237 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12066698)
1. Implant angulation: a measurement technique, implant overdenture maintenance, and the influence of surgical experience.
Walton JN; Huizinga SC; Peck CC
Int J Prosthodont; 2001; 14(6):523-30. PubMed ID: 12066698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A clinical trial of patient satisfaction and prosthodontic needs with ball and bar attachments for implant-retained complete overdentures: three-year results.
MacEntee MI; Walton JN; Glick N
J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Jan; 93(1):28-37. PubMed ID: 15623995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Mandibular overdentures: comparative evaluation of prosthodontic maintenance of three different implant systems during the first year of service.
Watson GK; Payne AG; Purton DG; Thomson WM
Int J Prosthodont; 2002; 15(3):259-66. PubMed ID: 12066489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A longitudinal study on mandibular implants supporting an overdenture: the influence of retention mechanism and anatomic-prosthetic variables on periimplant parameters.
Oetterli M; Kiener P; Mericske-Stern R
Int J Prosthodont; 2001; 14(6):536-42. PubMed ID: 12066700
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. One-year prosthetic outcomes with implant overdentures: a randomized clinical trial.
Walton JN; MacEntee MI; Glick N
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2002; 17(3):391-8. PubMed ID: 12074455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Implant-supported mandibular overdentures retained with ball or telescopic crown attachments: a 3-year prospective study.
Krennmair G; Weinländer M; Krainhöfner M; Piehslinger E
Int J Prosthodont; 2006; 19(2):164-70. PubMed ID: 16602365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effect of implant angulation upon retention of overdenture attachments.
Gulizio MP; Agar JR; Kelly JR; Taylor TD
J Prosthodont; 2005 Mar; 14(1):3-11. PubMed ID: 15733129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Mandibular implant-supported overdentures: a prospective evaluation of the burden of prosthodontic maintenance with 3 different attachment systems.
Payne AG; Solomons YF
Int J Prosthodont; 2000; 13(3):246-53. PubMed ID: 11203640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Five-year clinical results of immediately loaded dental implants using mandibular overdentures.
Alfadda SA; Attard NJ; David LA
Int J Prosthodont; 2009; 22(4):368-73. PubMed ID: 19639074
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Bone level changes at axial- and non-axial-positioned implants supporting fixed partial dentures. A 5-year retrospective longitudinal study.
Koutouzis T; Wennström JL
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2007 Oct; 18(5):585-90. PubMed ID: 17608740
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Mandibular implant-retained overdentures: a literature review.
Sadowsky SJ
J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Nov; 86(5):468-73. PubMed ID: 11725274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Retention forces of spherical attachments as a function of implant and matrix angulation in mandibular overdentures: an in vitro study.
Ortegón SM; Thompson GA; Agar JR; Taylor TD; Perdikis D
J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Apr; 101(4):231-8. PubMed ID: 19328276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effect of implant angulation on attachment retention in mandibular two-implant overdentures: a clinical study.
Jabbour Z; Fromentin O; Lassauzay C; Abi Nader S; Correa JA; Feine J; de Albuquerque Junior RF
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2014 Aug; 16(4):565-71. PubMed ID: 23305358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Two-implant mandibular overdentures: simple to fabricate and easy to wear.
Klemetti E; Chehade A; Takanashi Y; Feine JS
J Can Dent Assoc; 2003 Jan; 69(1):29-33. PubMed ID: 12556267
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The influence of interimplant distance and attachment type on the retention characteristics of mandibular overdentures on 2 implants: 6-month fatigue retention values.
Doukas D; Michelinakis G; Smith PW; Barclay CW
Int J Prosthodont; 2008; 21(2):152-4. PubMed ID: 18546771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Mandibular implant-retained overdentures with 2 different prosthetic designs: a retrospective pilot study on maintenance interventions.
Ceruti P; Menicucci G; Schierano G; Mussano F; Preti G
Int J Prosthodont; 2006; 19(6):557-9. PubMed ID: 17165293
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Mandibular overdentures supported by two or four endosseous implants: a 10-year clinical trial.
Meijer HJ; Raghoebar GM; Batenburg RH; Visser A; Vissink A
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Jul; 20(7):722-8. PubMed ID: 19489933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Mandibular implant-retained overdenture: a clinical trial of two anchorage systems.
Menicucci G; Lorenzetti M; Pera P; Preti G
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1998; 13(6):851-6. PubMed ID: 9857597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The influence of interimplant distance and attachment type on the retention characteristics of mandibular overdentures on 2 implants: initial retention values.
Michelinakis G; Barclay CW; Smith PW
Int J Prosthodont; 2006; 19(5):507-12. PubMed ID: 17323731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The in vitro effect of different implant angulations and cyclic dislodgement on the retentive properties of an overdenture attachment system.
Al-Ghafli SA; Michalakis KX; Hirayama H; Kang K
J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Sep; 102(3):140-7. PubMed ID: 19703620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
