These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

212 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12072201)

  • 1. Spectrum of genetic changes in gastro-esophageal cancer cell lines determined by an integrated molecular cytogenetic approach.
    Rosenberg C; Geelen E; IJszenga MJ; Pearson P; Tanke HJ; Dinjens WN; van Dekken H
    Cancer Genet Cytogenet; 2002 May; 135(1):35-41. PubMed ID: 12072201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparative genomic hybridization of cancer of the gastroesophageal junction: deletion of 14Q31-32.1 discriminates between esophageal (Barrett's) and gastric cardia adenocarcinomas.
    van Dekken H; Geelen E; Dinjens WN; Wijnhoven BP; Tilanus HW; Tanke HJ; Rosenberg C
    Cancer Res; 1999 Feb; 59(3):748-52. PubMed ID: 9973227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Array comparative genomic hybridization, expression array, and protein analysis of critical regions on chromosome arms 1q, 7q, and 8p in adenocarcinomas of the gastroesophageal junction.
    van Dekken H; Tilanus HW; Hop WC; Dinjens WN; Wink JC; Vissers KJ; van Marion R
    Cancer Genet Cytogenet; 2009 Feb; 189(1):37-42. PubMed ID: 19167610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. High-resolution array comparative genomic hybridization of chromosome 8q: evaluation of putative progression markers for gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinomas.
    van Duin M; van Marion R; Vissers KJ; Hop WC; Dinjens WN; Tilanus HW; Siersema PD; van Dekken H
    Cytogenet Genome Res; 2007; 118(2-4):130-7. PubMed ID: 18000363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Molecular cytogenetic analysis of non-small cell lung carcinoma by spectral karyotyping and comparative genomic hybridization.
    Luk C; Tsao MS; Bayani J; Shepherd F; Squire JA
    Cancer Genet Cytogenet; 2001 Mar; 125(2):87-99. PubMed ID: 11369051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Genomic alterations in lung adenocarcinomas detected by multicolor fluorescence in situ hybridization and comparative genomic hybridization.
    Shen H; Zhu Y; Wu YJ; Qiu HR; Shu YQ
    Cancer Genet Cytogenet; 2008 Mar; 181(2):100-7. PubMed ID: 18295661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Clustering of molecular alterations in gastroesophageal carcinomas.
    Koon N; Zaika A; Moskaluk CA; Frierson HF; Knuutila S; Powell SM; El-Rifai W
    Neoplasia; 2004; 6(2):143-9. PubMed ID: 15140403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Genotypic analysis of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma by molecular cytogenetics and real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction.
    Yen CC; Chen YJ; Lu KH; Hsia JY; Chen JT; Hu CP; Chen PM; Liu JH; Chiou TJ; Wang WS; Yang MH; Chao TC; Lin CH
    Int J Oncol; 2003 Oct; 23(4):871-81. PubMed ID: 12963965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Consistent genetic alterations in xenografts of proximal stomach and gastro-esophageal junction adenocarcinomas.
    El-Rifai W; Harper JC; Cummings OW; Hyytinen ER; Frierson HF; Knuutila S; Powell SM
    Cancer Res; 1998 Jan; 58(1):34-7. PubMed ID: 9426053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A combination of molecular cytogenetic analyses reveals complex genetic alterations in conventional renal cell carcinoma.
    Strefford JC; Stasevich I; Lane TM; Lu YJ; Oliver T; Young BD
    Cancer Genet Cytogenet; 2005 May; 159(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 15860350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Genomic aberrations in carcinomas of the uterine corpus.
    Micci F; Teixeira MR; Haugom L; Kristensen G; Abeler VM; Heim S
    Genes Chromosomes Cancer; 2004 Jul; 40(3):229-46. PubMed ID: 15139002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Genomic array and expression analysis of frequent high-level amplifications in adenocarcinomas of the gastro-esophageal junction.
    van Dekken H; Vissers K; Tilanus HW; Kuo WL; Tanke HJ; Rosenberg C; Ijszenga M; Szuhai K
    Cancer Genet Cytogenet; 2006 Apr; 166(2):157-62. PubMed ID: 16631473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Chromosomal imbalances in gastric and esophageal adenocarcinoma: specific comparative genomic hybridization-detected abnormalities segregate with junctional adenocarcinomas.
    Stocks SC; Pratt N; Sales M; Johnston DA; Thompson AM; Carey FA; Kernohan NM
    Genes Chromosomes Cancer; 2001 Sep; 32(1):50-8. PubMed ID: 11477661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Chromosomal imbalances in Barrett's adenocarcinoma and the metaplasia-dysplasia-carcinoma sequence.
    Walch AK; Zitzelsberger HF; Bruch J; Keller G; Angermeier D; Aubele MM; Mueller J; Stein H; Braselmann H; Siewert JR; Höfler H; Werner M
    Am J Pathol; 2000 Feb; 156(2):555-66. PubMed ID: 10666385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Characterization of genetic rearrangements in esophageal squamous carcinoma cell lines by a combination of M-FISH and array-CGH: further confirmation of some split genomic regions in primary tumors.
    Hao JJ; Shi ZZ; Zhao ZX; Zhang Y; Gong T; Li CX; Zhan T; Cai Y; Dong JT; Fu SB; Zhan QM; Wang MR
    BMC Cancer; 2012 Aug; 12():367. PubMed ID: 22920630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Molecular cytogenetic characterization of nasopharyngeal carcinoma cell lines and xenografts by comparative genomic hybridization and spectral karyotyping.
    Wong N; Hui AB; Fan B; Lo KW; Pang E; Leung SF; Huang DP; Johnson PJ
    Cancer Genet Cytogenet; 2003 Jan; 140(2):124-32. PubMed ID: 12645650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comprehensive molecular cytogenetic characterization of cervical cancer cell lines.
    Harris CP; Lu XY; Narayan G; Singh B; Murty VV; Rao PH
    Genes Chromosomes Cancer; 2003 Mar; 36(3):233-41. PubMed ID: 12557223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparative genomic hybridization of esophageal and gastroesophageal adenocarcinomas shows consensus areas of DNA gain and loss.
    Moskaluk CA; Hu J; Perlman EJ
    Genes Chromosomes Cancer; 1998 Aug; 22(4):305-11. PubMed ID: 9669668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparative genomic hybridization: comparison between esophageal squamous cell carcinoma and gastric cardia adenocarcinoma from a high-incidence area for both cancers in Henan, northern China.
    Wang LD; Qin YR; Fan ZM; Kwong D; Guan XY; Tsao GS; Sham J; Li JL; Feng XS
    Dis Esophagus; 2006; 19(6):459-67. PubMed ID: 17069589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Multicolor fluorescence in situ hybridization and comparative genomic hybridization reveal molecular events in lung adenocarcinomas and squamous cell lung carcinomas.
    Shen H; Gao W; Wu YJ; Qiu HR; Shu YQ
    Biomed Pharmacother; 2009 Jul; 63(6):396-403. PubMed ID: 18848758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.