These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

76 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12073503)

  • 41. Screening for breast and cervical cancer in a large German city: participation, motivation and knowledge of risk factors.
    Klug SJ; Hetzer M; Blettner M
    Eur J Public Health; 2005 Feb; 15(1):70-7. PubMed ID: 15788807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. The National Breast Screening Programme: the first 5,000 women screened in Northern Ireland.
    O'Doherty AJ; Crothers JG; Majury CW
    Ulster Med J; 1991 Oct; 60(2):150-3. PubMed ID: 1785147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Effectiveness of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Compared With Digital Mammography: Outcomes Analysis From 3 Years of Breast Cancer Screening.
    McDonald ES; Oustimov A; Weinstein SP; Synnestvedt MB; Schnall M; Conant EF
    JAMA Oncol; 2016 Jun; 2(6):737-43. PubMed ID: 26893205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Screening US in patients with mammographically dense breasts: initial experience with Connecticut Public Act 09-41.
    Hooley RJ; Greenberg KL; Stackhouse RM; Geisel JL; Butler RS; Philpotts LE
    Radiology; 2012 Oct; 265(1):59-69. PubMed ID: 22723501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Seventeen-years overview of breast cancer inside and outside screening in Denmark.
    Domingo L; Jacobsen KK; von Euler-Chelpin M; Vejborg I; Schwartz W; Sala M; Lynge E
    Acta Oncol; 2013 Jan; 52(1):48-56. PubMed ID: 22943386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. [Screening for breast cancer: worries about its effectiveness].
    Autier P
    Rev Prat; 2013 Dec; 63(10):1369-77. PubMed ID: 24579331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Development of a protocol for evaluation of mammographic surveillance services in women under 50 with a family history of breast cancer.
    Mackay J; Rogers C; Fielder H; Blamey R; Macmillan D; Boggis C; Brown J; Pharoah PD; Moss S; Day NE; Myles J; Austoker J; Gray J; Cuzick J; Duffy SW
    J Epidemiol Biostat; 2001; 6(5):365-9; discussion 371-5. PubMed ID: 11822726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Unilateral breast cancer: screening of contralateral breast by using preoperative MR imaging reduces incidence of metachronous cancer.
    Kim JY; Cho N; Koo HR; Yi A; Kim WH; Lee SH; Chang JM; Han W; Moon HG; Im SA; Noh DY; Moon WK
    Radiology; 2013 Apr; 267(1):57-66. PubMed ID: 23329656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Investigating informed choice in screening programmes: a mixed methods analysis.
    Tyldesley-Marshall N; Grove A; Ghosh I; Kudrna L; Ayorinde A; Singh M; Mehaan E; Clarke A; Taylor-Phillips S; Al-Khudairy L
    BMC Public Health; 2022 Dec; 22(1):2319. PubMed ID: 36510247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Early detection of breast cancer: the utilization of mammography in Germany.
    Starker A; Kraywinkel K; Kuhnert R
    J Health Monit; 2017 Dec; 2(4):69-75. PubMed ID: 37168129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Chopped liver...all over again.
    Kopans DB
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2002 May; 178(5):1288; author reply 1288-9. PubMed ID: 11959750
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Cancer screening review diminishes informed choice.
    McCartney M
    BMJ; 2019 Oct; 367():l6224. PubMed ID: 31672702
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Debating the desirability of new biomedical technologies: lessons from the introduction of breast cancer screening in the Netherlands.
    Boenink M
    Health Care Anal; 2012 Mar; 20(1):84-102. PubMed ID: 21499812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Informed choice requires information about both benefits and harms.
    Jørgensen KJ; Brodersen J; Hartling OJ; Nielsen M; Gøtzsche PC
    J Med Ethics; 2009 Apr; 35(4):268-9. PubMed ID: 19332586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. [Tailored Breast Screening Trial (TBST)].
    Paci E; Mantellini P; Giorgi Rossi P; Falini P; Puliti D;
    Epidemiol Prev; 2013; 37(4-5):317-27. PubMed ID: 24293498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Do women make an informed choice about participating in breast cancer screening? A survey among women invited for a first mammography screening examination.
    van Agt H; Fracheboud J; van der Steen A; de Koning H
    Patient Educ Couns; 2012 Nov; 89(2):353-9. PubMed ID: 22963769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. [Mammography screening].
    Zwahlen M; Egger M
    Ther Umsch; 2013 Apr; 70(4):205-12; discussion 212-3. PubMed ID: 23535547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. [Breast cancer screening lacking effectiveness].
    Giard RW; Bonneux LG
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2001 Nov; 145(46):2205-8. PubMed ID: 11757241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. [The biased information given to women about population screening for breast cancer makes a well considered informed choice to participate unlikely].
    van Maanen H
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2002 Jun; 146(22):1026-8. PubMed ID: 12073503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.