These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12068392)

  • 1. Fixation for the millennium: the hip.
    Rosenberg AG
    J Arthroplasty; 2002 Jun; 17(4 Suppl 1):3-5. PubMed ID: 12068392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Acetabular components in total hip arthroplasty: is there evidence that cementless fixation is better?
    Toossi N; Adeli B; Timperley AJ; Haddad FS; Maltenfort M; Parvizi J
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2013 Jan; 95(2):168-74. PubMed ID: 23324965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A comparison of cemented and cementless titanium femoral components used for primary total hip arthroplasty: a radiographic and survivorship study.
    Emerson RH; Head WC; Emerson CB; Rosenfeldt W; Higgins LL
    J Arthroplasty; 2002 Aug; 17(5):584-91. PubMed ID: 12168174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Primary aseptic revision of the femoral component of a cemented total hip arthroplasty using a cemented technique without bone graft.
    Bardou-Jacquet J; Souillac V; Mouton A; Chauveaux D
    Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2009 Jun; 95(4):243-8. PubMed ID: 19523892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Total hip arthroplasty with a cemented, polished, collared femoral stem and a cementless acetabular component. A follow-up study at a minimum of ten years.
    Firestone DE; Callaghan JJ; Liu SS; Goetz DD; Sullivan PM; Vittetoe DA; Johnston RC
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2007 Jan; 89(1):126-32. PubMed ID: 17200319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Do Rerevision Rates Differ After First-time Revision of Primary THA With a Cemented and Cementless Femoral Component?
    Gromov K; Pedersen AB; Overgaard S; Gebuhr P; Malchau H; Troelsen A
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2015 Nov; 473(11):3391-8. PubMed ID: 25762017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Revision of a cemented acetabular component to a cementless acetabular component. A ten to fourteen-year follow-up study.
    Templeton JE; Callaghan JJ; Goetz DD; Sullivan PM; Johnston RC
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2001 Nov; 83(11):1706-11. PubMed ID: 11701795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Twenty-Five- to Twenty-Seven-Year Results of a Cemented vs a Cementless Stem in the Same Patients Younger Than 50 Years of Age.
    Kim YH; Park JW; Kim JS; Kim IW
    J Arthroplasty; 2016 Mar; 31(3):662-7. PubMed ID: 26601637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Tapered stems one-third proximally coated have higher complication rates than cylindrical two-third coated stems in patients with high hip dislocation undergoing total hip arthroplasty with step-cut shortening osteotomy.
    Ozden VE; Dikmen G; Beksac B; Tozun IR
    Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2017 Jun; 103(4):569-577. PubMed ID: 28300706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cemented femoral fixation: the North Atlantic divide.
    Murray DW
    Bone Joint J; 2013 Nov; 95-B(11 Suppl A):51-2. PubMed ID: 24187352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cementless acetabular reconstruction in revision total hip arthroplasty.
    Della Valle CJ; Berger RA; Rosenberg AG; Galante JO
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2004 Mar; (420):96-100. PubMed ID: 15057083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Cementless total hip arthroplasty: a review].
    Diehl P; Haenle M; Bergschmidt P; Gollwitzer H; Schauwecker J; Bader R; Mittelmeier W
    Biomed Tech (Berl); 2010 Oct; 55(5):251-64. PubMed ID: 20958235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Revision of a failed cemented total hip prosthesis with insertion of an acetabular component without cement and a femoral component with cement. A five to eight-year follow-up study.
    Weber KL; Callaghan JJ; Goetz DD; Johnston RC
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1996 Jul; 78(7):982-94. PubMed ID: 8698734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Minimum 10-year results of a tapered cementless hip replacement.
    Sakalkale DP; Eng K; Hozack WJ; Rothman RH
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1999 May; (362):138-44. PubMed ID: 10335292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Orthopaedic crossfire--Stem modularity is unnecessary in revision total hip arthroplasty: in the affirmative.
    Barrack RL
    J Arthroplasty; 2003 Apr; 18(3 Suppl 1):98-100. PubMed ID: 12730940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Second-generation cementless total hip arthroplasty. Eight to eleven-year results.
    Archibeck MJ; Berger RA; Jacobs JJ; Quigley LR; Gitelis S; Rosenberg AG; Galante JO
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2001 Nov; 83(11):1666-73. PubMed ID: 11701789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Isolated acetabular revision with femoral stem retention after bipolar hip arthroplasty.
    Kaku N; Tabata T; Tagomori H; Tsumura H
    Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2017 Mar; 137(3):425-430. PubMed ID: 28150224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Cementless acetabular reconstruction after acetabular fracture.
    Bellabarba C; Berger RA; Bentley CD; Quigley LR; Jacobs JJ; Rosenberg AG; Sheinkop MB; Galante JO
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2001 Jun; 83(6):868-76. PubMed ID: 11407795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Cemented total hip arthroplasty: still relevant in the new millennium?
    Iorio R; Kobayashi S
    J South Orthop Assoc; 2003; 12(2):79-82. PubMed ID: 12882245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Fate of cementless acetabular components retained during revision total hip arthroplasty.
    Beaulé PE; Le Duff MJ; Dorey FJ; Amstutz HC
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2003 Dec; 85(12):2288-93. PubMed ID: 14668496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.