494 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12066700)
1. A longitudinal study on mandibular implants supporting an overdenture: the influence of retention mechanism and anatomic-prosthetic variables on periimplant parameters.
Oetterli M; Kiener P; Mericske-Stern R
Int J Prosthodont; 2001; 14(6):536-42. PubMed ID: 12066700
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Mandibular overdentures supported by two or four endosseous implants: a 10-year clinical trial.
Meijer HJ; Raghoebar GM; Batenburg RH; Visser A; Vissink A
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Jul; 20(7):722-8. PubMed ID: 19489933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Clinical and radiological results of patients treated with two loading protocols for mandibular overdentures on Brånemark implants.
Turkyilmaz I
J Clin Periodontol; 2006 Mar; 33(3):233-8. PubMed ID: 16489951
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A 10-year randomized clinical trial on the influence of splinted and unsplinted oral implants retaining mandibular overdentures: peri-implant outcome.
Naert I; Alsaadi G; van Steenberghe D; Quirynen M
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2004; 19(5):695-702. PubMed ID: 15508985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Mandibular implant overdentures followed for over 10 years: patient compliance and prosthetic maintenance.
Rentsch-Kollar A; Huber S; Mericske-Stern R
Int J Prosthodont; 2010; 23(2):91-8. PubMed ID: 20305844
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Randomized, prospective, clinical evaluation of prosthodontic modalities for mandibular implant overdenture treatment.
Burns DR; Unger JW; Coffey JP; Waldrop TC; Elswick RK
J Prosthet Dent; 2011 Jul; 106(1):12-22. PubMed ID: 21723989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Within-subject comparison of two rigid bar designs connecting two interforaminal implants: patients' satisfaction and prosthetic results.
Mericske-Stern R; Probst D; Fahrländer F; Schellenberg M
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2009 Sep; 11(3):228-37. PubMed ID: 18783424
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Long-term results of mandibular implants supporting an overdenture: implant survival, failures, and crestal bone level changes.
Ueda T; Kremer U; Katsoulis J; Mericske-Stern R
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(2):365-72. PubMed ID: 21483890
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The influence of bar design (round versus milled bar) on prosthodontic maintenance of mandibular overdentures supported by 4 implants: a 5-year prospective study.
Krennmair G; Krainhöfner M; Piehslinger E
Int J Prosthodont; 2008; 21(6):514-20. PubMed ID: 19149069
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Implant-supported mandibular overdentures retained with a milled bar: a retrospective study.
Krennmair G; Krainhöfner M; Piehslinger E
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(6):987-94. PubMed ID: 18271381
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of prefabricated and custom-made bars used for implant-retained mandibular complete overdentures.
Abd El-Dayem MA; Assad AS; Eldin Sanad ME; Mahmoud Mogahed SA
Implant Dent; 2009 Dec; 18(6):501-11. PubMed ID: 20009604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of ball and telescopic crown attachments in implant-retained mandibular overdentures: a 5-year prospective study.
Krennmair G; Seemann R; Weinländer M; Piehslinger E
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(3):598-606. PubMed ID: 21691608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The symphyseal single-tooth implant for anchorage of a mandibular complete denture in geriatric patients: a clinical report.
Krennmair G; Ulm C
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2001; 16(1):98-104. PubMed ID: 11280368
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Removable implant-prosthodontic rehabilitation of the edentulous mandible: five-year results of different prosthetic anchorage concepts.
Weinländer M; Piehslinger E; Krennmair G
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010; 25(3):589-97. PubMed ID: 20556260
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Clinical and radiologic evaluation of 2-stage IMZ implants placed in a single-stage procedure: 2-year results of a prospective comparative study.
Heydenrijk K; Raghoebar GM; Meijer HJ; Stegenga B
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2003; 18(3):424-32. PubMed ID: 12814319
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Five-year treatment outcomes with three brands of implants supporting mandibular overdentures.
Akoglu B; Ucankale M; Ozkan Y; Kulak-Ozkan Y
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(1):188-94. PubMed ID: 21365055
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A follow-up study of maxillary implants supporting an overdenture: clinical and radiographic results.
Mericske-Stern R; Oetterli M; Kiener P; Mericske E
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2002; 17(5):678-86. PubMed ID: 12381068
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Five-year clinical results of immediately loaded dental implants using mandibular overdentures.
Alfadda SA; Attard NJ; David LA
Int J Prosthodont; 2009; 22(4):368-73. PubMed ID: 19639074
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. One-year prosthetic outcomes with implant overdentures: a randomized clinical trial.
Walton JN; MacEntee MI; Glick N
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2002; 17(3):391-8. PubMed ID: 12074455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Mandibular implant-retained overdenture: a clinical trial of two anchorage systems.
Menicucci G; Lorenzetti M; Pera P; Preti G
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1998; 13(6):851-6. PubMed ID: 9857597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
