These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12075981)

  • 1. Analysis of the perceptual learning effect in flavour aversion learning: evidence for stimulus differentiation.
    Mondragón E; Hall G
    Q J Exp Psychol B; 2002 Apr; 55(2):153-69. PubMed ID: 12075981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison and contrast as a mechanism of perceptual learning?
    Bennett CH; Mackintosh NJ
    Q J Exp Psychol B; 1999 Aug; 52(3):253-72. PubMed ID: 10467899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Perceptual learning in flavor aversion: evidence for learned changes in stimulus effectiveness.
    Blair CA; Hall G
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2003 Jan; 29(1):39-48. PubMed ID: 12561132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Stimulus comparison in perceptual learning: roles of sensory preconditioning and latent inhibition.
    Rodríguez G; Alonso G
    Behav Processes; 2008 Mar; 77(3):400-4. PubMed ID: 17728074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Dissociation between the Espinet and perceptual learning effects in flavour aversion conditioning.
    Prados J; Hall G; Leonard S
    Behav Processes; 2004 Mar; 65(3):221-9. PubMed ID: 14998659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Stimulus preexposure, comparison, and changes in the associability of common stimulus features.
    Symonds M; Hall G
    Q J Exp Psychol B; 1997 Nov; 50(4):317-31. PubMed ID: 9421977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The Espinet and the perceptual learning effects in flavour aversion conditioning: do they depend on a common inhibitory mechanism?
    Artigas AA; Sansa J; Prados J
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2006 Mar; 59(3):471-81. PubMed ID: 16627350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The influence of comparison between similar stimuli on the effectiveness of their unique features.
    Lombas AS; Alonso G; Rodríguez G
    Behav Processes; 2008 May; 78(1):112-6. PubMed ID: 18242877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Blocked and test-stimulus exposure effects in perceptual learning re-examined.
    Sanjuan Mdel C; Alonso G; Nelson JB
    Behav Processes; 2004 Apr; 66(1):23-33. PubMed ID: 15062968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Order effects after blocked preexposure to two compound flavors.
    Espinet A; Caramés JM; Chamizo VD
    Behav Processes; 2011 Oct; 88(2):94-100. PubMed ID: 21871952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Enhanced discrimination between flavor stimuli: roles of salience modulation and inhibition.
    Artigas AA; Sansa J; Blair CA; Hall G; Prados J
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2006 Apr; 32(2):173-7. PubMed ID: 16634660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Salience modulation and associative inhibition interaction: short but not long exposure to similar stimuli protects the salience of the unique elements.
    Contel DM; Sansa J; Artigas AA; Prados J
    Behav Processes; 2011 Jan; 86(1):21-9. PubMed ID: 20804832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Perceptual learning in an appetitive Pavlovian procedure: analysis of the effectiveness of the common element.
    Mondragón E; Murphy RA
    Behav Processes; 2010 Mar; 83(3):247-56. PubMed ID: 20026195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Perceptual learning in humans: roles of preexposure schedule, feedback, and discrimination assay.
    Dwyer DM; Hodder KI; Honey RC
    Q J Exp Psychol B; 2004 Jul; 57(3):245-59. PubMed ID: 15204109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The contribution of latent inhibition to reduced generalization after pre-exposure to the test stimulus.
    Sanjuan Mdel C; Alonso G; Nelson JB
    Behav Processes; 2006 Jan; 71(1):21-8. PubMed ID: 16242859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Preservation of within-compound associations after blocked preexposure to two compound flavors.
    Espinet A; Caramés JM; Cabo F
    Behav Processes; 2015 Nov; 120():94-100. PubMed ID: 26358495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Salience modulation in serial preexposure: implications for perceptual learning.
    Artigas AA; Contel DM; Sansa J; Prados J
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2012 Jan; 38(1):66-73. PubMed ID: 22229588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. An examination of the effectiveness of inflation and deflation treatments in detecting within-compound learning of a taste aversion.
    Pineño O
    Behav Processes; 2007 May; 75(1):33-9. PubMed ID: 17320310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Perceptual learning in flavour aversion conditioning.
    Mackintosh NJ; Kaye H; Bennett CH
    Q J Exp Psychol B; 1991 Aug; 43(3):297-322. PubMed ID: 1658852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Perceptual learning after rapidly alternating exposure to taste compounds: Assessment with different indices of generalization.
    Sánchez J; Dwyer DM; Honey RC; de Brugada I
    J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn; 2022 Jul; 48(3):169-178. PubMed ID: 35878079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.