary and multistate approaches.
    Hibbett D
    Syst Biol; 2004 Dec; 53(6):889-903. PubMed ID: 15764558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Which came first: The lizard or the egg? Robustness in phylogenetic reconstruction of ancestral states.
    Wright AM; Lyons KM; Brandley MC; Hillis DM
    J Exp Zool B Mol Dev Evol; 2015 Sep; 324(6):504-16. PubMed ID: 26227660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Testing and quantifying phylogenetic signals and homoplasy in morphometric data.
    Klingenberg CP; Gidaszewski NA
    Syst Biol; 2010 May; 59(3):245-61. PubMed ID: 20525633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. TESTING FOR UNEQUAL AMOUNTS OF EVOLUTION IN A CONTINUOUS CHARACTER ON DIFFERENT BRANCHES OF A PHYLOGENETIC TREE USING LINEAR AND SQUARED-CHANGE PARSIMONY: AN EXAMPLE USING LESSER ANTILLEAN ANOLIS LIZARDS.
    Butler MA; Losos JB
    Evolution; 1997 Oct; 51(5):1623-1635. PubMed ID: 28568623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Cranial shape and correlated characters in crocodilian evolution.
    Sadleir RW; Makovicky PJ
    J Evol Biol; 2008 Nov; 21(6):1578-96. PubMed ID: 18808440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Why do morphological phylogenies vary in quality? An investigation based on the comparative history of lizard clades.
    Arnold EN
    Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 1990 May; 240(1297):135-72. PubMed ID: 1972988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.