230 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12070639)
1. Occupational relevance of positive standard patch-test results in employed persons with an initial report of an occupational skin disease.
Dickel H; Kuss O; Schmidt A; Diepgen TL
Int Arch Occup Environ Health; 2002 Aug; 75(6):423-34. PubMed ID: 12070639
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Concomitant positive reactions to allergens in a patch testing standard series from 1988-1997.
Albert MR; Chang Y; González E
Am J Contact Dermat; 1999 Dec; 10(4):219-23. PubMed ID: 10594298
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Study on Chinese common allergens of contact dermatitis.
Fan WX; Zhao B
Derm Beruf Umwelt; 1990; 38(5):158-61. PubMed ID: 2286161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Epidemiology of contact dermatitis: prevalence of sensitization to different allergens and associated factors].
Bordel-Gómez MT; Miranda-Romero A; Castrodeza-Sanz J
Actas Dermosifiliogr; 2010; 101(1):59-75. PubMed ID: 20109394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Patch testing reactions to a standard series in 608 patients tested from 1990 to 1997 at Massachusetts General Hospital.
Albert MR; González S; González E
Am J Contact Dermat; 1998 Dec; 9(4):207-11. PubMed ID: 9810020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Prevalence and relevance of contact dermatitis allergens: a meta-analysis of 15 years of published T.R.U.E. test data.
Krob HA; Fleischer AB; D'Agostino R; Haverstock CL; Feldman S
J Am Acad Dermatol; 2004 Sep; 51(3):349-53. PubMed ID: 15337975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Epicutaneous testing with a standard series. Results in 12,026 patients].
Enders F; Przybilla B; Ring J; Burg G; Braun-Falco O
Hautarzt; 1988 Dec; 39(12):779-86. PubMed ID: 2976753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Epidemiological survey of contact dermatitis in Italy (1984-1993) by GIRDCA (Gruppo Italiano Ricerca Dermatiti da Contatto e Ambientali).
Sertoli A; Francalanci S; Acciai MC; Gola M
Am J Contact Dermat; 1999 Mar; 10(1):18-30. PubMed ID: 10072334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. North American Contact Dermatitis Group patch test results for 2007-2008.
Fransway AF; Zug KA; Belsito DV; Deleo VA; Fowler JF; Maibach HI; Marks JG; Mathias CG; Pratt MD; Rietschel RL; Sasseville D; Storrs FJ; Taylor JS; Warshaw EM; Dekoven J; Zirwas M
Dermatitis; 2013; 24(1):10-21. PubMed ID: 23340394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. European Standard Series patch test results from a contact dermatitis clinic in Israel during the 7-year period from 1998 to 2004.
Lazarov A
Contact Dermatitis; 2006 Aug; 55(2):73-6. PubMed ID: 16930229
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Contact allergies in the German workforce : Data of the IVDK network from 2003-2013].
Bauer A; Geier J; Mahler V; Uter W
Hautarzt; 2015 Sep; 66(9):652-64. PubMed ID: 26228172
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Relationship of occupation to contact dermatitis: evaluation in patients tested from 1998 to 2000.
Rietschel RL; Mathias CG; Fowler JF; Pratt M; Taylor JS; Sherertz EF; Marks JG; Belsito DV; Storrs FJ; Maibach HI; Fransway AF; Deleo VA;
Am J Contact Dermat; 2002 Dec; 13(4):170-6. PubMed ID: 12478531
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Contact sensitivity to standard series allergens in 1038 patients with contact dermatitis in Turkey.
Akyol A; Boyvat A; Peksari Y; Gürgey E
Contact Dermatitis; 2005 Jun; 52(6):333-7. PubMed ID: 15932585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Reproducibility of patch test results: a concurrent right-versus-left study using TRUE Test.
Ale SI; Maibach HI
Contact Dermatitis; 2004 May; 50(5):304-12. PubMed ID: 15209812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Patch test results with the metalworking fluid series of the German Contact Dermatitis Research Group (DKG).
Geier J; Lessmann H; Dickel H; Frosch PJ; Koch P; Becker D; Jappe U; Aberer W; Schnuch A; Uter W
Contact Dermatitis; 2004 Sep; 51(3):118-30. PubMed ID: 15479200
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Sensitizations to allergens of TRUE test in 864 consecutive eczema patients in Israel.
Magen E; Mishal J; Schlesinger M
Contact Dermatitis; 2006 Dec; 55(6):370-1. PubMed ID: 17101019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Patch test results from the Mayo Clinic Contact Dermatitis Group, 1998-2000.
Wetter DA; Davis MD; Yiannias JA; Cheng JF; Connolly SM; el-Azhary RA; Farmer SA; Fett DD; Johnson JS; Linehan DL; Richardson DM; Schroeter AL
J Am Acad Dermatol; 2005 Sep; 53(3):416-21. PubMed ID: 16112346
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Common contact sensitizers in the Czech Republic. Patch test results in 12,058 patients with suspected contact dermatitis*.
Machovcova A; Dastychova E; Kostalova D; Vojtechovska A; Reslova J; Smejkalova D; Vaneckova J; Vocilkova A
Contact Dermatitis; 2005 Sep; 53(3):162-6. PubMed ID: 16128756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Occupational skin disease in the construction industry.
Bock M; Schmidt A; Bruckner T; Diepgen TL
Br J Dermatol; 2003 Dec; 149(6):1165-71. PubMed ID: 14674893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Contact allergy in children referred for patch testing: North American Contact Dermatitis Group data, 2001-2004.
Zug KA; McGinley-Smith D; Warshaw EM; Taylor JS; Rietschel RL; Maibach HI; Belsito DV; Fowler JF; Storrs FJ; DeLeo VA; Marks JG; Mathias CG; Pratt MD; Sasseville D
Arch Dermatol; 2008 Oct; 144(10):1329-36. PubMed ID: 18936397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
