These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12078425)
21. Bedside fluoroscopic flexion and extension cervical spine radiographs for clearance of the cervical spine in comatose trauma patients. Bolinger B; Shartz M; Marion D J Trauma; 2004 Jan; 56(1):132-6. PubMed ID: 14749580 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Are plain radiographs of the spine necessary during evaluation after blunt trauma? Accuracy of screening torso computed tomography in thoracic/lumbar spine fracture diagnosis. Berry GE; Adams S; Harris MB; Boles CA; McKernan MG; Collinson F; Hoth JJ; Meredith JW; Chang MC; Miller PR J Trauma; 2005 Dec; 59(6):1410-3; discussion 1413. PubMed ID: 16394914 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Magnetic resonance imaging is not needed to clear cervical spines in blunt trauma patients with normal computed tomographic results and no motor deficits. Schuster R; Waxman K; Sanchez B; Becerra S; Chung R; Conner S; Jones T Arch Surg; 2005 Aug; 140(8):762-6. PubMed ID: 16103286 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Are five-view plain films of the cervical spine unreliable? A prospective evaluation in blunt trauma patients with altered mental status. Diaz JJ; Gillman C; Morris JA; May AK; Carrillo YM; Guy J J Trauma; 2003 Oct; 55(4):658-63; discussion 663-4. PubMed ID: 14566119 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Detection of cervical spine trauma: Are 3-dimensional reconstructed images as accurate as multiplanar computer tomography? Shakil A; Muneeb A; Khan MS; Sohail AH; Ismail S; Maan MHA; Hakmi H; Sajan A; Bari V J Med Imaging Radiat Sci; 2021 Sep; 52(3):385-389. PubMed ID: 34001456 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Comparison of CT and MRI findings for cervical spine clearance in obtunded patients without high impact trauma. Tan LA; Kasliwal MK; Traynelis VC Clin Neurol Neurosurg; 2014 May; 120():23-6. PubMed ID: 24731570 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. The value of cervical magnetic resonance imaging in the evaluation of the obtunded or comatose patient with cervical trauma, no other abnormal neurological findings, and a normal cervical computed tomography. Khanna P; Chau C; Dublin A; Kim K; Wisner D J Trauma Acute Care Surg; 2012 Mar; 72(3):699-702. PubMed ID: 22491556 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Cervical spine evaluation in urban trauma centers: lowering institutional costs and complications through helical CT scan. Grogan EL; Morris JA; Dittus RS; Moore DE; Poulose BK; Diaz JJ; Speroff T J Am Coll Surg; 2005 Feb; 200(2):160-5. PubMed ID: 15664088 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. CT of the spine: are plain spine radiographs necessary? Tress BM; Hare WS Clin Radiol; 1990 May; 41(5):317-20. PubMed ID: 2354597 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. [The role of plain radiography in pelvic trauma in the era of advanced computed tomography]. Chmelová J; Mrázková D; Dzupa V; Báca V; Grill R; Pleva L Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2006 Dec; 73(6):394-9. PubMed ID: 17266841 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Routine evaluation of the cervical spine in head-injured patients with dynamic fluoroscopy: a reappraisal. Davis JW; Kaups KL; Cunningham MA; Parks SN; Nowak TP; Bilello JF; Williams JL J Trauma; 2001 Jun; 50(6):1044-7. PubMed ID: 11426118 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Prospective evaluation of multislice computed tomography versus plain radiographic cervical spine clearance in trauma patients. Mathen R; Inaba K; Munera F; Teixeira PG; Rivas L; McKenney M; Lopez P; Ledezma CJ J Trauma; 2007 Jun; 62(6):1427-31. PubMed ID: 17563660 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Computed tomography whole body imaging in multi-trauma: 7 years experience. Sampson MA; Colquhoun KB; Hennessy NL Clin Radiol; 2006 Apr; 61(4):365-9. PubMed ID: 16546467 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Safe cervical spine clearance in adult obtunded blunt trauma patients on the basis of a normal multidetector CT scan--a meta-analysis and cohort study. Raza M; Elkhodair S; Zaheer A; Yousaf S Injury; 2013 Nov; 44(11):1589-95. PubMed ID: 23856632 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Prospective comparison of admission computed tomographic scan and plain films of the upper cervical spine in trauma patients with altered mental status. Schenarts PJ; Diaz J; Kaiser C; Carrillo Y; Eddy V; Morris JA J Trauma; 2001 Oct; 51(4):663-8; discussion 668-9. PubMed ID: 11586156 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Prospective validation of computed tomographic screening of the thoracolumbar spine in trauma. Hauser CJ; Visvikis G; Hinrichs C; Eber CD; Cho K; Lavery RF; Livingston DH J Trauma; 2003 Aug; 55(2):228-34; discussion 234-5. PubMed ID: 12913630 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Injuries missed by limited computed tomographic imaging of patients with cervical spine injuries. Barrett TW; Mower WR; Zucker MI; Hoffman JR Ann Emerg Med; 2006 Feb; 47(2):129-33. PubMed ID: 16431221 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Use of flexion and extension radiographs of the cervical spine to rule out acute instability in patients with negative computed tomography scans. Khan SN; Erickson G; Sena MJ; Gupta MC J Orthop Trauma; 2011 Jan; 25(1):51-6. PubMed ID: 21085024 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]