BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

163 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12067513)

  • 21. A Biomechanical Waist Comfort Model for Manual Material Lifting.
    Zhang Y; Ke J; Wu X; Luo X
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2020 Aug; 17(16):. PubMed ID: 32824371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Effects of load mass and position on the dynamic loading of the knees, shoulders and lumbar spine during lifting: a musculoskeletal modelling approach.
    Skals S; Bláfoss R; de Zee M; Andersen LL; Andersen MS
    Appl Ergon; 2021 Oct; 96():103491. PubMed ID: 34126573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Revised NIOSH equation for manual lifting: a method for job evaluation.
    Garg A
    AAOHN J; 1995 Apr; 43(4):211-6; quiz 217-8. PubMed ID: 7772206
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. A biomechanical analysis of methods used for transferring totally dependent patients.
    Ulin SS; Chaffin DB; Patellos CL; Blitz SG; Emerick CA; Lundy F; Misher L
    SCI Nurs; 1997 Mar; 14(1):19-27. PubMed ID: 9165952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. [Progress in research on evaluation method of lifting equation of National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health of USA].
    Cao L; He LH; Wang S
    Zhonghua Lao Dong Wei Sheng Zhi Ye Bing Za Zhi; 2010 Dec; 28(12):936-9. PubMed ID: 21241613
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The effectiveness of commonly used lifting assessment methods to identify industrial jobs associated with elevated risk of low-back disorders.
    Marras WS; Fine LJ; Ferguson SA; Waters TR
    Ergonomics; 1999 Jan; 42(1):229-45. PubMed ID: 9973881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. An evaluation of the NIOSH guidelines for manual lifting, with special reference to horizontal distance.
    Garg A
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1989 Mar; 50(3):157-64. PubMed ID: 2718909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. A comparative study of methods for establishing load handling capabilities.
    Nicholson AS
    Ergonomics; 1989 Sep; 32(9):1125-44. PubMed ID: 2680481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Lifter, a computerized lifting analysis technique.
    Gilad I; Boughanim D
    Int J Occup Saf Ergon; 2002; 8(4):525-37. PubMed ID: 12427355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The relationship between low back discomfort ratings and the NIOSH lifting index.
    Wang MJ; Garg A; Chang YC; Shih YC; Yeh WY; Lee CL
    Hum Factors; 1998 Sep; 40(3):509-15. PubMed ID: 9849108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Ergonomics case study: revised NIOSH lifting equation instruction issues for students.
    Cole SS; McGlothlin J
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2009 Nov; 6(11):D73-81. PubMed ID: 19750405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Variable Lifting Index (VLI): A New Method for Evaluating Variable Lifting Tasks.
    Waters T; Occhipinti E; Colombini D; Alvarez-Casado E; Fox R
    Hum Factors; 2016 Aug; 58(5):695-711. PubMed ID: 26646300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Accuracy of measurements for the revised NIOSH lifting equation. National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health.
    Waters TR; Baron SL; Kemmlert K
    Appl Ergon; 1998 Dec; 29(6):433-8. PubMed ID: 9796788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Physiological and psychophysical comparison between a lifting task with identical weight but different coupling factors.
    Adams KJ; DeBeliso M; Sevene-Adams PG; Berning JM; Miller T; Tollerud DJ
    J Strength Cond Res; 2010 Feb; 24(2):307-12. PubMed ID: 20072069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. An evaluation of methods assessing the physical demands of manual lifting in scaffolding.
    van der Beek AJ; Erik Mathiassen S; Windhorst J; Burdorf A
    Appl Ergon; 2005 Mar; 36(2):213-22. PubMed ID: 15694076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Evaluation of ergonomic physical risk factors in a truck manufacturing plant: case study in SCANIA Production Angers.
    Zare M; Malinge-Oudenot A; Höglund R; Biau S; Roquelaure Y
    Ind Health; 2016; 54(2):163-76. PubMed ID: 26423331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Predictive equations for lumbar spine loads in load-dependent asymmetric one- and two-handed lifting activities.
    Arjmand N; Plamondon A; Shirazi-Adl A; Parnianpour M; Larivière C
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2012 Jul; 27(6):537-44. PubMed ID: 22265249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Effect of background music on maximum acceptable weight of manual lifting tasks.
    Yu R
    Int J Occup Saf Ergon; 2014; 20(3):437-45. PubMed ID: 25189748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Evaluating ergonomic stresses in North Carolina commercial crab pot and gill net fishermen.
    Kucera KL; Mirka GA; Loomis D; Marshall SW; Lipscomb HJ; Daniels J
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2008 Mar; 5(3):182-96. PubMed ID: 18213532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The Cumulative Lifting Index (CULI) for the Revised NIOSH Lifting Equation: Quantifying Risk for Workers With Job Rotation.
    Garg A; Kapellusch JM
    Hum Factors; 2016 Aug; 58(5):683-94. PubMed ID: 26896406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.