244 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12067128)
1. Gutta-percha retreatment: effectiveness of nickel-titanium rotary instruments versus stainless steel hand files.
Barrieshi-Nusair KM
J Endod; 2002 Jun; 28(6):454-6. PubMed ID: 12067128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Efficacy, cleaning ability and safety of different rotary NiTi instruments in root canal retreatment.
Hülsmann M; Bluhm V
Int Endod J; 2004 Jul; 37(7):468-76. PubMed ID: 15189436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Efficacy of ProTaper Universal rotary retreatment system for gutta-percha removal from root canals.
Gu LS; Ling JQ; Wei X; Huang XY
Int Endod J; 2008 Apr; 41(4):288-95. PubMed ID: 18081804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. In vitro evaluation of the effectiveness of ProTaper universal rotary retreatment system for gutta-percha removal with or without a solvent.
Takahashi CM; Cunha RS; de Martin AS; Fontana CE; Silveira CF; da Silveira Bueno CE
J Endod; 2009 Nov; 35(11):1580-3. PubMed ID: 19840652
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Efficacy of two rotary NiTi instruments in the removal of Gutta-Percha during root canal retreatment.
Saad AY; Al-Hadlaq SM; Al-Katheeri NH
J Endod; 2007 Jan; 33(1):38-41. PubMed ID: 17185127
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Retreatment efficacy of hand versus automated instrumentation in oval-shaped root canals: an ex vivo study.
Zmener O; Pameijer CH; Banegas G
Int Endod J; 2006 Jul; 39(7):521-6. PubMed ID: 16776756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effectiveness of two nickel-titanium rotary instruments and a hand file for removing gutta-percha in severely curved root canals during retreatment: an ex vivo study.
Gergi R; Sabbagh C
Int Endod J; 2007 Jul; 40(7):532-7. PubMed ID: 17511787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effectiveness of a hand file and three nickel-titanium rotary instruments for removing gutta-percha in curved root canals during retreatment.
Schirrmeister JF; Wrbas KT; Schneider FH; Altenburger MJ; Hellwig E
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2006 Apr; 101(4):542-7. PubMed ID: 16545721
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Efficacy of two Ni-Ti systems and hand files for removing gutta-percha from root canals.
Mollo A; Botti G; Prinicipi Goldoni N; Randellini E; Paragliola R; Chazine M; Ounsi HF; Grandini S
Int Endod J; 2012 Jan; 45(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 21848894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The efficacy of R-Endo rotary NiTi and stainless-steel hand instruments to remove gutta-percha and Resilon.
Fenoul G; Meless GD; Pérez F
Int Endod J; 2010 Feb; 43(2):135-41. PubMed ID: 20078702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effectiveness of different techniques for removing gutta-percha during retreatment.
Masiero AV; Barletta FB
Int Endod J; 2005 Jan; 38(1):2-7. PubMed ID: 15606816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The effectiveness of manual and mechanical instrumentation for the retreatment of three different root canal filling materials.
Somma F; Cammarota G; Plotino G; Grande NM; Pameijer CH
J Endod; 2008 Apr; 34(4):466-9. PubMed ID: 18358899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Efficacy of different rotary instruments for gutta-percha removal in root canal retreatment.
Schirrmeister JF; Wrbas KT; Meyer KM; Altenburger MJ; Hellwig E
J Endod; 2006 May; 32(5):469-72. PubMed ID: 16631851
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Efficacy of D-RaCe and ProTaper Universal Retreatment NiTi instruments and hand files in removing gutta-percha from curved root canals - a micro-computed tomography study.
Rödig T; Hausdörfer T; Konietschke F; Dullin C; Hahn W; Hülsmann M
Int Endod J; 2012 Jun; 45(6):580-9. PubMed ID: 22264204
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Ex vivo study of the efficacy of H-files and rotary Ni-Ti instruments to remove gutta-percha and four types of sealer.
Kosti E; Lambrianidis T; Economides N; Neofitou C
Int Endod J; 2006 Jan; 39(1):48-54. PubMed ID: 16409328
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison between gutta-percha and resilon removal using two different techniques in endodontic retreatment.
de Oliveira DP; Barbizam JV; Trope M; Teixeira FB
J Endod; 2006 Apr; 32(4):362-4. PubMed ID: 16554213
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of spreader penetration during lateral compaction of .04 and .02 tapered gutta-percha.
Wilson BL; Baumgartner JC
J Endod; 2003 Dec; 29(12):828-31. PubMed ID: 14686816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effectiveness of the ProFile.04 Taper Series 29 files in removal of gutta-percha root fillings during curved root canal retreatment.
Valois CR; Navarro M; Ramos AA; de Castro AJ; Gahyva SM
Braz Dent J; 2001; 12(2):95-9. PubMed ID: 11450685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Efficacy of 2 reciprocating systems compared with a rotary retreatment system for gutta-percha removal.
Rios Mde A; Villela AM; Cunha RS; Velasco RC; De Martin AS; Kato AS; Bueno CE
J Endod; 2014 Apr; 40(4):543-6. PubMed ID: 24666908
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A comparison of the efficacy of conventional and new retreatment instruments to remove gutta-percha in curved root canals: an ex vivo study.
Unal GC; Kaya BU; Taç AG; Keçeci AD
Int Endod J; 2009 Apr; 42(4):344-50. PubMed ID: 19220515
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
