These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12071396)

  • 1. The effects of interpolated reinforcement on resistance to extinction in children diagnosed with autism: a preliminary investigation.
    Higbee TS; Carr JE; Patel MR
    Res Dev Disabil; 2002; 23(1):61-78. PubMed ID: 12071396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparing autistic and normal children along the dimensions of reinforcement maximization, stimulus sampling, and responsiveness to extinction.
    Mullins M; Rincover A
    J Exp Child Psychol; 1985 Oct; 40(2):350-74. PubMed ID: 4045384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. An investigation of extinction-induced vocalizations.
    Valentino AL; Shillingsburg MA; Call NA; Burton B; Bowen CN
    Behav Modif; 2011 May; 35(3):284-98. PubMed ID: 21398308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Responding maintained by intermittent reinforcement: implications for the use of extinction with problem behavior in clinical settings.
    Lerman DC; Iwata BA; Shore BA; Kahng SW
    J Appl Behav Anal; 1996; 29(2):153-71. PubMed ID: 8682734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A comparison of two behaviour reduction procedures: traditional extinction alone and interpolated reinforcement followed by extinction.
    Schmid TL
    J Ment Defic Res; 1988 Aug; 32 ( Pt 4)():289-300. PubMed ID: 2975335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Sequential contrast effects with retarded subjects after discrimination learning with and without errors.
    Lambert JL
    Br J Psychol; 1977 Feb; 68(1):77-83. PubMed ID: 856374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The effect of brief delays to reinforcement on the acquisition of tacts in children with autism.
    Majdalany L; Wilder DA; Smeltz L; Lipschultz J
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2016 Jun; 49(2):411-5. PubMed ID: 26792114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. An investigation of differential reinforcement of alternative behavior without extinction.
    Athens ES; Vollmer TR
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2010; 43(4):569-89. PubMed ID: 21541145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Resistance to extinction and frustration in retarded and nonretarded children.
    Viney LL; Clarke AM; Lord J
    Am J Ment Defic; 1973 Nov; 78(3):308-15. PubMed ID: 4769174
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Separate and combined effects of visual schedules and extinction plus differential reinforcement on problem behavior occasioned by transitions.
    Waters MB; Lerman DC; Hovanetz AN
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2009; 42(2):309-13. PubMed ID: 19949517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The effects of differential reinforcement of unprompted responding on the skill acquisition of children with autism.
    Karsten AM; Carr JE
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2009; 42(2):327-34. PubMed ID: 19949520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The use of a discrimination-training procedure to teach mand variability to children with autism.
    Brodhead MT; Higbee TS; Gerencser KR; Akers JS
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2016 Mar; 49(1):34-48. PubMed ID: 26696376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. An evaluation of strategies to maintain mands at practical levels.
    Sidener TM; Shabani DB; Carr JE; Roland JP
    Res Dev Disabil; 2006; 27(6):632-44. PubMed ID: 16298103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The effects of schedule of reinforcement on stimulus overselectivity in autistic children.
    Koegel RL; Schreibman L; Britten K; Laitinen R
    J Autism Dev Disord; 1979 Dec; 9(4):383-96. PubMed ID: 521431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Noncontingent escape as treatment for self-injurious behavior maintained by negative reinforcement.
    Vollmer TR; Marcus BA; Ringdahl JE
    J Appl Behav Anal; 1995; 28(1):15-26. PubMed ID: 7706146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The effects of summated stimuli with retarded children.
    Melnick J
    J Exp Child Psychol; 1972 Oct; 14(2):277-86. PubMed ID: 4651280
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Individual differences in the severely retarded child in acquisition, stimulus generalization, and extinction in go-no-go discrimination learning.
    Evans PL; Hogg JH
    J Exp Child Psychol; 1975 Dec; 20(3):377-90. PubMed ID: 1206354
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Decreased resistance to extinction in ob/ob mice following operant training.
    Reynolds MA; Goodrick CL; Ingram DK
    Physiol Behav; 1982 Oct; 29(4):643-7. PubMed ID: 7178268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Treatment of resistance to change in children with autism.
    Fisher WW; Felber JM; Phillips LA; Craig AR; Paden AR; Niemeier JJ
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2019 Oct; 52(4):974-993. PubMed ID: 31219184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Extinction by retarded children following discrimination learning with and without errors.
    Lambert JL
    Am J Ment Defic; 1975 Nov; 80(3):286-91. PubMed ID: 1190268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.