These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
12. Clinical evaluation of the Clarion CII HiFocus 1 with and without positioner. van der Beek FB; Boermans PP; Verbist BM; Briaire JJ; Frijns JH Ear Hear; 2005 Dec; 26(6):577-92. PubMed ID: 16377994 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparisons between neural response imaging thresholds, electrically evoked auditory reflex thresholds and most comfortable loudness levels in CII bionic ear users with HiResolution sound processing strategies. Han DM; Chen XQ; Zhao XT; Kong Y; Li YX; Liu S; Liu B; Mo LY Acta Otolaryngol; 2005 Jul; 125(7):732-5. PubMed ID: 16012035 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of speech processing strategies used in the Clarion implant processor. Loizou PC; Stickney G; Mishra L; Assmann P Ear Hear; 2003 Feb; 24(1):12-9. PubMed ID: 12598809 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Postlingually Deafened Adult Cochlear Implant Users With Prolonged Recovery From Neural Adaptation at the Level of the Auditory Nerve Tend to Have Poorer Speech Perception Performance. He S; Skidmore J; Carter BL; Lemeshow S; Sun S Ear Hear; 2022 Nov-Dec 01; 43(6):1761-1770. PubMed ID: 35652833 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Toward a battery of behavioral and objective measures to achieve optimal cochlear implant stimulation levels in children. Gordon KA; Papsin BC; Harrison RV Ear Hear; 2004 Oct; 25(5):447-63. PubMed ID: 15599192 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The electrically evoked auditory change complex: preliminary results from nucleus cochlear implant users. Brown CJ; Etler C; He S; O'Brien S; Erenberg S; Kim JR; Dhuldhoya AN; Abbas PJ Ear Hear; 2008 Oct; 29(5):704-17. PubMed ID: 18596644 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Recognition of speech presented at soft to loud levels by adult cochlear implant recipients of three cochlear implant systems. Firszt JB; Holden LK; Skinner MW; Tobey EA; Peterson A; Gaggl W; Runge-Samuelson CL; Wackym PA Ear Hear; 2004 Aug; 25(4):375-87. PubMed ID: 15292777 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluation of the benefit for cochlear implantees of two assistive directional microphone systems in an artificial diffuse noise situation. van der Beek FB; Soede W; Frijns JH Ear Hear; 2007 Feb; 28(1):99-110. PubMed ID: 17204902 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]