These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12066711)

  • 1. Definitions in phylogenetic taxonomy: critique and rationale.
    Sereno PC
    Syst Biol; 1999 Jun; 48(2):329-51. PubMed ID: 12066711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The logical basis of phylogenetic taxonomy.
    Sereno PC
    Syst Biol; 2005 Aug; 54(4):595-619. PubMed ID: 16109704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A review of criticisms of phylogenetic nomenclature: is taxonomic freedom the fundamental issue?
    Bryant HN; Cantino PD
    Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc; 2002 Feb; 77(1):39-55. PubMed ID: 11911373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The application of species criteria in avian taxonomy and its implications for the debate over species concepts.
    Sangster G
    Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc; 2014 Feb; 89(1):199-214. PubMed ID: 23869749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Uncovering Higher-Taxon Diversification Dynamics from Clade Age and Species-Richness Data.
    Sánchez-Reyes LL; Morlon H; Magallón S
    Syst Biol; 2017 May; 66(3):367-378. PubMed ID: 28003532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Assessing clustering results with reference taxonomies.
    Valiente G
    Genome Inform; 2006; 17(2):131-40. PubMed ID: 17503386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. On the relevance of molecular tools for taxonomic revision in Malvales, Malvaceae s.l., and Dombeyoideae.
    Le Péchon T; Gigord LD
    Methods Mol Biol; 2014; 1115():337-63. PubMed ID: 24415483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Constraints in naming parts of the Tree of Life.
    Hillis DM
    Mol Phylogenet Evol; 2007 Feb; 42(2):331-8. PubMed ID: 16997582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Foundations of the new phylogenetics].
    Pavlinov IIa
    Zh Obshch Biol; 2004; 65(4):334-66. PubMed ID: 15490579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Development of definitions for taxonomy II.
    Kerr ME; Hoskins LM; Fitzpatrick JJ; Warren JJ; Avant KC; Carpenito LJ; Hurley ME; Jakob D; Lunney M; Mills WC
    Nurs Diagn; 1992; 3(2):65-71. PubMed ID: 1610618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The systematic component of phylogenetic error as a function of taxonomic sampling under parsimony.
    Debry RW
    Syst Biol; 2005 Jun; 54(3):432-40. PubMed ID: 16012109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Optimal selection of gene and ingroup taxon sampling for resolving phylogenetic relationships.
    Townsend JP; Lopez-Giraldez F
    Syst Biol; 2010 Jul; 59(4):446-57. PubMed ID: 20547780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Classification of apocynaceae s.l. according to a new approach combining Linnaean and phylogenetic taxonomy.
    Sennblad B; Bremer B
    Syst Biol; 2002 Jun; 51(3):389-409. PubMed ID: 12079641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Integration of morphological data sets for phylogenetic analysis of Amniota: the importance of integumentary characters and increased taxonomic sampling.
    Hill RV
    Syst Biol; 2005 Aug; 54(4):530-47. PubMed ID: 16085573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. New proposals for naming lower-ranked taxa within the frame of the International Code of Zoological Nomenclature.
    Dubois A
    C R Biol; 2006 Oct; 329(10):823-40. PubMed ID: 17027643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Phylogeny of extant and fossil Juglandaceae inferred from the integration of molecular and morphological data sets.
    Manos PS; Soltis PS; Soltis DE; Manchester SR; Oh SH; Bell CD; Dilcher DL; Stone DE
    Syst Biol; 2007 Jun; 56(3):412-30. PubMed ID: 17558964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The phylogenetic relationships of the shags and cormorants: can sequence data resolve a disagreement between behavior and morphology?
    Kennedy M; Gray RD; Spencer HG
    Mol Phylogenet Evol; 2000 Dec; 17(3):345-59. PubMed ID: 11133189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Why Do Phylogenomic Data Sets Yield Conflicting Trees? Data Type Influences the Avian Tree of Life more than Taxon Sampling.
    Reddy S; Kimball RT; Pandey A; Hosner PA; Braun MJ; Hackett SJ; Han KL; Harshman J; Huddleston CJ; Kingston S; Marks BD; Miglia KJ; Moore WS; Sheldon FH; Witt CC; Yuri T; Braun EL
    Syst Biol; 2017 Sep; 66(5):857-879. PubMed ID: 28369655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Sensitivity of phylogeny estimation to taxonomic sampling.
    Poe S
    Syst Biol; 1998 Mar; 47(1):18-31. PubMed ID: 12064237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Age rank/clade rank metrics--sampling, taxonomy, and the meaning of "stratigraphic consistency".
    Wagner PJ; Sidor CA
    Syst Biol; 2000 Sep; 49(3):463-79. PubMed ID: 12116422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.