BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

99 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12074950)

  • 1. Contrast sensitivity and the Stiles--Crawford effect.
    Atchison DA; Scott DH
    Vision Res; 2002 Jun; 42(12):1559-69. PubMed ID: 12074950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Influence of Stiles-Crawford apodization on visual acuity.
    Atchison DA; Scott DH; Strang NC; Artal P
    J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis; 2002 Jun; 19(6):1073-83. PubMed ID: 12049344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The influence of the Stiles-Crawford peak location on visual performance.
    Atchison DA; Marcos S; Scott DH
    Vision Res; 2003 Mar; 43(6):659-68. PubMed ID: 12604102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The Stiles-Crawford effect and subjective measurement of aberrations.
    Atchison DA; Scott DH
    Vision Res; 2002 Apr; 42(9):1089-102. PubMed ID: 11997048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Influence of Stiles-Crawford effect on visual performance after laser in situ keratomileusis.
    Fang L; Wang Y; Chen F
    J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis; 2012 Aug; 29(8):1482-8. PubMed ID: 23201862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Apodization by the Stiles-Crawford effect moderates the visual impact of retinal image defocus.
    Zhang X; Ye M; Bradley A; Thibos L
    J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis; 1999 Apr; 16(4):812-20. PubMed ID: 10192960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effects of defocus and pupil size on human contrast sensitivity.
    Strang NC; Atchison DA; Woods RL
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 1999 Sep; 19(5):415-26. PubMed ID: 10768022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Analysing the impact of myopia on the Stiles-Crawford effect of the first kind using a digital micromirror device.
    Carmichael Martins A; Vohnsen B
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2018 May; 38(3):273-280. PubMed ID: 29380408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Measuring contrast sensitivity with inappropriate optical correction.
    Woods RL; Strang NC; Atchison DA
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2000 Nov; 20(6):442-51. PubMed ID: 11127124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Influence of Stiles-Crawford effect apodization on spatial visual performance with decentered pupils.
    Atchison DA; Scott DH; Joblin A; Smith G
    J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis; 2001 Jun; 18(6):1201-11. PubMed ID: 11393612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Defocused contrast sensitivity function in peripheral vision.
    Jaisankar D; Suheimat M; Rosén R; Atchison DA
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2022 Mar; 42(2):384-392. PubMed ID: 34897782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Forever young: visual functions not affected or minimally affected by aging: a review.
    Enoch JM; Werner JS; Haegerstrom-Portnoy G; Lakshminarayanan V; Rynders M
    J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci; 1999 Aug; 54(8):B336-51. PubMed ID: 10496540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Correlation between optical and psychophysical parameters as a function of defocus.
    Villegas EA; González C; Bourdoncle B; Bonnin T; Artal P
    Optom Vis Sci; 2002 Jan; 79(1):60-7. PubMed ID: 11828900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Visual acuity modeling using optical raytracing of schematic eyes.
    Greivenkamp JE; Schwiegerling J; Miller JM; Mellinger MD
    Am J Ophthalmol; 1995 Aug; 120(2):227-40. PubMed ID: 7639307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Predicting the effects of optical defocus on human contrast sensitivity.
    Atchison DA; Woods RL; Bradley A
    J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis; 1998 Sep; 15(9):2536-44. PubMed ID: 9729866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Influence of Stiles-Crawford effect apodization on spatial visual performance.
    Atchison DA; Joblin A; Smith G
    J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis; 1998 Sep; 15(9):2545-51. PubMed ID: 9729867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Selective broad-band spatial frequency loss in contrast sensitivity functions. Comparison with a model based on optical transfer functions.
    Bour LJ; Apkarian P
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1996 Nov; 37(12):2475-84. PubMed ID: 8933764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effect of positive and negative defocus on contrast sensitivity in myopes and non-myopes.
    Radhakrishnan H; Pardhan S; Calver RI; O'Leary DJ
    Vision Res; 2004; 44(16):1869-78. PubMed ID: 15145681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of two fast quantitative methods for evaluating the Stiles-Crawford function.
    Yamade S; Lakshminarayanan V; Enoch JM
    Am J Optom Physiol Opt; 1987 Aug; 64(8):621-6. PubMed ID: 3661673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Influence of optical defocus on peripheral vision.
    Rosén R; Lundström L; Unsbo P
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2011 Jan; 52(1):318-23. PubMed ID: 20811051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.