These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12076899)

  • 21. Effects of reduced exposure on computed radiography: comparison of nodule detection accuracy with conventional and asymmetric screen-film radiographs of a chest phantom.
    Kimme-Smith C; Aberle DR; Sayre JW; Hart EM; Greaves SM; Brown K; Young DA; Deseran MD; Johnson T; Johnson SL
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 Aug; 165(2):269-73. PubMed ID: 7618538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Electronic imaging impact on image and report turnaround times.
    Mattern CW; King BF; Hangiandreou NJ; Swenson A; Jorgenson LL; Webbles WE; Okrzynski TW; Erickson BJ; Williamson B; Forbes GS
    J Digit Imaging; 1999 May; 12(2 Suppl 1):155-9. PubMed ID: 10342198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Comparison of an asymmetric screen-film combination with a conventional screen-film combination for chest radiography in 51 patients.
    Greaney T; McCoy C; Masterson J
    Br J Radiol; 1997 Sep; 70(837):929-32. PubMed ID: 9486069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Filmless versus film-based systems in radiographic examination costs: an activity-based costing method.
    Muto H; Tani Y; Suzuki S; Yokooka Y; Abe T; Sase Y; Terashita T; Ogasawara K
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2011 Sep; 11():246. PubMed ID: 21961846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. [Preliminary clinical applications of asymmetric screen-film systems in chest radiography].
    Higashida Y; Katsuda N; Tochihara S; Yoshioka S; Bussaka H; Tomiguchi S; Takada T; Matsumoto M; Takahashi M; Yoshida A
    Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi; 1994 Feb; 54(2):171-9. PubMed ID: 8121782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Digital radiography versus conventional radiography in chest imaging: diagnostic performance of a large-area silicon flat-panel detector in a clinical CT-controlled study.
    Garmer M; Hennigs SP; Jäger HJ; Schrick F; van de Loo T; Jacobs A; Hanusch A; Christmann A; Mathias K
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2000 Jan; 174(1):75-80. PubMed ID: 10628458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Threshold perception performance with computed and screen-film radiography: implications for chest radiography.
    Dobbins JT; Rice JJ; Beam CA; Ravin CE
    Radiology; 1992 Apr; 183(1):179-87. PubMed ID: 1549669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Modality interfacing: the impact of a relay station.
    Carrino JA; Khorasani R; Hanlon WB; Seltzer SE
    J Digit Imaging; 2000 May; 13(2 Suppl 1):88-92. PubMed ID: 10847371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Digital versus screen-film mammography: a retrospective comparison in a population-based screening program.
    Heddson B; Rönnow K; Olsson M; Miller D
    Eur J Radiol; 2007 Dec; 64(3):419-25. PubMed ID: 17383841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Patient absorbed doses in digital grey-scale fluorography.
    Cowen AR; Taylor C
    Br J Radiol; 1986 Jul; 59(703):689-93. PubMed ID: 3730767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Radiologists' productivity in the interpretation of CT scans: a comparison of PACS with conventional film.
    Reiner BI; Siegel EL; Hooper FJ; Pomerantz S; Dahlke A; Rallis D
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2001 Apr; 176(4):861-4. PubMed ID: 11264065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Clinical experience with an advanced laser digitizer for cost-effective digital radiography.
    MacMahon H; Xu XW; Hoffmann KR; Giger ML; Yoshimura H; Doi K; Carlin M; Kano A; Yao L; Abe K
    Radiographics; 1993 May; 13(3):635-45; discussion 645-6. PubMed ID: 8316670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Financial assessment of a picture archiving and communication system implemented all at once.
    Fang YC; Yang MC; Hsueh YS
    J Digit Imaging; 2006; 19 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):44-51. PubMed ID: 16763930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. [Thoracic radiography in intensive care units. Comparison of an asymmetric film-screen-grid combination with an L-film].
    Luska G; von Boetticher H; Amling B; Herzog R
    Rofo; 1995 Aug; 163(2):104-10. PubMed ID: 7670010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Image evolution in conventional radiology: the analog image.
    Pirronti T; Manfredi R; Natale L; Salcuni M
    Rays; 1992; 17(3):342-56. PubMed ID: 1480781
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. [An economic comparison between digital luminescence radiography and conventional film processing in intensive care medicine].
    Peters PE; Dykstra DE; Wiesmann W; Schlüchtermann J; Adam D
    Radiologe; 1992 Nov; 32(11):536-40. PubMed ID: 1461981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Digital imaging of the chest.
    Fraser RG; Sanders C; Barnes GT; MacMahon H; Giger ML; Doi K; Templeton AW; Cox GG; Dwyer SJ; Merritt CR
    Radiology; 1989 May; 171(2):297-307. PubMed ID: 2649913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Maximizing film contrast for scanning equalization radiography.
    Plewes DB; McFaul J; Ivanovic M
    Med Phys; 1990; 17(3):357-61. PubMed ID: 2385192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. [Physics homogenization and the choice of screen-film combination in conventional thoracic radiography].
    Roversi R; Castaldini L; Guidarelli G
    Radiol Med; 1993 Dec; 86(6):885-92. PubMed ID: 8296012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Assessment of digital chest radiography using stimulable phosphor.
    Kehler M; Albrechtsson U; Andersson B; Lárusdóttir H; Lundin A; Pettersson H
    Acta Radiol; 1989; 30(6):581-6. PubMed ID: 2698744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.