648 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12074446)
1. In vitro osteoclast resorption of bone substitute biomaterials used for implant site augmentation: a pilot study.
Taylor JC; Cuff SE; Leger JP; Morra A; Anderson GI
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2002; 17(3):321-30. PubMed ID: 12074446
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Osteoclastogenesis on hydroxyapatite ceramics: the effect of carbonate substitution.
Spence G; Patel N; Brooks R; Bonfield W; Rushton N
J Biomed Mater Res A; 2010 Mar; 92(4):1292-300. PubMed ID: 19343778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The effects of varying degrees of allograft decalcification on cultured porcine osteoclast cells.
Herold RW; Pashley DH; Cuenin MF; Niagro F; Hokett SD; Peacock ME; Mailhot J; Borke J
J Periodontol; 2002 Feb; 73(2):213-9. PubMed ID: 11895288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Human osteoclast formation and activity on a xenogenous bone mineral.
Perrotti V; Nicholls BM; Horton MA; Piattelli A
J Biomed Mater Res A; 2009 Jul; 90(1):238-46. PubMed ID: 18496862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Attributes of Bio-Oss
Smith MM; Duncan WJ; Coates DE
J Periodontal Res; 2018 Feb; 53(1):80-90. PubMed ID: 28868669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of biomaterial implants in the dental socket: histological analysis in dogs.
Santos FA; Pochapski MT; Martins MC; Zenóbio EG; Spolidoro LC; Marcantonio E
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2010 Mar; 12(1):18-25. PubMed ID: 18783409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Alveolar ridge augmentation with Bio-Oss: a histologic study in humans.
Zitzmann NU; Schärer P; Marinello CP; Schüpbach P; Berglundh T
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2001 Jun; 21(3):288-95. PubMed ID: 11490406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The differential regulation of osteoblast and osteoclast activity by surface topography of hydroxyapatite coatings.
Costa DO; Prowse PD; Chrones T; Sims SM; Hamilton DW; Rizkalla AS; Dixon SJ
Biomaterials; 2013 Oct; 34(30):7215-26. PubMed ID: 23830579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A synthetic bioactive resorbable graft for predictable implant reconstruction: part one.
Valen M; Ganz SD
J Oral Implantol; 2002; 28(4):167-77. PubMed ID: 12498463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The surface microporosity of ceramic biomaterials influences the resorption capacity of osteoclasts.
Zimmer G; Rohrhofer A; Lewis K; Goessl A; Hoffmann O
J Biomed Mater Res A; 2013 Dec; 101(12):3365-71. PubMed ID: 23553950
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Resorbable and nonresorbable hydroxyapatite granules as bone graft substitutes in rabbit cortical defects.
Liljensten E; Adolfsson E; Strid KG; Thomsen P
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2003; 5(2):95-101. PubMed ID: 14536044
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. In vitro effects of particulate bone substitute materials on the resorption activity of human osteoclasts.
Russmueller G; Winkler L; Lieber R; Seemann R; Pirklbauer K; Perisanidis C; Kapeller B; Spassova E; Halwax E; Poeschl WP; Macfelda K; Moser D
Eur Cell Mater; 2017 Oct; 34():291-306. PubMed ID: 29064533
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Invitro study of adherent mandibular osteoblast-like cells on carrier materials.
Turhani D; Weissenböck M; Watzinger E; Yerit K; Cvikl B; Ewers R; Thurnher D
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2005 Jul; 34(5):543-50. PubMed ID: 16053876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Osteoclast differentiation from human blood precursors on biomimetic calcium-phosphate substrates.
Ciapetti G; Di Pompo G; Avnet S; Martini D; Diez-Escudero A; Montufar EB; Ginebra MP; Baldini N
Acta Biomater; 2017 Mar; 50():102-113. PubMed ID: 27940198
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Immunohistochemical characterization of nanocrystalline hydroxyapatite silica gel (NanoBone(r)) osteogenesis: a study on biopsies from human jaws.
Götz W; Gerber T; Michel B; Lossdörfer S; Henkel KO; Heinemann F
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008 Oct; 19(10):1016-26. PubMed ID: 18828818
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Predictable synthetic bone grafting procedures for implant reconstruction: part two.
Ganz SD; Valen M
J Oral Implantol; 2002; 28(4):178-83. PubMed ID: 12498464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Histologic findings in sinus augmentation with autogenous bone chips versus a bovine bone substitute.
Schlegel KA; Fichtner G; Schultze-Mosgau S; Wiltfang J
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2003; 18(1):53-8. PubMed ID: 12608669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Formation of osteoclast-like cells on HA and TCP ceramics.
Detsch R; Mayr H; Ziegler G
Acta Biomater; 2008 Jan; 4(1):139-48. PubMed ID: 17723325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. In vitro osteoclast formation and resorption of silicon-substituted hydroxyapatite ceramics.
Friederichs RJ; Brooks RA; Ueda M; Best SM
J Biomed Mater Res A; 2015 Oct; 103(10):3312-22. PubMed ID: 25847383
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Novel ceramic bone replacement material Osbone® in a comparative in vitro study with osteoblasts.
Bernhardt A; Lode A; Peters F; Gelinsky M
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2011 Jun; 22(6):651-7. PubMed ID: 21044164
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
