385 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12077507)
1. Effect of cleft type on overall speech intelligibility and resonance.
Van Lierde KM; De Bodt M; Van Borsel J; Wuyts FL; Van Cauwenberge P
Folia Phoniatr Logop; 2002; 54(3):158-68. PubMed ID: 12077507
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Outcome of treatment regarding articulation, resonance and voice in Flemish adults with unilateral and bilateral cleft palate.
Van Lierde KM; De Bodt M; Baetens I; Schrauwen V; Van Cauwenberge P
Folia Phoniatr Logop; 2003; 55(2):80-90. PubMed ID: 12697981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The long-term speech outcome in Flemish young adults after two different types of palatoplasty.
Van Lierde KM; Monstrey S; Bonte K; Van Cauwenberge P; Vinck B
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2004 Jul; 68(7):865-75. PubMed ID: 15183576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Influence of pharyngeal flap surgery on nasality and nasalance scores of nasal sounds production in individuals with cleft lip and palate.
Fukushiro AP; Ferlin F; Yamashita RP; Trindade IE
Codas; 2015; 27(6):584-7. PubMed ID: 26691623
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Relationship between perceptual ratings of nasality and nasometry in children/adolescents with cleft palate and/or velopharyngeal dysfunction.
Sweeney T; Sell D
Int J Lang Commun Disord; 2008; 43(3):265-82. PubMed ID: 17852526
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Speech outcome after cranial-based pharyngeal flap in children born with total cleft, cleft palate, or primary velopharyngeal insufficiency.
de Buys Roessingh AS; Cherpillod J; Trichet-Zbinden C; Hohlfeld J
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2006 Dec; 64(12):1736-42. PubMed ID: 17113439
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Examination of the standard deviation of mean nasalance scores in subjects with cleft palate: implications for clinical use.
Vallino-Napoli LD; Montgomery AA
Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 1997 Nov; 34(6):512-9. PubMed ID: 9431469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Nasalance measures in German-speaking cleft patients.
Swennen GR; Grimaldi H; Upheber J; Kramer FJ; Dempf R
J Craniofac Surg; 2004 Jan; 15(1):158-64; discussion 164. PubMed ID: 14704583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Speech characteristics in a Ugandan child with a rare paramedian craniofacial cleft: a case report.
Van Lierde KM; Bettens K; Luyten A; De Ley S; Tungotyo M; Balumukad D; Galiwango G; Bauters W; Vermeersch H; Hodges A
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2013 Mar; 77(3):446-52. PubMed ID: 23277303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Speech outcome regarding overall intelligibility, articulation, resonance and voice in Flemish children a year after pharyngeal flap surgery. A pilot study.
Van Lierde KM; Bonte K; Baudonck N; Van Cauwenberge P; De Leenheer EM
Folia Phoniatr Logop; 2008; 60(5):223-32. PubMed ID: 18698142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluation of speech intelligibility for children with cleft lip and palate by means of automatic speech recognition.
Schuster M; Maier A; Haderlein T; Nkenke E; Wohlleben U; Rosanowski F; Eysholdt U; Nöth E
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2006 Oct; 70(10):1741-7. PubMed ID: 16814875
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Speech outcome after closure of oronasal fistulas with bone grafts.
Bureau S; Penko M; McFadden L
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2001 Dec; 59(12):1408-13; discussion 1413-4. PubMed ID: 11732024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison between perceptual assessments of nasality and nasalance scores.
Brunnegård K; Lohmander A; van Doorn J
Int J Lang Commun Disord; 2012; 47(5):556-66. PubMed ID: 22938066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Nasalance measures in Marathi consonant-vowel-consonant syllables with pressure consonants produced by children with and without cleft lip and palate.
Nandurkar A
Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2002 Jan; 39(1):59-65. PubMed ID: 11772171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The relationship between nasalance and nasality in children with cleft palate.
Watterson T; McFarlane SC; Wright DS
J Commun Disord; 1993 Apr; 26(1):13-28. PubMed ID: 8340487
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Adaptation of nasometry to Hungarian language and experiences with its clinical application.
Hirschberg J; Bók S; Juhász M; Trenovszki Z; Votisky P; Hirschberg A
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2006 May; 70(5):785-98. PubMed ID: 16246433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Nasometric values for normal nasal resonance in the speech of young Flemish adults.
Van Lierde KM; Wuyts FL; De Bodt M; Van Cauwenberge P
Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2001 Mar; 38(2):112-8. PubMed ID: 11294538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of nasalance scores obtained with the Nasometer, the NasalView, and the OroNasal System.
Bressmann T
Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2005 Jul; 42(4):423-33. PubMed ID: 16001925
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Cleft type and speech proficiency.
Haapanen ML
Folia Phoniatr Logop; 1994; 46(2):57-63. PubMed ID: 8173613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Speech assessment in cleft palate patients: a descriptive study.
Rullo R; Di Maggio D; Festa VM; Mazzarella N
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2009 May; 73(5):641-4. PubMed ID: 19181392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
