368 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12066729)
1. Randomized crossover comparison of the proseal with the classic laryngeal mask airway in unparalysed anaesthetized patients.
Cook TM; Nolan JP; Verghese C; Strube PJ; Lees M; Millar JM; Baskett PJ
Br J Anaesth; 2002 Apr; 88(4):527-33. PubMed ID: 12066729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Stability of the LMA-ProSeal and standard laryngeal mask airway in different head and neck positions: a randomized crossover study.
Brimacombe J; Keller C
Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2003 Jan; 20(1):65-9. PubMed ID: 12553391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Randomized crossover comparison of the ProSeal laryngeal mask airway with the Laryngeal Tube during anaesthesia with controlled ventilation.
Cook TM; McKinstry C; Hardy R; Twigg S
Br J Anaesth; 2003 Nov; 91(5):678-83. PubMed ID: 14570790
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The ProSeal laryngeal mask airway: A randomized, crossover study with the standard laryngeal mask airway in paralyzed, anesthetized patients.
Brimacombe J; Keller C
Anesthesiology; 2000 Jul; 93(1):104-9. PubMed ID: 10861152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The laryngeal mask airway Supreme--a single use laryngeal mask airway with an oesophageal vent. A randomised, cross-over study with the laryngeal mask airway ProSeal in paralysed, anaesthetised patients.
Eschertzhuber S; Brimacombe J; Hohlrieder M; Keller C
Anaesthesia; 2009 Jan; 64(1):79-83. PubMed ID: 19087011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The size 1(1/2) ProSeal laryngeal mask airway in infants: a randomized, crossover investigation with the Classic laryngeal mask airway.
Goldmann K; Roettger C; Wulf H
Anesth Analg; 2006 Feb; 102(2):405-10. PubMed ID: 16428533
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The effects of head flexion on airway seal, quality of ventilation and orogastric tube placement using the ProSeal laryngeal mask airway.
Xue FS; Mao P; Liu HP; Yang QY; Li CW; He N; Xu YC; Liao X
Anaesthesia; 2008 Sep; 63(9):979-85. PubMed ID: 18699873
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Laryngeal mask airway ProSeal provides higher oropharyngeal leak pressure than i-gel in adult patients under general anesthesia: a meta-analysis.
Maitra S; Baidya DK; Arora MK; Bhattacharjee S; Khanna P
J Clin Anesth; 2016 Sep; 33():298-305. PubMed ID: 27555181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Use of the size 3 ProSeal laryngeal mask airway in children. Results of a randomized crossover investigation with the Classic laryngeal mask airway].
Goldmann K; Roettger C; Wulf H
Anaesthesist; 2006 Feb; 55(2):148-53. PubMed ID: 16270215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Pharyngeal mucosal pressures with the laryngeal tube airway versus ProSeal laryngeal mask airway.
Keller C; Brimacombe J; Kleinsasser A; Loeckinger A
Anasthesiol Intensivmed Notfallmed Schmerzther; 2003 Jun; 38(6):393-6. PubMed ID: 12759874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The proseal laryngeal mask: results of a descriptive trial with experience of 300 cases.
Evans NR; Gardner SV; James MF; King JA; Roux P; Bennett P; Nattrass R; Llewellyn R; Visu D
Br J Anaesth; 2002 Apr; 88(4):534-9. PubMed ID: 12066730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. ProSeal versus Classic laryngeal mask airway (LMA) for positive pressure ventilation in adults undergoing elective surgery.
Qamarul Hoda M; Samad K; Ullah H
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2017 Jul; 7(7):CD009026. PubMed ID: 28727896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A comparison of seal in seven supraglottic airway devices using a cadaver model of elevated esophageal pressure.
Bercker S; Schmidbauer W; Volk T; Bogusch G; Bubser HP; Hensel M; Kerner T
Anesth Analg; 2008 Feb; 106(2):445-8, table of contents. PubMed ID: 18227299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Efficacy of the ProSeal laryngeal mask airway during manual in-line stabilisation of the neck.
Asai T; Murao K; Shingu K
Anaesthesia; 2002 Sep; 57(9):918-20. PubMed ID: 12190759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [First clinical impressions of ProSeal laryngeal mask].
Murashima K; Yoshino H; Matsumoto T; Fukutome T
Masui; 2002 Jun; 51(6):677-82. PubMed ID: 12134664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. ProSeal versus the Classic laryngeal mask airway for positive pressure ventilation during laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
Lu PP; Brimacombe J; Yang C; Shyr M
Br J Anaesth; 2002 Jun; 88(6):824-7. PubMed ID: 12173201
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparisons of clinical performance of Guardian laryngeal mask with laryngeal mask airway ProSeal.
Pajiyar AK; Wen Z; Wang H; Ma L; Miao L; Wang G
BMC Anesthesiol; 2015 May; 15():69. PubMed ID: 25929558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A comparison of the Supreme laryngeal mask airway with the Proseal laryngeal mask airway in anesthetized paralyzed adult patients: a randomized crossover study.
Tham HM; Tan SM; Woon KL; Zhao YD
Can J Anaesth; 2010 Jul; 57(7):672-8. PubMed ID: 20411444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [An auto control comparison of the use of ProSeal laryngeal mask airway and standard laryngeal mask airway for positive pressure ventilation].
Li CW; Xue FS; Mao P; Xu YC; Liu Y; Zhang GH; Liu KP; Sun HT
Zhongguo Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue; 2007 Feb; 19(2):81-5. PubMed ID: 17326908
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A comparison of the oropharyngeal leak pressure between the reusable Classic laryngeal mask airway and the single-use Soft Seal laryngeal mask airway.
Hanning SJ; McCulloch TJ; Orr B; Anderson SP
Anaesth Intensive Care; 2006 Apr; 34(2):237-9. PubMed ID: 16617647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
