217 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12074393)
1. An integrated "4-phase" approach for setting endocrine disruption screening priorities--phase I and II predictions of estrogen receptor binding affinity.
Shi L; Tong W; Fang H; Xie Q; Hong H; Perkins R; Wu J; Tu M; Blair RM; Branham WS; Waller C; Walker J; Sheehan DM
SAR QSAR Environ Res; 2002 Mar; 13(1):69-88. PubMed ID: 12074393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A reactivity pattern for discrimination of ER agonism and antagonism based on 3-D molecular attributes.
Schmieder P; Koleva Y; Mekenyan O
SAR QSAR Environ Res; 2002 Mar; 13(2):353-64. PubMed ID: 12071661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Prediction of estrogen receptor binding for 58,000 chemicals using an integrated system of a tree-based model with structural alerts.
Hong H; Tong W; Fang H; Shi L; Xie Q; Wu J; Perkins R; Walker JD; Branham W; Sheehan DM
Environ Health Perspect; 2002 Jan; 110(1):29-36. PubMed ID: 11781162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Screening of high production volume chemicals for estrogen receptor binding activity (II) by the MultiCASE expert system.
Klopman G; Chakravarti SK
Chemosphere; 2003 May; 51(6):461-8. PubMed ID: 12615097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Endocrine disruptors: can biological effects and environmental risks be predicted?
Witorsch RJ
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2002 Aug; 36(1):118-30. PubMed ID: 12383724
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. QSAR classification of estrogen receptor binders and pre-screening of potential pleiotropic EDCs.
Li J; Gramatica P
SAR QSAR Environ Res; 2010 Oct; 21(7-8):657-69. PubMed ID: 21120754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Nature of the binding interaction for 50 structurally diverse chemicals with rat estrogen receptors.
Laws SC; Yavanhxay S; Cooper RL; Eldridge JC
Toxicol Sci; 2006 Nov; 94(1):46-56. PubMed ID: 16940337
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Structure-activity relationship study of a diverse set of estrogen receptor ligands (I) using MultiCASE expert system.
Klopman G; Chakravarti SK
Chemosphere; 2003 May; 51(6):445-59. PubMed ID: 12615096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Relationship between the results of in vitro receptor binding assay to human estrogen receptor alpha and in vivo uterotrophic assay: comparative study with 65 selected chemicals.
Akahori Y; Nakai M; Yamasaki K; Takatsuki M; Shimohigashi Y; Ohtaki M
Toxicol In Vitro; 2008 Feb; 22(1):225-31. PubMed ID: 17904329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Prediction of ligand binding affinity and orientation of xenoestrogens to the estrogen receptor by molecular dynamics simulations and the linear interaction energy method.
van Lipzig MM; ter Laak AM; Jongejan A; Vermeulen NP; Wamelink M; Geerke D; Meerman JH
J Med Chem; 2004 Feb; 47(4):1018-30. PubMed ID: 14761204
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Structure-activity approach to the identification of environmental estrogens: the MCASE approach.
Cunningham AR; Cunningham SL; Rosenkranz HS
SAR QSAR Environ Res; 2004 Feb; 15(1):55-67. PubMed ID: 15113069
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Identification of putative estrogen receptor-mediated endocrine disrupting chemicals using QSAR- and structure-based virtual screening approaches.
Zhang L; Sedykh A; Tripathi A; Zhu H; Afantitis A; Mouchlis VD; Melagraki G; Rusyn I; Tropsha A
Toxicol Appl Pharmacol; 2013 Oct; 272(1):67-76. PubMed ID: 23707773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Molecular modeling for screening environmental chemicals for estrogenicity: use of the toxicant-target approach.
Rabinowitz JR; Little SB; Laws SC; Goldsmith MR
Chem Res Toxicol; 2009 Sep; 22(9):1594-602. PubMed ID: 19715353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Xenoestrogens: mechanisms of action and some detection studies.
Słomczyńska M
Pol J Vet Sci; 2008; 11(3):263-9. PubMed ID: 18942551
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of estrogen receptor alpha and beta subtypes based on comparative molecular field analysis (CoMFA).
Xing L; Welsh WJ; Tong W; Perkins R; Sheehan DM
SAR QSAR Environ Res; 1999; 10(2-3):215-37. PubMed ID: 10491851
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparative molecular field analysis (CoMFA) model using a large diverse set of natural, synthetic and environmental chemicals for binding to the androgen receptor.
Hong H; Fang H; Xie Q; Perkins R; Sheehan DM; Tong W
SAR QSAR Environ Res; 2003; 14(5-6):373-88. PubMed ID: 14758981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Classification and virtual screening of androgen receptor antagonists.
Li J; Gramatica P
J Chem Inf Model; 2010 May; 50(5):861-74. PubMed ID: 20405856
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Xenoestrogens: mechanisms of action and detection methods.
Mueller SO
Anal Bioanal Chem; 2004 Feb; 378(3):582-7. PubMed ID: 14564443
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Estrogenic effect of leachates and soil extracts from lysimeters spiked with sewage sludge and reference endocrine disrupters.
Dizer H; Fischer B; Sepulveda I; Loffredo E; Senesi N; Santana F; Hansen PD
Environ Toxicol; 2002; 17(2):105-12. PubMed ID: 11979588
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. FIFRA Subdivision F testing Guidelines: are these tests adequate to detect potential hormonal activity for crop protection chemicals? Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act.
Stevens JT; Tobia A; Lamb JC; Tellone C; O'Neal F
J Toxicol Environ Health; 1997 Apr; 50(5):415-31. PubMed ID: 9140462
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
