382 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12069010)
1. Lexical and talker effects on word recognition among native and non-native listeners with normal and impaired hearing.
Takayanagi S; Dirks DD; Moshfegh A
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2002 Jun; 45(3):585-97. PubMed ID: 12069010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Speech perception in children with cochlear implants: effects of lexical difficulty, talker variability, and word length.
Kirk KI; Hay-McCutcheon M; Sehgal ST; Miyamoto RT
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl; 2000 Dec; 185():79-81. PubMed ID: 11141016
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Examination of the neighborhood activation theory in normal and hearing-impaired listeners.
Dirks DD; Takayanagi S; Moshfegh A; Noffsinger PD; Fausti SA
Ear Hear; 2001 Feb; 22(1):1-13. PubMed ID: 11271971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Recognition of spoken words by native and non-native listeners: talker-, listener-, and item-related factors.
Bradlow AR; Pisoni DB
J Acoust Soc Am; 1999 Oct; 106(4 Pt 1):2074-85. PubMed ID: 10530030
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effect of training on word-recognition performance in noise for young normal-hearing and older hearing-impaired listeners.
Burk MH; Humes LE; Amos NE; Strauser LE
Ear Hear; 2006 Jun; 27(3):263-78. PubMed ID: 16672795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effects of lexical factors on word recognition among normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.
Dirks DD; Takayana S; Moshfegh A
J Am Acad Audiol; 2001 May; 12(5):233-44. PubMed ID: 11392435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Non-native listeners' recognition of high-variability speech using PRESTO.
Tamati TN; Pisoni DB
J Am Acad Audiol; 2014 Oct; 25(9):869-92. PubMed ID: 25405842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effects of stimulus variability on speech perception in listeners with hearing impairment.
Kirk KI; Pisoni DB; Miyamoto RC
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 1997 Dec; 40(6):1395-405. PubMed ID: 9430759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Talker-familiarity benefit in non-native recognition memory and word identification: The role of listening conditions and proficiency.
Drozdova P; van Hout R; Scharenborg O
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2019 Jul; 81(5):1675-1697. PubMed ID: 30834484
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Hierarchical contributions of linguistic knowledge to talker identification: Phonological versus lexical familiarity.
McLaughlin DE; Carter YD; Cheng CC; Perrachione TK
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2019 May; 81(4):1088-1107. PubMed ID: 31218598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Some Neurocognitive Correlates of Noise-Vocoded Speech Perception in Children With Normal Hearing: A Replication and Extension of ).
Roman AS; Pisoni DB; Kronenberger WG; Faulkner KF
Ear Hear; 2017; 38(3):344-356. PubMed ID: 28045787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Intelligibility of emotional speech in younger and older adults.
Dupuis K; Pichora-Fuller MK
Ear Hear; 2014; 35(6):695-707. PubMed ID: 25127327
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Some considerations in evaluating spoken word recognition by normal-hearing, noise-masked normal-hearing, and cochlear implant listeners. I: The effects of response format.
Sommers MS; Kirk KI; Pisoni DB
Ear Hear; 1997 Apr; 18(2):89-99. PubMed ID: 9099558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Impact of talker variability on word recognition in non-native listeners.
van Dommelen WA; Hazan V
J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Sep; 132(3):1690-9. PubMed ID: 22978897
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Word recognition for temporally and spectrally distorted materials: the effects of age and hearing loss.
Smith SL; Pichora-Fuller MK; Wilson RH; Macdonald EN
Ear Hear; 2012; 33(3):349-66. PubMed ID: 22343546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Some factors underlying individual differences in speech recognition on PRESTO: a first report.
Tamati TN; Gilbert JL; Pisoni DB
J Am Acad Audiol; 2013; 24(7):616-34. PubMed ID: 24047949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Proportional frequency compression of speech for listeners with sensorineural hearing loss.
Turner CW; Hurtig RR
J Acoust Soc Am; 1999 Aug; 106(2):877-86. PubMed ID: 10462793
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Standard-Chinese Lexical Neighborhood Test in normal-hearing young children.
Liu C; Liu S; Zhang N; Yang Y; Kong Y; Zhang L
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2011 Jun; 75(6):774-81. PubMed ID: 21458862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effects of cross-language voice training on speech perception: whose familiar voices are more intelligible?
Levi SV; Winters SJ; Pisoni DB
J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Dec; 130(6):4053-62. PubMed ID: 22225059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Perception of temporally processed speech by listeners with hearing impairment.
Calandruccio L; Doherty KA; Carney LH; Kikkeri HN
Ear Hear; 2007 Aug; 28(4):512-23. PubMed ID: 17609613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
