These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
213 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12074393)
1. An integrated "4-phase" approach for setting endocrine disruption screening priorities--phase I and II predictions of estrogen receptor binding affinity. Shi L; Tong W; Fang H; Xie Q; Hong H; Perkins R; Wu J; Tu M; Blair RM; Branham WS; Waller C; Walker J; Sheehan DM SAR QSAR Environ Res; 2002 Mar; 13(1):69-88. PubMed ID: 12074393 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A reactivity pattern for discrimination of ER agonism and antagonism based on 3-D molecular attributes. Schmieder P; Koleva Y; Mekenyan O SAR QSAR Environ Res; 2002 Mar; 13(2):353-64. PubMed ID: 12071661 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Prediction of estrogen receptor binding for 58,000 chemicals using an integrated system of a tree-based model with structural alerts. Hong H; Tong W; Fang H; Shi L; Xie Q; Wu J; Perkins R; Walker JD; Branham W; Sheehan DM Environ Health Perspect; 2002 Jan; 110(1):29-36. PubMed ID: 11781162 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Screening of high production volume chemicals for estrogen receptor binding activity (II) by the MultiCASE expert system. Klopman G; Chakravarti SK Chemosphere; 2003 May; 51(6):461-8. PubMed ID: 12615097 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Endocrine disruptors: can biological effects and environmental risks be predicted? Witorsch RJ Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2002 Aug; 36(1):118-30. PubMed ID: 12383724 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. QSAR classification of estrogen receptor binders and pre-screening of potential pleiotropic EDCs. Li J; Gramatica P SAR QSAR Environ Res; 2010 Oct; 21(7-8):657-69. PubMed ID: 21120754 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Nature of the binding interaction for 50 structurally diverse chemicals with rat estrogen receptors. Laws SC; Yavanhxay S; Cooper RL; Eldridge JC Toxicol Sci; 2006 Nov; 94(1):46-56. PubMed ID: 16940337 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Structure-activity relationship study of a diverse set of estrogen receptor ligands (I) using MultiCASE expert system. Klopman G; Chakravarti SK Chemosphere; 2003 May; 51(6):445-59. PubMed ID: 12615096 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Relationship between the results of in vitro receptor binding assay to human estrogen receptor alpha and in vivo uterotrophic assay: comparative study with 65 selected chemicals. Akahori Y; Nakai M; Yamasaki K; Takatsuki M; Shimohigashi Y; Ohtaki M Toxicol In Vitro; 2008 Feb; 22(1):225-31. PubMed ID: 17904329 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Prediction of ligand binding affinity and orientation of xenoestrogens to the estrogen receptor by molecular dynamics simulations and the linear interaction energy method. van Lipzig MM; ter Laak AM; Jongejan A; Vermeulen NP; Wamelink M; Geerke D; Meerman JH J Med Chem; 2004 Feb; 47(4):1018-30. PubMed ID: 14761204 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Structure-activity approach to the identification of environmental estrogens: the MCASE approach. Cunningham AR; Cunningham SL; Rosenkranz HS SAR QSAR Environ Res; 2004 Feb; 15(1):55-67. PubMed ID: 15113069 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Molecular modeling for screening environmental chemicals for estrogenicity: use of the toxicant-target approach. Rabinowitz JR; Little SB; Laws SC; Goldsmith MR Chem Res Toxicol; 2009 Sep; 22(9):1594-602. PubMed ID: 19715353 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Xenoestrogens: mechanisms of action and some detection studies. Słomczyńska M Pol J Vet Sci; 2008; 11(3):263-9. PubMed ID: 18942551 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of estrogen receptor alpha and beta subtypes based on comparative molecular field analysis (CoMFA). Xing L; Welsh WJ; Tong W; Perkins R; Sheehan DM SAR QSAR Environ Res; 1999; 10(2-3):215-37. PubMed ID: 10491851 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparative molecular field analysis (CoMFA) model using a large diverse set of natural, synthetic and environmental chemicals for binding to the androgen receptor. Hong H; Fang H; Xie Q; Perkins R; Sheehan DM; Tong W SAR QSAR Environ Res; 2003; 14(5-6):373-88. PubMed ID: 14758981 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Classification and virtual screening of androgen receptor antagonists. Li J; Gramatica P J Chem Inf Model; 2010 May; 50(5):861-74. PubMed ID: 20405856 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Xenoestrogens: mechanisms of action and detection methods. Mueller SO Anal Bioanal Chem; 2004 Feb; 378(3):582-7. PubMed ID: 14564443 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Estrogenic effect of leachates and soil extracts from lysimeters spiked with sewage sludge and reference endocrine disrupters. Dizer H; Fischer B; Sepulveda I; Loffredo E; Senesi N; Santana F; Hansen PD Environ Toxicol; 2002; 17(2):105-12. PubMed ID: 11979588 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. FIFRA Subdivision F testing Guidelines: are these tests adequate to detect potential hormonal activity for crop protection chemicals? Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act. Stevens JT; Tobia A; Lamb JC; Tellone C; O'Neal F J Toxicol Environ Health; 1997 Apr; 50(5):415-31. PubMed ID: 9140462 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]