These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12079639)

  • 1. In vitro agreement between magnetic resonance imaging and intraluminal Doppler ultrasound for high flow velocity measurements.
    Matre K; Ersland L; Larsen TH; Andersen E
    Scand Cardiovasc J; 2002 May; 36(3):180-6. PubMed ID: 12079639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of magnetic resonance imaging and Laser Doppler Anemometry velocity measurements downstream of replacement heart valves: implications for in vivo assessment of prosthetic valve function.
    Fontaine AA; Heinrich RS; Walker PG; Pedersen EM; Scheidegger MB; Boesiger P; Walton SP; Yoganathan AP
    J Heart Valve Dis; 1996 Jan; 5(1):66-73. PubMed ID: 8834728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Accelerated phase-contrast MR imaging: comparison of k-t BLAST with SENSE and Doppler ultrasound for velocity and flow measurements in the aorta.
    Stadlbauer A; van der Riet W; Globits S; Crelier G; Salomonowitz E
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2009 Apr; 29(4):817-24. PubMed ID: 19306404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Accurate measurement of pulsatile flow velocity in a small tube phantom: comparison of phase-contrast cine magnetic resonance imaging and intraluminal Doppler guidewire.
    Machida H; Komori Y; Ueno E; Shen Y; Hirata M; Kojima S; Sato M; Okazaki T; Masukawa A; Morita S; Suzuki K
    Jpn J Radiol; 2010 Oct; 28(8):571-7. PubMed ID: 20972856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. High-resolution assessment of velocity fields and shear stresses distal to prosthetic heart valves using high-field magnetic resonance imaging.
    Ringgaard S; Botnar RM; Djurhuus C; Stodkilde-Jorgensen H; Hasenkam JM; Boesiger P; Pedersen EM
    J Heart Valve Dis; 1999 Jan; 8(1):96-103. PubMed ID: 10096490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Magnetic resonance blood flow mapping in ischemic heart disease.
    Mohiaddin RH
    Rays; 1999; 24(1):109-18. PubMed ID: 10358388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Zero filled partial fourier phase contrast MR imaging: in vitro and in vivo assessment.
    Szarf G; Dori Y; Rettmann D; Tekes A; Nasir K; Amado L; Foo TK; Bluemke DA
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2006 Jan; 23(1):42-9. PubMed ID: 16315213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Flow volume and shunt quantification in pediatric congenital heart disease by real-time magnetic resonance velocity mapping: a validation study.
    Körperich H; Gieseke J; Barth P; Hoogeveen R; Esdorn H; Peterschröder A; Meyer H; Beerbaum P
    Circulation; 2004 Apr; 109(16):1987-93. PubMed ID: 15066942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [ECG-triggered magnetic resonance tomographic measurement of blood flow velocity in the carotid arteries: comparison with duplex sonography].
    Seiderer M; Kröner KK; Müller E; Spengel F
    Digitale Bilddiagn; 1988 Sep; 8(3):110-4. PubMed ID: 3052991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Quantification of blood velocity and flow rates in the uterine vessels using echo planar imaging at 0.5 Tesla.
    Issa B; Moore RJ; Bowtell RW; Baker PN; Johnson IR; Worthington BS; Gowland PA
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2010 Apr; 31(4):921-7. PubMed ID: 20373437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Complex flow patterns in a real-size intracranial aneurysm phantom: phase contrast MRI compared with particle image velocimetry and computational fluid dynamics.
    van Ooij P; Guédon A; Poelma C; Schneiders J; Rutten MC; Marquering HA; Majoie CB; VanBavel E; Nederveen AJ
    NMR Biomed; 2012 Jan; 25(1):14-26. PubMed ID: 21480417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Real-time Fourier velocity encoding: an in vivo evaluation.
    Macgowan CK; Kellenberger CJ; Detsky JS; Roman K; Yoo SJ
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2005 Mar; 21(3):297-304. PubMed ID: 15723365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Measurement of systolic and diastolic arterial wall shear stress in the ascending aorta.
    Efstathopoulos EP; Patatoukas G; Pantos I; Benekos O; Katritsis D; Kelekis NL
    Phys Med; 2008 Dec; 24(4):196-203. PubMed ID: 18343178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. MRI phase contrast velocity and flow errors in turbulent stenotic jets.
    O'Brien KR; Cowan BR; Jain M; Stewart RA; Kerr AJ; Young AA
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2008 Jul; 28(1):210-8. PubMed ID: 18581344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Reproducibility of the aortic input function (AIF) derived from dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) of the kidneys in a volunteer study.
    Mendichovszky IA; Cutajar M; Gordon I
    Eur J Radiol; 2009 Sep; 71(3):576-81. PubMed ID: 19004588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Magnetic resonance velocity imaging: a new method for prosthetic heart valve study.
    Walker PG; Pedersen EM; Oyre S; Flepp L; Ringgaard S; Heinrich RS; Walton SP; Hasenkam JM; Jorgensen HS; Yoganathan AP
    J Heart Valve Dis; 1995 May; 4(3):296-307. PubMed ID: 7655694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Assessment of the effect of vessel curvature on Doppler measurements in steady flow.
    Balbis S; Guiot C; Roatta S; Arina R; Todros T
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2004 May; 30(5):639-45. PubMed ID: 15183230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluation of in-stent stenosis by magnetic resonance phase-velocity mapping in nickel-titanium stents.
    Holton AD; Walsh EG; Brott BC; Venugopalan R; Hershey B; Ito Y; Shih A; Koomullil R; Anayiotos AS
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2005 Aug; 22(2):248-57. PubMed ID: 16028256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Coded ultrasound for blood flow estimation using subband processing.
    Gran F; Udesen J; Nielsen MB; Jensen JA
    IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2008 Oct; 55(10):2211-20. PubMed ID: 18986869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Spatial factors for quantifying constant flow velocity in a small tube phantom: comparison of phase-contrast cine-magnetic resonance imaging and the intraluminal Doppler guidewire method.
    Machida H; Komori Y; Ueno E; Shen Y; Hirata M; Kojima S; Morita S; Sato M; Okazaki T
    Jpn J Radiol; 2009 Nov; 27(9):335-41. PubMed ID: 19943143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.