These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12076052)

  • 21. Comments on noise and resolution of the DenOptix radiography system.
    Couture RA
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2003 Jun; 95(6):746-51. PubMed ID: 12789159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Perceptibility curve test for conventional and colour-coded radiographs.
    Shi XQ; Li G; Yoshiura K; Welander U
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2004 Sep; 33(5):318-22. PubMed ID: 15585809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Visually detectable resolution of intraoral dental films.
    Künzel A; Scherkowski D; Willers R; Becker J
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2003 Nov; 32(6):385-9. PubMed ID: 15070841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Digital radiography: more than meets the eye.
    Benjamin SD
    Compend Contin Educ Dent; 2005 Jun; 26(6A Suppl):464, 466-7. PubMed ID: 16018251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Comparison of the psychophysical properties of various intraoral film and digital systems by means of the perceptibility curve test.
    Yoshiura K; Welander U; McDavid WD; Li G; Shi XQ; Nakayama E; Shimizu M; Okamura K; Kanda S
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2004 Mar; 33(2):98-102. PubMed ID: 15314001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The digital revolution, images and X-rays.
    Emmott LF
    N Y State Dent J; 2005 Jan; 71(1):40-3. PubMed ID: 15768910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Revisiting dynamic range and image enhancement ability of contemporary digital radiographic systems.
    Marinho-Vieira LE; Martins LAC; Freitas DQ; Haiter-Neto F; Oliveira ML
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2022 May; 51(4):20210404. PubMed ID: 34860568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Effect of the number of basis images on the detection of longitudinal tooth fractures using local computed tomography.
    Mora MA; Mol A; Tyndall DA; Rivera EM
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2007 Oct; 36(7):382-6. PubMed ID: 17881595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. An evaluation of the origin of trabecular bone patterns using visual and digital image analysis.
    Jett S; Shrout MK; Mailhot JM; Potter BJ; Borke JL
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2004 Nov; 98(5):598-604. PubMed ID: 15529133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The perceptibility curve test applied to direct digital dental radiography.
    Yoshiura K; Stamatakis H; Shi XQ; Welander U; McDavid WD; Kristoffersen J; Tronje G
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1998 May; 27(3):131-5. PubMed ID: 9693524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. A comparison of two intraoral CCD sensor systems in terms of image quality and interobserver agreement.
    Schulze D; Rother UJ; Fuhrmann AW; Tietke M
    Int J Comput Dent; 2003 Apr; 6(2):141-50. PubMed ID: 14552151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Development and evaluation of digital subtraction radiography computer program.
    Lee SS; Huh YJ; Kim KY; Heo MS; Choi SC; Koak JY; Heo SJ; Han CH; Yi WJ
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2004 Oct; 98(4):471-5. PubMed ID: 15472663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Digital chest radiography with a solid-state flat-panel x-ray detector: contrast-detail evaluation with processed images printed on film hard copy.
    Chotas HG; Ravin CE
    Radiology; 2001 Mar; 218(3):679-82. PubMed ID: 11230639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Is digital better in dental radiography?
    Zdesar U; Fortuna T; Valantic B; Skrk D
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 129(1-3):138-9. PubMed ID: 18375462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Accuracy of cephalometric landmarks on monitor-displayed radiographs with and without image emboss enhancement.
    Leonardi RM; Giordano D; Maiorana F; Greco M
    Eur J Orthod; 2010 Jun; 32(3):242-7. PubMed ID: 20022892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Evaluation of automatic exposure control in a direct digital intraoral system.
    Benchimol D; Näsström K; Shi X
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2009 Sep; 38(6):407-12. PubMed ID: 19700535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Computer-assisted orientation of dental periapical radiographs to the occlusal plane.
    Huang CH; Hsu CY
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2008 May; 105(5):649-53. PubMed ID: 18296083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Contrast perception in digitized panoramic radiographs compared with their film-based origin.
    Schulze RK; Rosing ST; D'Hoedt B
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2002 Sep; 94(3):388-94. PubMed ID: 12324798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The effects of incremental brightness and contrast adjustments on radiographic data: a quantitative study.
    Güneri P; Lomçali G; Boyacioğlu H; Kendir S
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2005 Jan; 34(1):20-7. PubMed ID: 15709101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.