156 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12066309)
1. Effects of branch length errors on the performance of phylogenetically independent contrasts.
Díaz-Uriarte R; Garland T
Syst Biol; 1998 Dec; 47(4):654-72. PubMed ID: 12066309
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Polytomies and phylogenetically independent contrasts: examination of the bounded degrees of freedom approach.
Garland T; Díaz-Uriarte R
Syst Biol; 1999 Sep; 48(3):547-58. PubMed ID: 12066293
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Assessment of the relative merits of a few methods to detect evolutionary trends.
Laurin M
Syst Biol; 2010 Dec; 59(6):689-704. PubMed ID: 20937759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. PHYLOGENETIC ANALYSES OF THE CORRELATED EVOLUTION OF CONTINUOUS CHARACTERS: A SIMULATION STUDY.
Martins EP; Garland T
Evolution; 1991 May; 45(3):534-557. PubMed ID: 28568838
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Testing for phylogenetic signal in comparative data: behavioral traits are more labile.
Blomberg SP; Garland T; Ives AR
Evolution; 2003 Apr; 57(4):717-45. PubMed ID: 12778543
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Taxon sampling, correlated evolution, and independent contrasts.
Ackerly DD
Evolution; 2000 Oct; 54(5):1480-92. PubMed ID: 11108577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Revisiting a Key Innovation in Evolutionary Biology: Felsenstein's "Phylogenies and the Comparative Method".
Huey RB; Garland T; Turelli M
Am Nat; 2019 Jun; 193(6):755-772. PubMed ID: 31094602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The Independent Evolution Method Is Not a Viable Phylogenetic Comparative Method.
Griffin RH; Yapuncich GS
PLoS One; 2015; 10(12):e0144147. PubMed ID: 26683838
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The gene tree delusion.
Springer MS; Gatesy J
Mol Phylogenet Evol; 2016 Jan; 94(Pt A):1-33. PubMed ID: 26238460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Utility of characters evolving at diverse rates of evolution to resolve quartet trees with unequal branch lengths: analytical predictions of long-branch effects.
Su Z; Townsend JP
BMC Evol Biol; 2015 May; 15():86. PubMed ID: 25968460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Robustness of compound Dirichlet priors for Bayesian inference of branch lengths.
Zhang C; Rannala B; Yang Z
Syst Biol; 2012 Oct; 61(5):779-84. PubMed ID: 22328570
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The devil in the details: interactions between the branch-length prior and likelihood model affect node support and branch lengths in the phylogeny of the Psoraceae.
Ekman S; Blaalid R
Syst Biol; 2011 Jul; 60(4):541-61. PubMed ID: 21436107
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Why the phylogenetic regression appears robust to tree misspecification.
Stone EA
Syst Biol; 2011 May; 60(3):245-60. PubMed ID: 21325220
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Relative efficiencies of the maximum-likelihood, neighbor-joining, and maximum-parsimony methods when substitution rate varies with site.
Tateno Y; Takezaki N; Nei M
Mol Biol Evol; 1994 Mar; 11(2):261-77. PubMed ID: 8170367
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Investigating evolutionary lag using the species-pairs evolutionary lag test (SPELT).
Nunn CL; Cooper N
Evolution; 2015 Jan; 69(1):245-53. PubMed ID: 25200679
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Adaptive constraints and the phylogenetic comparative method: a computer simulation test.
Martins EP; Diniz-Filho JA; Housworth EA
Evolution; 2002 Jan; 56(1):1-13. PubMed ID: 11913655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparative methods with sampling error and within-species variation: contrasts revisited and revised.
Felsenstein J
Am Nat; 2008 Jun; 171(6):713-25. PubMed ID: 18419518
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Phylogenetically nested comparisons for testing correlates of species richness: a simulation study of continuous variables.
Isaac NJ; Agapow PM; Harvey PH; Purvis A
Evolution; 2003 Jan; 57(1):18-26. PubMed ID: 12643564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Phylogeny, regression, and the allometry of physiological traits.
O'Connor MP; Agosta SJ; Hansen F; Kemp SJ; Sieg AE; McNair JN; Dunham AE
Am Nat; 2007 Sep; 170(3):431-42. PubMed ID: 17879193
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Tail paradox, partial identifiability, and influential priors in Bayesian branch length inference.
Rannala B; Zhu T; Yang Z
Mol Biol Evol; 2012 Jan; 29(1):325-35. PubMed ID: 21890479
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
