These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

104 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12074850)

  • 1. A Bayesian approach to estimate evoked potentials.
    Sparacino G; Milani S; Arslan E; Cobelli C
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2002 Jun; 68(3):233-48. PubMed ID: 12074850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A Bayesian method to estimate single-trial event-related potentials with application to the study of the P300 variability.
    D'Avanzo C; Schiff S; Amodio P; Sparacino G
    J Neurosci Methods; 2011 May; 198(1):114-24. PubMed ID: 21439324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A multi-task learning approach for the extraction of single-trial evoked potentials.
    D'Avanzo C; Goljahani A; Pillonetto G; De Nicolao G; Sparacino G
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2013 May; 110(2):125-36. PubMed ID: 23261078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Weighted averaging of evoked potentials.
    Davila CE; Mobin MS
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1992 Apr; 39(4):338-45. PubMed ID: 1592399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Analysis of visual evoked potentials through Wiener filtering applied to a small number of sweeps.
    Cerutti S; Bersani V; Carrara A; Liberati D
    J Biomed Eng; 1987 Jan; 9(1):3-12. PubMed ID: 3795902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A new combination: scale-space filtering of projected brain activities.
    Aydin S
    Med Biol Eng Comput; 2009 Apr; 47(4):435-40. PubMed ID: 19205770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Does filtering and smoothing of average evoked potentials really pay? A statistical comparison.
    Möcks J; Gasser T; Köhler W; De Weerd JP
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1986 Nov; 64(5):469-80. PubMed ID: 2428597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Peak component latency-corrected average method for evoked potential waveform estimation.
    Yu XH; Zhang YS; He ZY
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1994 Nov; 41(11):1072-82. PubMed ID: 8001996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Trimmed estimators for robust averaging of event-related potentials.
    Leonowicz Z; Karvanen J; Shishkin SL
    J Neurosci Methods; 2005 Mar; 142(1):17-26. PubMed ID: 15652613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Nonlinear alignment and averaging for estimating the evoked potential.
    Gupta L; Molfese DL; Tammana R; Simos PG
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1996 Apr; 43(4):348-56. PubMed ID: 8626184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Automatic denoising of single-trial evoked potentials.
    Ahmadi M; Quian Quiroga R
    Neuroimage; 2013 Feb; 66():672-80. PubMed ID: 23142653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Estimation of auditory brainstem response, ABR, by means of Bayesian inference.
    Elberling C; Wahlgreen O
    Scand Audiol; 1985; 14(2):89-96. PubMed ID: 4023604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Single-trial dynamical estimation of event-related potentials: a Kalman filter-based approach.
    Georgiadis SD; Ranta-aho PO; Tarvainen MP; Karjalainen PA
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2005 Aug; 52(8):1397-406. PubMed ID: 16119235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Sorted averaging improves quality of auditory steady-state responses.
    Rahne T; Verhey JL; Mühler R
    J Neurosci Methods; 2013 May; 216(1):28-32. PubMed ID: 23603663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effects of artefact rejection and Bayesian weighted averaging on the efficiency of recording the newborn ABR.
    Lightfoot G; Stevens J
    Ear Hear; 2014; 35(2):213-20. PubMed ID: 24196419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Methods for improving the signal-to-noise ratio of endogenous-evoked potentials.
    Vincent A
    Integr Physiol Behav Sci; 1992; 27(1):54-65. PubMed ID: 1576088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Accuracy of measurement in electrically evoked compound action potentials.
    Hey M; Müller-Deile J
    J Neurosci Methods; 2015 Jan; 239():214-22. PubMed ID: 25455343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Bayesian EEG source localization using a structured sparsity prior.
    Costa F; Batatia H; Oberlin T; D'Giano C; Tourneret JY
    Neuroimage; 2017 Jan; 144(Pt A):142-152. PubMed ID: 27639353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Estimation of evoked potentials based on MD criterion and Givens matrix in non-Gaussian noise environments].
    Zha D; Gao Y; Xiong M; Wu L; Qiu T
    Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi; 2010 Jun; 27(3):495-9. PubMed ID: 20649005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Single-trial evoked potential estimation: comparison between independent component analysis and wavelet denoising.
    Iyer D; Zouridakis G
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2007 Mar; 118(3):495-504. PubMed ID: 17188929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.