These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
4. Process measures and short-term mortality for acute myocardial infarction. McKalip D; Harbaugh RE JAMA; 2006 Dec; 296(21):2557; author reply 2557-8. PubMed ID: 17148720 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Effectiveness of public report cards for improving the quality of cardiac care: the EFFECT study: a randomized trial. Tu JV; Donovan LR; Lee DS; Wang JT; Austin PC; Alter DA; Ko DT JAMA; 2009 Dec; 302(21):2330-7. PubMed ID: 19923205 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Pay for performance, quality of care, and outcomes in acute myocardial infarction. Glickman SW; Ou FS; DeLong ER; Roe MT; Lytle BL; Mulgund J; Rumsfeld JS; Gibler WB; Ohman EM; Schulman KA; Peterson ED JAMA; 2007 Jun; 297(21):2373-80. PubMed ID: 17551130 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Hospital quality for acute myocardial infarction: correlation among process measures and relationship with short-term mortality. Bradley EH; Herrin J; Elbel B; McNamara RL; Magid DJ; Nallamothu BK; Wang Y; Normand SL; Spertus JA; Krumholz HM JAMA; 2006 Jul; 296(1):72-8. PubMed ID: 16820549 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Relationship between Medicare's hospital compare performance measures and mortality rates. Werner RM; Bradlow ET JAMA; 2006 Dec; 296(22):2694-702. PubMed ID: 17164455 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Alternative pay-for-performance scoring methods: implications for quality improvement and patient outcomes. Glickman SW; Boulding W; Roos JM; Staelin R; Peterson ED; Schulman KA Med Care; 2009 Oct; 47(10):1062-8. PubMed ID: 19648833 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Administrative Data Feedback for Effective Cardiac Treatment: AFFECT, a cluster randomized trial. Beck CA; Richard H; Tu JV; Pilote L JAMA; 2005 Jul; 294(3):309-17. PubMed ID: 16030275 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Volume-outcome relationship in acute myocardial infarction: the balloon and the needle. Jollis JG; Romano PS JAMA; 2000 Dec; 284(24):3169-71. PubMed ID: 11135782 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. The inverse relationship between mortality rates and performance in the Hospital Quality Alliance measures. Jha AK; Orav EJ; Li Z; Epstein AM Health Aff (Millwood); 2007; 26(4):1104-10. PubMed ID: 17630453 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Measuring hospital quality: what physicians do? How patients fare? Or both? Jha AK JAMA; 2006 Jul; 296(1):95-7. PubMed ID: 16820553 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Grading the graders: how hospitals in California and New York perceive and interpret their report cards. Romano PS; Rainwater JA; Antonius D Med Care; 1999 Mar; 37(3):295-305. PubMed ID: 10098573 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Quality of care in U.S. hospitals. Robbins RA; Klotz SA N Engl J Med; 2005 Oct; 353(17):1860-1; author reply 1860-1. PubMed ID: 16251547 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Public profiling of clinical performance. Naylor CD JAMA; 2002 Mar; 287(10):1323-5. PubMed ID: 11886325 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Hospital performance recognition with the Get With The Guidelines Program and mortality for acute myocardial infarction and heart failure. Heidenreich PA; Lewis WR; LaBresh KA; Schwamm LH; Fonarow GC Am Heart J; 2009 Oct; 158(4):546-53. PubMed ID: 19781413 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]