447 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12074223)
1. Influence of anesthetic flow rate delivered by the Wand Local Anesthetic System on pain response to palatal injections.
Primosch RE; Brooks R
Am J Dent; 2002 Feb; 15(1):15-20. PubMed ID: 12074223
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Influence of site preparation methods on the pain reported during palatal infiltration using the Wand Local Anesthetic System.
Johnson J; Primosch RE
Am J Dent; 2003 Jun; 16(3):165-9. PubMed ID: 12967069
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The Wand vs. traditional injection: a comparison of pain related behaviors.
Gibson RS; Allen K; Hutfless S; Beiraghi S
Pediatr Dent; 2000; 22(6):458-62. PubMed ID: 11132503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Pain perception and utility: a comparison of the syringe and computerized local injection techniques.
Nicholson JW; Berry TG; Summitt JB; Yuan CH; Witten TM
Gen Dent; 2001; 49(2):167-73. PubMed ID: 12004696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The assessment of pain sensation during local anesthesia using a computerized local anesthesia (Wand) and a conventional syringe.
Ram D; Peretz B
J Dent Child (Chic); 2003; 70(2):130-3. PubMed ID: 14528773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Pain behaviour and distress in children during two sequential dental visits: comparing a computerised anaesthesia delivery system and a traditional syringe.
Versloot J; Veerkamp JS; Hoogstraten J
Br Dent J; 2008 Jul; 205(1):E2; discussion 30-1. PubMed ID: 18493254
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The wand in pulp therapy: an alternative to inferior alveolar nerve block.
Oztaş N; Ulusu T; Bodur H; Doğan C
Quintessence Int; 2005; 36(7-8):559-64. PubMed ID: 15997937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Computerized local anesthetic delivery vs. traditional syringe technique. Subjective pain response.
Hochman M; Chiarello D; Hochman CB; Lopatkin R; Pergola S
N Y State Dent J; 1997; 63(7):24-9. PubMed ID: 9297957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A 21st century computerized injection system for local pain control.
Friedman MJ; Hochman MN
Compend Contin Educ Dent; 1997 Oct; 18(10):995-1000, 1002-3; quiz 1004. PubMed ID: 9533309
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A comparison of injection pain and postoperative pain of two intraosseous anesthetic techniques.
Gallatin J; Nusstein J; Reader A; Beck M; Weaver J
Anesth Prog; 2003; 50(3):111-20. PubMed ID: 14558586
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of injection pain, heart rate increase, and postinjection pain of articaine and lidocaine in a primary intraligamentary injection administered with a computer-controlled local anesthetic delivery system.
Nusstein J; Berlin J; Reader A; Beck M; Weaver JM
Anesth Prog; 2004; 51(4):126-33. PubMed ID: 15675261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of the efficiencies of permanent maxillary tooth removal performed with single buccal infiltration versus routine buccal and palatal injection.
Fan S; Chen WL; Yang ZH; Huang ZQ
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2009 Mar; 107(3):359-63. PubMed ID: 18996033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of the Wand with a conventional technique.
Sumer M; Misir F; Koyuturk AE
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2006 Jun; 101(6):e106-9. PubMed ID: 16731373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Efficacy of anterior and middle superior alveolar (AMSA) anesthesia using a new injection system: the Wand.
Fukayama H; Yoshikawa F; Kohase H; Umino M; Suzuki N
Quintessence Int; 2003; 34(7):537-41. PubMed ID: 12946073
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of topical anesthetics (EMLA/Oraqix vs. benzocaine) on pain experienced during palatal needle injection.
Al-Melh MA; Andersson L
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2007 May; 103(5):e16-20. PubMed ID: 17331753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Injection pain and postinjection pain of the palatal-anterior superior alveolar injection, administered with the Wand Plus system, comparing 2% lidocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine to 3% mepivacaine.
Nusstein J; Burns Y; Reader A; Beck M; Weaver J
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2004 Feb; 97(2):164-72. PubMed ID: 14970775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of a computerized anesthesia device with a traditional syringe in preschool children.
Allen KD; Kotil D; Larzelere RE; Hutfless S; Beiraghi S
Pediatr Dent; 2002; 24(4):315-20. PubMed ID: 12212873
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A prospective, randomized, single-blind comparative evaluation of anesthetic efficacy of posterior superior alveolar nerve blocks, buccal infiltrations, and buccal plus palatal infiltrations in patients with irreversible pulpitis.
Aggarwal V; Singla M; Miglani S; Ansari I; Kohli S
J Endod; 2011 Nov; 37(11):1491-4. PubMed ID: 22000449
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation of prilocaine for the reduction of pain associated with transmucosal anesthetic administration.
Kramp LF; Eleazer PD; Scheetz JP
Anesth Prog; 1999; 46(2):52-5. PubMed ID: 10853565
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A comparison of intraoral injection discomfort produced by plain and epinephrine-containing lidocaine local anesthetic solutions: a randomized, double-blind, split-mouth, volunteer investigation.
Meechan JG; Day PF
Anesth Prog; 2002; 49(2):44-8. PubMed ID: 15384291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
