188 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12077465)
1. Equating and item banking with the Rasch model.
Wolfe EW
J Appl Meas; 2000; 1(4):409-34. PubMed ID: 12077465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Equating designs and procedures used in Rasch scaling.
Skaggs G; Wolfe EW
J Appl Meas; 2010; 11(2):182-95. PubMed ID: 20693702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Rasch fit statistics as a test of the invariance of item parameter estimates.
Smith RM; Suh KK
J Appl Meas; 2003; 4(2):153-63. PubMed ID: 12748407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Item response theory test equating in health sciences education.
Guilera G; Gómez J
Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2008 Mar; 13(1):3-10. PubMed ID: 16847729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparing concurrent versus fixed parameter equating with common items: using the dichotomous and partial credit models in a mixed-item format test.
Taherbhai HM; Seo DY
J Appl Meas; 2007; 8(1):84-96. PubMed ID: 17215567
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Moving the cut score on Rasch scored tests.
Miller GE; Beretvas SN
J Appl Meas; 2002; 3(3):272-81. PubMed ID: 12147913
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Marginal likelihood inference for a model for item responses and response times.
Glas CA; van der Linden WJ
Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2010 Nov; 63(Pt 3):603-26. PubMed ID: 20109271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The influence of equating methodology on reported trends in PISA.
Gebhardt E; Adams RJ
J Appl Meas; 2007; 8(3):305-22. PubMed ID: 17804896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Pre-equating: a simulation study based on a large scale assessment model.
Taherbhai HM; Young MJ
J Appl Meas; 2004; 5(3):301-18. PubMed ID: 15243175
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluation of the 0.3 logits screening criterion in common item equating.
Miller GE; Rotou O; Twing JS
J Appl Meas; 2004; 5(2):172-7. PubMed ID: 15064536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Some links between classical and modern test theory via the two-level hierarchical generalized linear model.
Miyazaki Y
J Appl Meas; 2005; 6(3):289-310. PubMed ID: 15942072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Fit analysis in latent trait measurement models.
Smith RM
J Appl Meas; 2000; 1(2):199-218. PubMed ID: 12029178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The impact of data collection design, linking method, and sample size on vertical scaling using the Rasch model.
Paek I; Young MJ; Yi Q
J Appl Meas; 2008; 9(3):229-48. PubMed ID: 18753693
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Test equating in the presence of DIF items.
Chu KL; Kamata A
J Appl Meas; 2005; 6(3):342-54. PubMed ID: 15942075
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Rasch simultaneous vertical equating for measuring reading growth.
Lee OK
J Appl Meas; 2003; 4(1):10-23. PubMed ID: 12700428
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Equating of multi-facet tests across administrations.
Lunz M; Suanthong S
J Appl Meas; 2011; 12(2):124-34. PubMed ID: 22089509
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Expected linking error resulting from item parameter drift among the common Items on Rasch calibrated tests.
Miller GE; Gesn PR; Rotou J
J Appl Meas; 2005; 6(1):48-56. PubMed ID: 15701943
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. An investigation of factors affecting test equating in latent trait theory.
Suanthong S; Schumacker RE; Beyerlein MM
J Appl Meas; 2000; 1(1):25-43. PubMed ID: 12023556
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Estimation of maximal reliability for multiple-component instruments in multilevel designs.
Raykov T; Penev S
Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2009 Feb; 62(Pt 1):129-42. PubMed ID: 18001517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Formulating latent growth using an explanatory item response model approach.
Wilson M; Zheng X; McGuire L
J Appl Meas; 2012; 13(1):1-22. PubMed ID: 22677494
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
