485 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12066659)
1. A 5-year clinical study of indirect and direct resin composite and ceramic inlays.
Thordrup M; Isidor F; Hörsted-Bindslev P
Quintessence Int; 2001 Mar; 32(3):199-205. PubMed ID: 12066659
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A randomized 5-year clinical evaluation of 3 ceramic inlay systems.
Molin MK; Karlsson SL
Int J Prosthodont; 2000; 13(3):194-200. PubMed ID: 11203631
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A 3-year study of inlays milled from machinable ceramic blocks representing 2 different inlay systems.
Thordrup M; Isidor F; Hörsted-Bindslev P
Quintessence Int; 1999 Dec; 30(12):829-36. PubMed ID: 10765860
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Three-year evaluation of computer-machined ceramic inlays: influence of luting agent.
Zuellig-Singer R; Bryant RW
Quintessence Int; 1998 Sep; 29(9):573-82. PubMed ID: 9807141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A one-year clinical study of indirect and direct composite and ceramic inlays.
Thordrup M; Isidor F; Hörsted-Bindslev P
Scand J Dent Res; 1994 Jun; 102(3):186-92. PubMed ID: 8085126
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A prospective clinical study of indirect and direct composite and ceramic inlays: ten-year results.
Thordrup M; Isidor F; Hörsted-Bindslev P
Quintessence Int; 2006 Feb; 37(2):139-44. PubMed ID: 16475376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Direct resin composite restorations versus indirect composite inlays: one-year results.
Mendonça JS; Neto RG; Santiago SL; Lauris JR; Navarro MF; de Carvalho RM
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2010 May; 11(3):025-32. PubMed ID: 20461321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Long-term clinical results of chairside Cerec CAD/CAM inlays and onlays: a case series.
Otto T; Schneider D
Int J Prosthodont; 2008; 21(1):53-9. PubMed ID: 18350948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A 10-year prospective evaluation of CAD/CAM-manufactured (Cerec) ceramic inlays cemented with a chemically cured or dual-cured resin composite.
Sjögren G; Molin M; van Dijken JW
Int J Prosthodont; 2004; 17(2):241-6. PubMed ID: 15119879
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Leucite-reinforced glass ceramic inlays and onlays after six years: clinical behavior.
Frankenberger R; Petschelt A; Krämer N
Oper Dent; 2000; 25(6):459-65. PubMed ID: 11203857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Operator vs. material influence on clinical outcome of bonded ceramic inlays.
Frankenberger R; Reinelt C; Petschelt A; Krämer N
Dent Mater; 2009 Aug; 25(8):960-8. PubMed ID: 19344946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Eight-year clinical evaluation of fired ceramic inlays.
Hayashi M; Tsuchitani Y; Kawamura Y; Miura M; Takeshige F; Ebisu S
Oper Dent; 2000; 25(6):473-81. PubMed ID: 11203859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of strength and adhesion of composite resin versus ceramic inlays in molars.
Dejak B; Mlotkowski A
J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Feb; 99(2):131-40. PubMed ID: 18262014
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Computer-aided direct ceramic restorations: a 10-year prospective clinical study of Cerec CAD/CAM inlays and onlays.
Otto T; De Nisco S
Int J Prosthodont; 2002; 15(2):122-8. PubMed ID: 11951800
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Computer-aided designed/computer-assisted manufactured composite resin versus ceramic single-tooth restorations: a 3-year clinical study.
Vanoorbeek S; Vandamme K; Lijnen I; Naert I
Int J Prosthodont; 2010; 23(3):223-30. PubMed ID: 20552087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. In vitro evaluation of push-out bond strength of direct ceramic inlays to tooth surface with fiber-reinforced composite at the interface.
Cekic I; Ergun G; Uctasli S; Lassila LV
J Prosthet Dent; 2007 May; 97(5):271-8. PubMed ID: 17547945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Clinical evaluation of ceramic inlays and onlays fabricated with two systems: five-year follow-up.
Santos MJ; Mondelli RF; Navarro MF; Francischone CE; Rubo JH; Santos GC
Oper Dent; 2013; 38(1):3-11. PubMed ID: 22856680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Retention of zirconium oxide ceramic crowns with three types of cement.
Palacios RP; Johnson GH; Phillips KM; Raigrodski AJ
J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Aug; 96(2):104-14. PubMed ID: 16911887
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Ceramic inlays bonded with two adhesives after 4 years.
Krämer N; Ebert J; Petschelt A; Frankenberger R
Dent Mater; 2006 Jan; 22(1):13-21. PubMed ID: 16122784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Interfacial gaps following ceramic inlay cementation vs direct composites.
Iida K; Inokoshi S; Kurosaki N
Oper Dent; 2003; 28(4):445-52. PubMed ID: 12877431
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
