694 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12066489)
1. Mandibular overdentures: comparative evaluation of prosthodontic maintenance of three different implant systems during the first year of service.
Watson GK; Payne AG; Purton DG; Thomson WM
Int J Prosthodont; 2002; 15(3):259-66. PubMed ID: 12066489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Mandibular two-implant overdentures: prosthodontic maintenance using different loading protocols and attachment systems.
Mackie A; Lyons K; Thomson WM; Payne AG
Int J Prosthodont; 2011; 24(5):405-16. PubMed ID: 21909481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Mandibular overdentures: professional time for prosthodontic maintenance during the first year of service using three different implant systems.
Watson GK; Payne AG; Purton DG; Thomson WM
Int J Prosthodont; 2002; 15(4):379-84. PubMed ID: 12170853
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A clinical trial of patient satisfaction and prosthodontic needs with ball and bar attachments for implant-retained complete overdentures: three-year results.
MacEntee MI; Walton JN; Glick N
J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Jan; 93(1):28-37. PubMed ID: 15623995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Prosthodontic maintenance of overdentures on zirconia implants: 1-year results of a randomized controlled trial.
Osman RB; Ma S
Int J Prosthodont; 2014; 27(5):461-8. PubMed ID: 25191890
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The influence of bar design (round versus milled bar) on prosthodontic maintenance of mandibular overdentures supported by 4 implants: a 5-year prospective study.
Krennmair G; Krainhöfner M; Piehslinger E
Int J Prosthodont; 2008; 21(6):514-20. PubMed ID: 19149069
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Mandibular implant-supported overdentures: a prospective evaluation of the burden of prosthodontic maintenance with 3 different attachment systems.
Payne AG; Solomons YF
Int J Prosthodont; 2000; 13(3):246-53. PubMed ID: 11203640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The prosthodontic maintenance requirements of mandibular mucosa- and implant-supported overdentures: a review of the literature.
Payne AG; Solomons YF
Int J Prosthodont; 2000; 13(3):238-43. PubMed ID: 11203639
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Removable implant-prosthodontic rehabilitation of the edentulous mandible: five-year results of different prosthetic anchorage concepts.
Weinländer M; Piehslinger E; Krennmair G
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010; 25(3):589-97. PubMed ID: 20556260
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A randomized clinical trial comparing patient satisfaction and prosthetic outcomes with mandibular overdentures retained by one or two implants.
Walton JN; Glick N; Macentee MI
Int J Prosthodont; 2009; 22(4):331-9. PubMed ID: 19639067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of ball and telescopic crown attachments in implant-retained mandibular overdentures: a 5-year prospective study.
Krennmair G; Seemann R; Weinländer M; Piehslinger E
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(3):598-606. PubMed ID: 21691608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Immediate loading of implants with mandibular overdentures: one-year clinical results of a prospective study.
Attard NJ; David LA; Zarb GA
Int J Prosthodont; 2005; 18(6):463-70. PubMed ID: 16335163
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Maintenance of implant-supported maxillary prostheses: a 2-year controlled clinical trial.
Katsoulis J; Brunner A; Mericske-Stern R
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(3):648-56. PubMed ID: 21691613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The immediately loaded single implant-retained mandibular overdenture: a 36-month prospective study.
Liddelow G; Henry P
Int J Prosthodont; 2010; 23(1):13-21. PubMed ID: 20234886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The outcome of implant overdentures from a prosthodontic perspective: proposal for a classification protocol.
Payne AG; Walton TR; Walton JN; Solomons YF
Int J Prosthodont; 2001; 14(1):27-32. PubMed ID: 11842901
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Scanning electron microscopy observations of failures of implant overdenture bars: a case series report.
Waddell JN; Payne AG; Swain MV; Kieser JA
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2010 Mar; 12(1):26-38. PubMed ID: 20148915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Removable dentures with implant support in strategic positions followed for up to 8 years.
Kaufmann R; Friedli M; Hug S; Mericske-Stern R
Int J Prosthodont; 2009; 22(3):233-41; discussion 242. PubMed ID: 19548404
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. One-stage operative procedure using two different implant systems: a prospective study on implant overdentures in the edentulous mandible.
Tawse-Smith A; Perio C; Payne AG; Kumara R; Thomson WM
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2001; 3(4):185-93. PubMed ID: 11887655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Randomized, prospective, clinical evaluation of prosthodontic modalities for mandibular implant overdenture treatment.
Burns DR; Unger JW; Coffey JP; Waldrop TC; Elswick RK
J Prosthet Dent; 2011 Jul; 106(1):12-22. PubMed ID: 21723989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Implant-supported mandibular overdentures retained with ball or telescopic crown attachments: a 3-year prospective study.
Krennmair G; Weinländer M; Krainhöfner M; Piehslinger E
Int J Prosthodont; 2006; 19(2):164-70. PubMed ID: 16602365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
