159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12069478)
1. Consultant assessment and appraisal.
Williams F
Clin Radiol; 2002 Jun; 57(6):537-8. PubMed ID: 12069478
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Consultant assessment and appraisal.
McCoubrie P; Troughton A; Beale A
Clin Radiol; 2002 Sep; 57(9):864. PubMed ID: 12384121
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Consultant assessment and appraisal: an outline in practice.
Meagher T; Smith R; Bodley R; Booth A; Chandra A; Melvin C; Savage P; Record C
Clin Radiol; 2002 Jan; 57(1):37-40. PubMed ID: 11798201
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Assessing staff's on-going competencies.
Shaneberger K
OR Manager; 2008 Aug; 24(8):22-3, 25. PubMed ID: 18754226
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. How to assess your specialist registrar.
Davies H; Howells R
Arch Dis Child; 2004 Dec; 89(12):1089-93. PubMed ID: 15557038
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Assessing the performance of a consultant anaesthetist by control chart methodology.
Runcie CJ
Anaesthesia; 2009 Mar; 64(3):293-6. PubMed ID: 19302643
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Consultant appraisal.
Winearls CG
QJM; 2001 May; 94(5):235-6. PubMed ID: 11353096
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Workplace-based assessment.
Swanwick T; Chana N
Br J Hosp Med (Lond); 2009 May; 70(5):290-3. PubMed ID: 19451876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. How to conduct an appraisal of a senior house officer.
Clancy MJ
J Accid Emerg Med; 1999 Sep; 16(5):371-3. PubMed ID: 10505925
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Teaching on the run tips 6: determining competence.
Lake FR; Hamdorf JM
Med J Aust; 2004 Nov; 181(9):502-3. PubMed ID: 15516197
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. [A sociometric method for expert point-scale evaluations in determining the work efficiency of medical personnel].
Bernovich OV; Rozenbaum MD; Rozenbaum VM
Vrach Delo; 1991 Feb; (2):106-11. PubMed ID: 2058107
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Performance-based assessment of radiology practitioners: promoting improvement in accordance with the 2007 joint commission standards.
Donnelly LF
J Am Coll Radiol; 2007 Oct; 4(10):699-703. PubMed ID: 17903754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Consultant appraisal. Getting won over.
Moore A
Health Serv J; 2001 Aug; 111(5766):22-5. PubMed ID: 11507871
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. The purpose of RITA. Record of in-training assessment.
Leaver P
J R Soc Med; 2003 Feb; 96(2):103. PubMed ID: 12562989
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. An analytical approach to improving physician performance.
Sutter R; Waterman B; Udwin M
Physician Exec; 2013; 39(3):26-36. PubMed ID: 23802385
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Consultant appraisals. Appraise where due.
Ledgard A; Thomas B; McClelland S; Robbé I
Health Serv J; 2002 Nov; 112(5832):28-9. PubMed ID: 12474633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Re-evaluating revalidation and appraisal.
Pringle M
Br J Gen Pract; 2003 Jun; 53(491):437-8. PubMed ID: 12939886
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Managing the appraisal.
Parkin D; McKimm J
Br J Hosp Med (Lond); 2009 Sep; 70(9):528-31. PubMed ID: 19749644
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A crisis in confidence: a combined challenge and opportunity for medical imaging providers.
Reiner BI
J Am Coll Radiol; 2014 Feb; 11(2):107-8. PubMed ID: 24332819
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Possible reasons for study results.
Prabhu SP; Goddard PR
Clin Radiol; 2004 Oct; 59(10):961; author reply 961-2. PubMed ID: 15451360
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]