293 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12075695)
1. New approaches to the imaging, diagnosis, and biopsy of breast lesions.
Esserman LJ
Cancer J; 2002; 8 Suppl 1():S1-14. PubMed ID: 12075695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Breast interventions: a primer for interventional radiologists.
Tomkovich KR
Tech Vasc Interv Radiol; 2006 Mar; 9(1):30-5. PubMed ID: 17145483
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of the performance of screening mammography, physical examination, and breast US and evaluation of factors that influence them: an analysis of 27,825 patient evaluations.
Kolb TM; Lichy J; Newhouse JH
Radiology; 2002 Oct; 225(1):165-75. PubMed ID: 12355001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [The "EVA" Trial: Evaluation of the Efficacy of Diagnostic Methods (Mammography, Ultrasound, MRI) in the secondary and tertiary prevention of familial breast cancer. Preliminary results after the first half of the study period].
Kuhl CK; Schrading S; Weigel S; Nüssle-Kügele K; Sittek H; Arand B; Morakkabati N; Leutner C; Tombach B; Nordhoff D; Perlet C; Rieber A; Heindel W; Brambs HJ; Schild H
Rofo; 2005 Jun; 177(6):818-27. PubMed ID: 15902631
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Breast imaging and needle biopsy in women with clinically evident breast cancer: does combined imaging change overall diagnostic sensitivity?
Ciatto S; Houssami N
Breast; 2007 Aug; 16(4):382-6. PubMed ID: 17350262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Breast cancer screening and problem solving using mammography, ultrasound, and magnetic resonance imaging.
Hooley RJ; Andrejeva L; Scoutt LM
Ultrasound Q; 2011 Mar; 27(1):23-47. PubMed ID: 21343800
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Rationale for a diagnostic chain in gestational breast tumor diagnosis.
Bock K; Hadji P; Ramaswamy A; Schmidt S; Duda VF
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2006 Mar; 273(6):337-45. PubMed ID: 16311748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Screening for breast cancer: current recommendations and future directions.
Knutson D; Steiner E
Am Fam Physician; 2007 Jun; 75(11):1660-6. PubMed ID: 17575656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A decade of breast cancer screening in The Netherlands: trends in the preoperative diagnosis of breast cancer.
Duijm LE; Groenewoud JH; Roumen RM; de Koning HJ; Plaisier ML; Fracheboud J
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2007 Nov; 106(1):113-9. PubMed ID: 17219049
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Diagnosis of early breast cancer.
Homer MJ
Am Fam Physician; 1981 Feb; 23(2):161-6. PubMed ID: 7457324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Contrast-enhanced MR imaging of breast lesions and effect on treatment.
Schelfout K; Van Goethem M; Kersschot E; Colpaert C; Schelfhout AM; Leyman P; Verslegers I; Biltjes I; Van Den Haute J; Gillardin JP; Tjalma W; Van Der Auwera JC; Buytaert P; De Schepper A
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2004 Jun; 30(5):501-7. PubMed ID: 15135477
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Minority report - false negative breast assessment in women recalled for suspicious screening mammography: imaging and pathological features, and associated delay in diagnosis.
Ciatto S; Houssami N; Ambrogetti D; Bonardi R; Collini G; Del Turco MR
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2007 Sep; 105(1):37-43. PubMed ID: 17115112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Breast cancer screening in women over age 50. A critical appraisal.
Peeters PH; Verbeek AL; Zielhuis GA; Vooijs GP; Hendriks JH; Mravunac M
Acta Radiol; 1990 May; 31(3):225-31. PubMed ID: 2201326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Occult breast lesion localization plus sentinel node biopsy (SNOLL): experience with 959 patients at the European Institute of Oncology.
Monti S; Galimberti V; Trifiro G; De Cicco C; Peradze N; Brenelli F; Fernandez-Rodriguez J; Rotmensz N; Latronico A; Berrettini A; Mauri M; Machado L; Luini A; Paganelli G
Ann Surg Oncol; 2007 Oct; 14(10):2928-31. PubMed ID: 17674108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Complementary role of adjunctive breast magnetic resonance imaging and scintimammography in patients of all ages undergoing breast cancer surgery.
Howarth D; Slater S; Lau P; Booker J; Clark D; Sillar R
Australas Radiol; 2005 Aug; 49(4):289-97. PubMed ID: 16026435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Interventional radiology in nonpalpable lesions of the breast].
Tardivon A; Meunier M; El Khoury C; Thibault F
J Radiol; 2003 Apr; 84(4 Pt 1):381-6. PubMed ID: 12759651
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Alternative breast biopsies].
Balleyguler C; Bidault F; Caillet H; Dromain C
Rev Prat; 2008 Sep; 58(14):1513-6. PubMed ID: 18839677
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Follow-up recommendations for benign breast biopsies.
Shin S; Schneider HB; Cole FJ; Laronga C
Breast J; 2006; 12(5):413-7. PubMed ID: 16958957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The challenge of imaging dense breast parenchyma: is magnetic resonance mammography the technique of choice? A comparative study with x-ray mammography and whole-breast ultrasound.
Pediconi F; Catalano C; Roselli A; Dominelli V; Cagioli S; Karatasiou A; Pronio A; Kirchin MA; Passariello R
Invest Radiol; 2009 Jul; 44(7):412-21. PubMed ID: 19448554
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluation of palpable breast masses.
Klein S
Am Fam Physician; 2005 May; 71(9):1731-8. PubMed ID: 15887452
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
