BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

193 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12075513)

  • 1. Quality control validation in veterinary laboratories.
    Freeman KP; Gruenwaldt J
    Vet Clin Pathol; 1999; 28(4):150-155. PubMed ID: 12075513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Quality control validation for a veterinary laboratory network of six Sysmex XT-2000iV hematology analyzers.
    Daly S; Graham PA; Freeman KP
    Vet Clin Pathol; 2022 Dec; 51(4):565-576. PubMed ID: 35922888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Quality control validation, application of sigma metrics, and performance comparison between two biochemistry analyzers in a commercial veterinary laboratory.
    Farr AJ; Freeman KP
    J Vet Diagn Invest; 2008 Sep; 20(5):536-44. PubMed ID: 18776084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Repeat patient testing-based quality control shows promise for use in veterinary biochemistry testing.
    Flatland B; Freeman KP
    Vet Clin Pathol; 2020 Dec; 49(4):590-606. PubMed ID: 33314202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The importance of quality control validation and relationships with total error quality goals and bias in the interpretation of laboratory results.
    Freeman K; Klenner-Gastreich S; Korchia J
    Vet Clin Pathol; 2024 Feb; 53 Suppl 1():65-74. PubMed ID: 38165023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Use of Six Sigma Worksheets for assessment of internal and external failure costs associated with candidate quality control rules for an ADVIA 120 hematology analyzer.
    Cian F; Villiers E; Archer J; Pitorri F; Freeman K
    Vet Clin Pathol; 2014 Jun; 43(2):164-71. PubMed ID: 24750485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Repeat patient testing-quality control compared to commercial quality control material for the Sysmex XT-2000iV hematology analyzer in a multi-site veterinary laboratory.
    Daly S; Rishniw M; Graham PA; Freeman KP
    Vet Clin Pathol; 2024 Feb; 53 Suppl 1():48-59. PubMed ID: 38356015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of 3 options for choosing control limits in biochemistry testing.
    Manzocchi S; Furman E; Freeman K
    Vet Clin Pathol; 2017 Mar; 46(1):120-125. PubMed ID: 28165632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. QC Validator 2.0: a computer program for automatic selection of statistical QC procedures for applications in healthcare laboratories.
    Westgard JO; Stein B; Westgard SA; Kennedy R
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 1997 Jul; 53(3):175-86. PubMed ID: 9230452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Assuring analytical quality through process planning and quality control.
    Westgard JO
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1992 Jul; 116(7):765-9. PubMed ID: 1497451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Guidance for quality control practices and precision goals for CBCs based on IQMH patterns-of-practice survey.
    Johnston A; Bourner G; Martin T; McFarlane A; Good D; Padmore R; Raby A; Aslan B
    Int J Lab Hematol; 2019 Feb; 41(1):15-22. PubMed ID: 30138534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Repeat patient testing shows promise as a quality control method for veterinary hematology testing.
    Flatland B; Freeman KP
    Vet Clin Pathol; 2018 Jun; 47(2):252-266. PubMed ID: 29505172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. An overview of quality control practices in Ontario with particular reference to cholesterol analysis.
    Krishnan S; Webb S; Henderson AR; Cheung CM; Nazir DJ; Richardson H
    Clin Biochem; 1999 Mar; 32(2):93-9. PubMed ID: 10211624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Technical quality assurance and quality control for medical laboratories: a review and proposal of a new concept to obtain integrated and validated QA/QC plans.
    van Rossum HH
    Crit Rev Clin Lab Sci; 2022 Dec; 59(8):586-600. PubMed ID: 35758201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Selecting multi-rule quality control procedures based on patient risk.
    Bayat H
    Clin Chem Lab Med; 2017 Oct; 55(11):1702-1708. PubMed ID: 28236626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluation of performance of veterinary in-clinic hematology analyzers.
    Rishniw M; Pion PD
    Vet Clin Pathol; 2016 Dec; 45(4):604-614. PubMed ID: 27716986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Selection of medically useful quality-control procedures for individual tests done in a multitest analytical system.
    Koch DD; Oryall JJ; Quam EF; Feldbruegge DH; Dowd DE; Barry PL; Westgard JO
    Clin Chem; 1990 Feb; 36(2):230-3. PubMed ID: 2302766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Quality-control (QC) performance measures and the QC planning process.
    Parvin CA
    Clin Chem; 1997 Apr; 43(4):602-7. PubMed ID: 9105260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Steady state errors and risk of a QC strategy.
    Mackay MA; Badrick TC
    Clin Biochem; 2019 Feb; 64():37-43. PubMed ID: 30552866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Should quality goals be defined for multicenter laboratory testing? Lessons learned from a pilot survey on a national surveillance program for diabetes.
    Wang L; Mo N; Pang R; Deng Q; Liu Y; Hu Y; Hu C; Wang L
    Int J Qual Health Care; 2016 Apr; 28(2):259-63. PubMed ID: 26796487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.