These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

350 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12069004)

  • 21. Proficiency and Linguistic Complexity Influence Speech Motor Control and Performance in Spanish Language Learners.
    Nip IS; Blumenfeld HK
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2015 Jun; 58(3):653-68. PubMed ID: 25808051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Confusing similar words: ERP correlates of lexical-semantic processing in first language attrition and late second language acquisition.
    Kasparian K; Steinhauer K
    Neuropsychologia; 2016 Dec; 93(Pt A):200-217. PubMed ID: 27751710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Early Speech Segmentation in French-learning Infants: Monosyllabic Words versus Embedded Syllables.
    Nishibayashi LL; Goyet L; Nazzi T
    Lang Speech; 2015 Sep; 58(Pt 3):334-50. PubMed ID: 26529900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Why pitch sensitivity matters: event-related potential evidence of metric and syntactic violation detection among spanish late learners of german.
    Schmidt-Kassow M; Roncaglia-Denissen MP; Kotz SA
    Front Psychol; 2011; 2():131. PubMed ID: 21734898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Sensitivity to word endings as probabilistic orthographic cues to lexical stress among English as second language learners.
    Ren J; Wang M
    Mem Cognit; 2023 Nov; 51(8):1881-1897. PubMed ID: 37219718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Reiterant speech as a test of non-native speakers' mastery of the timing of French.
    Levitt AG
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1991 Dec; 90(6):3008-18. PubMed ID: 1787241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Gender agreement violations modulate beta oscillatory dynamics during sentence comprehension: A comparison of second language learners and native speakers.
    Lewis AG; Lemhӧfer K; Schoffelen JM; Schriefers H
    Neuropsychologia; 2016 Aug; 89():254-272. PubMed ID: 27350390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Influences of vowel and tone variation on emergent word knowledge: a cross-linguistic investigation.
    Singh L; Hui TJ; Chan C; Golinkoff RM
    Dev Sci; 2014 Jan; 17(1):94-109. PubMed ID: 24118787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Diminutives in child-directed speech supplement metric with distributional word segmentation cues.
    Kempe V; Brooks PJ; Gillis S
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2005 Feb; 12(1):145-51. PubMed ID: 15945207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Categorical perception of lexical tones by English learners of Mandarin Chinese.
    Shen G; Froud K
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 Dec; 140(6):4396. PubMed ID: 28040029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. A cross-language study of perception of lexical stress in English.
    Yu VY; Andruski JE
    J Psycholinguist Res; 2010 Aug; 39(4):323-44. PubMed ID: 20033291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Word learning in adults with second-language experience: effects of phonological and referent familiarity.
    Kaushanskaya M; Yoo J; Van Hecke S
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2013 Apr; 56(2):667-78. PubMed ID: 22992709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Differential use of temporal cues to the /s/-/z/ contrast by native and non-native speakers of English.
    Flege JE; Hillenbrand J
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1986 Feb; 79(2):508-17. PubMed ID: 3950204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The effects of late acquisition of L2 and the consequences of immigration on L1 for semantic and morpho-syntactic language aspects.
    Scherag A; Demuth L; Rösler F; Neville HJ; Röder B
    Cognition; 2004 Oct; 93(3):B97-108. PubMed ID: 15178380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Raspberry, not a car: context predictability and a phonological advantage in early and late learners' processing of speech in noise.
    Gor K
    Front Psychol; 2014; 5():1449. PubMed ID: 25566130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Cross-linguistic differences in the use of durational cues for the segmentation of a novel language.
    Ordin M; Polyanskaya L; Laka I; Nespor M
    Mem Cognit; 2017 Jul; 45(5):863-876. PubMed ID: 28290103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Exploring the "anchor word" effect in infants: Segmentation and categorisation of speech with and without high frequency words.
    Frost RLA; Dunn K; Christiansen MH; Gómez RL; Monaghan P
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(12):e0243436. PubMed ID: 33332419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Word segmentation with universal prosodic cues.
    Endress AD; Hauser MD
    Cogn Psychol; 2010 Sep; 61(2):177-99. PubMed ID: 20573342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Oral cavity awareness in nonnative speakers acquiring English.
    Lohman P
    Percept Mot Skills; 2008 Jun; 106(3):821-9. PubMed ID: 18712203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The influence of language exposure on lexical and syntactic language processing.
    Love T; Maas E; Swinney D
    Exp Psychol; 2003; 50(3):204-16. PubMed ID: 12874989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.