459 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12066633)
1. Stress distribution on the metal framework of the implant-supported fixed prosthesis using different veneering materials.
Ciftçi Y; Canay S
Int J Prosthodont; 2001; 14(5):406-11. PubMed ID: 12066633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The influence of different core material on the FEA-determined stress distribution in dental crowns.
De Jager N; de Kler M; van der Zel JM
Dent Mater; 2006 Mar; 22(3):234-42. PubMed ID: 16099031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Stress analysis of metal-free polymer crowns using the three-dimensional finite element method.
Nakamura T; Imanishi A; Kashima H; Ohyama T; Ishigaki S
Int J Prosthodont; 2001; 14(5):401-5. PubMed ID: 12066632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Influence of prosthesis material on stress distribution in bone and implant: a 3-dimensional finite element analysis.
Stegaroiu R; Kusakari H; Nishiyama S; Miyakawa O
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1998; 13(6):781-90. PubMed ID: 9857588
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Biomechanical effects of two different collar implant structures on stress distribution under cantilever fixed partial dentures.
Merıç G; Erkmen E; Kurt A; Eser A; özden AU
Acta Odontol Scand; 2011 Nov; 69(6):374-84. PubMed ID: 21449688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The effect of veneering materials on stress distribution in implant-supported fixed prosthetic restorations.
Ciftçi Y; Canay S
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2000; 15(4):571-82. PubMed ID: 10960992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Finite element analysis study of the effect of superstructure material on stress distribution in an implant-supported fixed prosthesis.
Sertgöz A
Int J Prosthodont; 1997; 10(1):19-27. PubMed ID: 9484066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Influence of superstructure materials on strain around an implant under 2 loading conditions: a technical investigation.
Stegaroiu R; Khraisat A; Nomura S; Miyakawa O
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2004; 19(5):735-42. PubMed ID: 15508991
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effect of superstructure materials and misfit on stress distribution in a single implant-supported prosthesis: a finite element analysis.
Assunção WG; Gomes EA; Barão VA; Delben JA; Tabata LF; de Sousa EA
J Craniofac Surg; 2010 May; 21(3):689-95. PubMed ID: 20485030
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. An in vitro study of the effect of different restorative materials on the reliability of a veneering porcelain.
Anderson MR; Chung KH; Flinn BD; Raigrodski AJ
J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Dec; 110(6):521-8. PubMed ID: 24189113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effect of framework shape on the fracture strength of implant-supported all-ceramic fixed partial dentures in the molar region.
Tsumita M; Kokubo Y; Vult von Steyern P; Fukushima S
J Prosthodont; 2008 Jun; 17(4):274-85. PubMed ID: 18205740
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The effect of provisional restoration type on micromovement of implants.
Holst S; Geiselhoeringer H; Wichmann M; Holst AI
J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Sep; 100(3):173-82. PubMed ID: 18762029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Biomechanical comparison of implant retained fixed partial dentures with fiber reinforced composite versus conventional metal frameworks: a 3D FEA study.
Erkmen E; Meriç G; Kurt A; Tunç Y; Eser A
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2011 Jan; 4(1):107-16. PubMed ID: 21094484
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Impact of implant number, distribution and prosthesis material on loading on implants supporting fixed prostheses.
Ogawa T; Dhaliwal S; Naert I; Mine A; Kronstrom M; Sasaki K; Duyck J
J Oral Rehabil; 2010 Jul; 37(7):525-31. PubMed ID: 20236236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Adhesive bond of veneering composites on various metal surfaces using silicoating, titanium-coating or functional monomers.
Behr M; Rosentritt M; Gröger G; Handel G
J Dent; 2003 Jan; 31(1):33-42. PubMed ID: 12615018
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Shear bond strength evaluation of different veneering systems on Ni-Cr alloys.
Ciftçi Y; Canay S; Hersek N
J Prosthodont; 2007; 16(1):31-6. PubMed ID: 17244305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Finite element analysis of an implant-assisted removable partial denture during bilateral loading: occlusal rests position.
Shahmiri R; Das R; Aarts JM; Bennani V
J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Nov; 112(5):1126-33. PubMed ID: 24951387
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Structure and mechanical properties of Cresco-Ti laser-welded joints and stress analyses using finite element models of fixed distal extension and fixed partial prosthetic designs.
Uysal H; Kurtoglu C; Gurbuz R; Tutuncu N
J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Mar; 93(3):235-44. PubMed ID: 15775924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Influence of connector design and material composition and veneering on the stress distribution of all-ceramic fixed dental prostheses: a finite element study.
Möllers K; Pätzold W; Parkot D; Kirsten A; Güth JF; Edelhoff D; Fischer H
Dent Mater; 2011 Aug; 27(8):e171-5. PubMed ID: 21592550
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Influence of cusp inclination on stress distribution in implant-supported prostheses. A three-dimensional finite element analysis.
Falcón-Antenucci RM; Pellizzer EP; de Carvalho PS; Goiato MC; Noritomi PY
J Prosthodont; 2010 Jul; 19(5):381-6. PubMed ID: 20345742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
