These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

80 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1207102)

  • 21. Speech recognition in noise, temporal and spectral resolution in normal and impaired hearing.
    Arlinger S; Dryselius H
    Acta Otolaryngol Suppl; 1990; 469():30-7. PubMed ID: 2356736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Speech recognition in noise: estimating effects of compressive nonlinearities in the basilar-membrane response.
    Horwitz AR; Ahlstrom JB; Dubno JR
    Ear Hear; 2007 Sep; 28(5):682-93. PubMed ID: 17804982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Release from masking of low-frequency complex tones by high-frequency complex tone cue bands.
    Josupeit A; Hohmann V; van de Par S
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Dec; 132(6):EL450-5. PubMed ID: 23231207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Hearing gain with a BAHA test-band in patients with single-sided deafness.
    Kim DY; Kim TS; Shim BS; Jin IS; Ahn JH; Chung JW; Yoon TH; Park HJ
    Am J Otolaryngol; 2014; 35(1):37-41. PubMed ID: 24035184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Consonant-feature transmission as a function of presentation level in hearing-impaired listeners.
    Gutnick HN
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1982 Oct; 72(4):1124-30. PubMed ID: 7142577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Identification and discrimination of vowel-consonant syllables in listeners with sensorineural hearing loss.
    Reed C
    J Speech Hear Res; 1975 Dec; 18(4):773-94. PubMed ID: 1207107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Dichotic listening in adults with sensorineural hearing loss.
    Roeser RJ; Johns DF; Price LL
    J Am Audiol Soc; 1976; 2(1):19-25. PubMed ID: 965275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. High-level psychophysical tuning curves: forward masking in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.
    Nelson DA
    J Speech Hear Res; 1991 Dec; 34(6):1233-49. PubMed ID: 1787705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Consonant identification in noise using Hilbert-transform temporal fine-structure speech and recovered-envelope speech for listeners with normal and impaired hearing.
    Léger AC; Reed CM; Desloge JG; Swaminathan J; Braida LD
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Jul; 138(1):389-403. PubMed ID: 26233038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Auditory filter characteristics and consonant recognition for hearing-impaired listeners.
    Dubno JR; Dirks DD
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1989 Apr; 85(4):1666-75. PubMed ID: 2708682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Benefits of audibility for listeners with severe high-frequency hearing loss.
    Simpson A; McDermott HJ; Dowell RC
    Hear Res; 2005 Dec; 210(1-2):42-52. PubMed ID: 16137848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. [Upward spread of masking in normal and abnormal ears].
    Picard M; Couture-Metz F
    Audiology; 1985; 24(2):81-91. PubMed ID: 3994593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Speech pattern hearing aids for the profoundly hearing impaired: speech perception and auditory abilities.
    Faulkner A; Ball V; Rosen S; Moore BC; Fourcin A
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1992 Apr; 91(4 Pt 1):2136-55. PubMed ID: 1597605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Comodulation masking release in consonant recognition.
    Kwon BJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2002 Aug; 112(2):634-41. PubMed ID: 12186043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Children's speech recognition scores: the Speech Intelligibility Index and proficiency factors for age and hearing level.
    Scollie SD
    Ear Hear; 2008 Aug; 29(4):543-56. PubMed ID: 18469717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Tone-glide discrimination: normal and hearing-impaired listeners.
    Collins MJ
    J Speech Hear Res; 1984 Sep; 27(3):403-12. PubMed ID: 6482410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Effect of contralateral noise on the middle components of the averaged electroencephalic response.
    Gutnick HN; Goldstein R
    J Speech Hear Res; 1978 Dec; 21(4):613-24. PubMed ID: 745364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Comodulation masking release as a function of bandwidth and time delay between on-frequency and flanking-band maskers.
    Moore BC; Schooneveldt GP
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1990 Aug; 88(2):725-31. PubMed ID: 2212296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Comb-filtered speech as a tool to demonstrate difficulties of speech perception and the importance of auditory training in cochlear implant users.
    Petrov SM; Pisareva NY
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2011 Feb; 12(1):48-52. PubMed ID: 21756459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Detection of interaural phase shift between a subaudible and an audible tone.
    Ayres TJ; Clack TD
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1984 Aug; 76(2):411-3. PubMed ID: 6480992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.